Botch? What happened?
It's interesting booking. Steph claims Rollins won so she can draft the champ. They either let him keep it or he loses it to Dean or Roman at BG and Rollins creates a new one anyway. I actually like how this ended and want to tune in tomorrow to see how they follow this up....that's bull.
Good job screwing that up WWE.
We're reminded how fake this fake wrestling is by a stupid finish that just so happened to occur prior to a brand split. How convenient!
Like the brand split wasn't enough reason to have two heavyweight titles anyway.
I'm fine with splitting the titles. Honestly I was never onboard with unifying them to begin with and it's not like unification has made the product any better (if anything it's gotten worse). And Smackdown feels more irrelevant than it's ever been (to the point that I barely tune in anymore).
Plus logistically it's just easier to work with a title on each show, and you minimize the potentially of burning your champion out/getting him injured (since he doesn't have to essentially do double the workload).
My idea is to treat the brands as mostly separate and:
-Raw gets the WWE Championship, the IC Championship, and the Women's Championship (although if that moved over to SD, I wouldn't really complain).
-Smackdown gets the WHC, the US Title, and the reactivated Cruiserweight title (since I really want that back and it'd instantly set SD apart from Raw if it's a cornerstone of the brand). Although I could like with them doing away with the US title (since the IC title can serve both functions really) if they'd bring back the Cruiserweights.
-The Tag Team Titles would float between both brands.
EDIT: I see that they're bringing back the CW's on Raw. It's cool that they're back, but they'd be better off on SD imo. If they're doing this, then I'd prefer to see the Women's title moved over to SD instead.
You remind me how much I actually miss Mark Maddens articles on Wrestlezone
I was never too bothered with it either way. I was fine with two titles and didn't think unifying them would automatically make them better. When we got one world title I was fine with that too and didn't get particularly excited about it being split again.
It's always about booking and how the titles are treated and how the champions are treated when it comes to the titles value and importance. Give the champs the opportunities to make those belts look amazing. Have grand competition for them. Dont make the world champions secondary.
I just hope the other belt is at least inspired by the big good belt and carries rust lineage. If we get another title it should be one that has some history instead of starting from scratch.
Mmmmm...Becky. I was t that high on her at first but now? One of my favorite women in WWE.
That ending was pretty much to set up 2 Titles on Raw and SD.
I am sick of watching Ambrose reverse every move by that rebounding of the ropes stuff,he did it 4 times against Rollins in the title clash,it's not even cool to me anymore.