Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]511401[/split]
Unfortunately, I think by removing Snyder and delaying JL even further would only end up hurting the DCEU more than it would helping it.
Warner Bros and a lot of people have already invested too much money and time into this universe and backing out now would probably end up being more harmful than good.
Could be, but if the point of divergence of the timelines is Batman killing Supes, what about Doomsday? Lex doesn't release him? Why wouldn't he? and if he does, does Batman stop him with kryptonite?IF the events of BvS are already part of an altered and new timeline, as a result of Barry's warning, then I'm curious to see on what happened in the original/prime one.
Did Superman even join the Justice League in the original one? Some have theorized that Batman was successful in impaling Clark with the spear, which led to a temporary death for him (Clark) but a permanent one for Martha because no one was around to save her. It's also possible that Lois may have died as a result of Clark being temporarily dead as well. So when Clark came back from his temporary death and found out that the two women that he cared about were dead because he wasn't there to save them, courtesy of Batman, he completely lost it.
I hope Suicide Squad works.
David Ayer has a knack of making unlikeable characters likeable (Safe sabotage. Those were just crappy, one-dimensional unlikeable characters)
IF the events of BvS are already part of an altered and new timeline, as a result of Barry's warning, then I'm curious to see on what happened in the original/prime one.
Did Superman even join the Justice League in the original one? Some have theorized that Batman was successful in impaling Clark with the spear, which led to a temporary death for him (Clark) but a permanent one for Martha because no one was around to save her. It's also possible that Lois may have died as a result of Clark being temporarily dead as well. So when Clark came back from his temporary death and found out that the two women that he cared about were dead because he wasn't there to save them, courtesy of Batman, he completely lost it.
Could be, but if the point of divergence of the timelines is Batman killing Supes, what about Doomsday? Lex doesn't release him? Why wouldn't he? and if he does, does Batman stop him with kryptonite?
Unrelated question: is it weird that Gotham and Metropolis are right next to each other? I was of the idea that they were at flight travel distance.
Said this before in another thread but:
Delay Justice League to late 2018 and optionally move the Flash film 4 months up to JL's spot on November 2017 if it's possible due to production, it can survive Star Wars 8 with a few weeks of no competition to make its money, get the solo films out first, after that the DCEU's roster should hopefully look like this:
2016: Batman v Superman & Suicide Squad
2017: Wonder Woman & The Flash
2018: Aquaman & Justice League (no 2 part films)
So by the time Justice League comes out, the world's already seen the entire league fleshed out by now, Superman in Man of Steel, Batman in BvS, Wonder Woman, Flash and Aquaman in their respective films, and Cyborg later on.
Let each solo film get both critical and commercial success for each JLA character so by the time Justice League releases the reputation of the DCEU is fixed.
I mean picture this, Wonder Woman filmFlash filmAquaman filmetc. after all these successful films both critically and at the box office everyone will love these characters, and that's how you build hype for the Justice League film and wipe away the memories of Snyder.
This is what inference is all about. You don't have to see Superman use his vision to see who is Batman. You don't have to show how Lex figured out their identities (he is clearly a genius and billionaire (foil for superspy billionaire Bruce Wayne)). You can see it in your mind. It's actually good to make the audience have to think about how these things played out.
Could be, but if the point of divergence of the timelines is Batman killing Supes, what about Doomsday? Lex doesn't release him? Why wouldn't he? and if he does, does Batman stop him with kryptonite?
Unrelated question: is it weird that Gotham and Metropolis are right next to each other? I was of the idea that they were at flight travel distance.
Here's how I see the knightmare/flash thing:
1. The two things are related. The apocolyptic future is an Injustice nod; Lois' death (it's clearly Lois that has died--not Martha) has made Supes totally evil, with his own army of fascist brutes; Bats has his own faction of rebels. After waking up from that vision/dream (or temporal displacement from Flash?) Bruce is faced with the portal, containing Flash and his warning. The warning is about finding the other metas to stop Supes when/if he goes rogue, and prevent this future.
If this is correct, then my questions are these: what is Darkseid's role in this? It seems like Supes is just evil due to his loss, not under DS' control. Are they working together? Or has Supes' evilness let DS win, but he and Supes are still enemies (of each other and of Bats and co.)?
2. The two things are not related. The knightmare is simply a dream/vision of a future where the 1% chance of rogue Supes has happened. It is fueled by Bruce's fear and paranoia. He wakes up from the dream/vision, and sees Flash, come from a DIFFERENT future to deliver a warning about some other threat which the JL needs to form to combat.
If this is correct, my questions are these:
1. Who is the "he" Bruce was right about? Is it Supes? Is it Darkseid? Lex?
2. What is Lois the key to? It would seem weird, if Lois' death causes Supes' heel turn, to refer to Lois as "the key." it would make more sense to say "save Lois." or "protect Lois"
So what is she the key to? Finding the metas? Getting Bruce to save Martha (THAT future with Martha dead could be the future flash is from, not the Knightmare one)?
I feel like there has to be some kind of mythology symbolism Snyder is pushing with that one somehow......hell If I know what it is though and it sure as hell didn't justify it.
From a Christ Figure standpoint, I think the spear might have been his cross.
I'm pretty sure he fell three times, too.
Unrelated question: is it weird that Gotham and Metropolis are right next to each other? I was of the idea that they were at flight travel distance.
From a Christ Figure standpoint, I think the spear might have been his cross.
I'm pretty sure he fell three times, too. He had trouble carrying it...and had to go back and get it, falling a couple of times in the process.
The one time she got it was when he was having someone help him carry it, which is significant.
No no, I get all that. The fact that its a spear is almost certainly a reference to the whole spear of destiny thing also (oh so clever snyder). I'm just talking specifically about Lois tossing it in the water...I feel like there's probably some symbolic reasoning behind it.
Or it could just be lazy writing. There's a fine line between "inference" where you don't have to see things so much as they were inferred (which would've probably been fine for comic fans who knows Superman in and out), and lazy writing where liberties are taken and assumes the audience will just figure it out by themselves or left confused.
The scene I was describing would've taken an additional 3 seconds, would've looked cool and a treat to see the reaction of Bruce Wayne that Superman kind of cheated and looked behind the cowl (if I recall correctly Superman didn't use his xray vision at all in the movie), and would've left no confusion or questions for the audience as to how he came about to know Bruce is Batman.
I just see it as a missed opportunity
I wish I had your uncanny mutant ability to decipher bad script writing and turn it into reason man. You must enjoy a love of movies.I keep forgetting...someone asked earlier why he would say "Martha" and not "Mom" when he's trying to appeal to Batman.
He thinks Batman is going to kill him. He's begging Batman that if he kills him, to at least find someone named Martha and save her from Luthor.
In theory, Batman wouldn't get very far trying to find someone named Mom.
Granted, Clark seems almost delirious at that point.
Now we're using our melons. I was thinking maybe the Joker kills Lois in the future and Superman blames Batman for letting him live.
I keep forgetting...someone asked earlier why he would say "Martha" and not "Mom" when he's trying to appeal to Batman.
He thinks Batman is going to kill him. He's begging Batman that if he kills him, to at least find someone named Martha and save her from Luthor.
In theory, Batman wouldn't get very far trying to find someone named Mom.
Granted, Clark seems almost delirious at that point.