NotSoLongAgo
#spidermansolit
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 7,154
- Reaction score
- 13
- Points
- 58
False equivalence fallacies abound
oh, and for the next X-Men reboot, I propose the following:
Cyclops is a fat, bald Puerto Rican who grew up in the slums. Jean is a rich Chinese girl with a phoenix tattooed on her back. And Storm is a Native American who comes from a long line of "Weather Shamans" in her tribe. Oh, and Storm is in a lesbian relationship with Jean.
I mean. look at that diversity!! Not just in terms of race and nationality, but also body sizes, sexual orientation, and socio-economic backgrounds.
Other than that, they all have the same powers as their traditional counterparts.

oh, and for the next X-Men reboot, I propose the following:
Cyclops is a fat, bald Puerto Rican who grew up in the slums. Jean is a rich Chinese girl with a phoenix tattooed on her back. And Storm is a Native American who comes from a long line of "Weather Shamans" in her tribe. Oh, and Storm is in a lesbian relationship with Jean.
I mean. look at that diversity!! Not just in terms of race and nationality, but also body sizes, sexual orientation, and socio-economic backgrounds.
Other than that, they all have the same powers as their traditional counterparts.
oh, and for the next X-Men reboot, I propose the following:
Cyclops is a fat, bald Puerto Rican who grew up in the slums. Jean is a rich Chinese girl with a phoenix tattooed on her back. And Storm is a Native American who comes from a long line of "Weather Shamans" in her tribe. Oh, and Storm is in a lesbian relationship with Jean.
I mean. look at that diversity!! Not just in terms of race and nationality, but also body sizes, sexual orientation, and socio-economic backgrounds.
Other than that, they all have the same powers as their traditional counterparts.
Eh, there are worse things. Like being a Captain Marvel fan and hearing that her movie almost didn't get greenlit because Perlmutter was against it... because Catwoman sucked or something.i dont wish anybody what we Spider-Man fans are going through right now.

As long as it was part of the MCU, every single one of those decisions and changes would be defended and celebrated by almost everyone, because it would be considered more progressive and updated.
At the end of this movie you will have an MJ who likely looks like the MJ from the comics, and acts like the MJ from the comics. Who cares if she has to go through an arc to get there?

I hate how we have to go through an arc to see Superman become Superman.Just about everybody on this forum.
I guess I can see their point, too, because they don't wanna see MJ go through an arc to be MJ just like I don't wanna see Peter go through an arc to be Peter, but eh.
The Zendaya/MJ stuff doesn't concern me, really. Only thing I'd find silly is if she's Michelle Jane or Michelle Johnson instead of Mary Jane.
MJ is iconic. She is THE lead female in the Spider-man franchise. You didnt see much of a stink when Liz was changed to black but she's less iconic and rather minor in comparison. MJ though? Shes a pretty big deal. Besides they've already changed Liz's race. Why did they have to go and do it to the other female love interest?People are getting too excited. I'm against changing the look of characters whom are too iconic. For example I don't want a Chinese nor Hispanic batman.
But I can accept a black mary Jane. When most characters were created our society was dominated by whites. As a result most fictional characters were white. They have to look for opportunities to correct that without changing the look of characters who are considered extremely iconic.
That absolutely wouldn't be the case, because those are ridiculously exaggerated and major changes, beyond just race. What a ridiculous assertion. At the end of this movie you will have an MJ who likely looks like the MJ from the comics, and acts like the MJ from the comics. Who cares if she has to go through an arc to get there?
Just about everybody on this forum.
I guess I can see their point, too, because they don't wanna see MJ go through an arc to be MJ just like I don't wanna see Peter go through an arc to be Peter, but eh.
The Zendaya/MJ stuff doesn't concern me, really. Only thing I'd find silly is if she's Michelle Jane or Michelle Johnson instead of Mary Jane.
Actually that's not much different or ridiculous than the multitude of changes made in Spider-Man Homecoming. His point, though slightly exaggerated, still applies. Because of the acceptance and defense of these changes already present in Homecoming, if Marvel was able to secure the rights back for X-men and that was the list of changes, based on the reception from most to Spider-Man Homecoming's deviations from source material, it would be met with a chorus of "they're Marvel they know what they are doing and I trust them". I want a definitive take on Spider-Man that has the same characters as the comic book mythos. Why is that suddenly wrong or out of date? Changing aspects of certain characters in order to service the story or to work for your adaptation is one thing, but wholesale changes on the level of Spider-Man Homecoming is unnecessary and disappointing.
I hate how we have to go through an arc to see Superman become Superman.
Sorry to go off topic
that's it. some characters have a story arc where they undergo a transformation into the character we know.
For example, Bruce Wayne training his mind, body, and spirit to become Batman. James Howlett going through that traumatic childhood where he transforms from sickly, frail James into badass, rugged Logan/Wolverine.
Those transformation arcs are established parts of the character's history.
Other characters are already just "there." Peter is already a science nerd. We don't really need to know or see how he transforms into that science nerd. Just like we don't really need to know or see how MJ transforms from buttoned up, plain, awkward wallflower into fun loving, beautiful party girl. especially when said transformation has never really been part of her backstory.
Not every character needs to have a transformation arc, especially one where they go from complete opposite to where they are supposed to be.
I don't know..I hate how we have to go through an arc to see Superman become Superman.
Sorry to go off topic
I agree that not every character has to go through an arc, but since they're going out of their way to make Peter his own man over time, might as well do something with all of the characters, I guess.
I'm not a fan as I said and I really don't like the idea of having to wait to see Peter be Stark-free, but that seems to be where they're headed.
As I said, if they made MJ be who she is within her debut (as in when we first see her) but made Peter go through his stuff, then I'd feel just as bad about it because while the MJ fans are satisfied, some Peter fans would not be.
Majority on here are fine with watching Peter become his own person over time but I'm just not, really and I dislike the idea of having to wait to see what was already done quite well in both series..which is maybe why they're doing it because the past series did it?I don't know..
At this point, if you're a purist and it really upsets you that much they change the races of comicbook characters, minor or large, in DC or Marvel films and tv shows, then don't watch it. You don't have to see it if you think its such a great betrayal to the comics or source material
There are plenty of other versions in media from cartoons, earlier films, and comics, in which these characters are represented as they were originally created.
What's next? A black J. Jonah Jameson?
YES PLEASE!
![]()
I have no problem with changing Mary Jane's race. But what worries me is the rumors that she's a glasses-wearing geek girl or something similar, and we're not getting a proper adaptation of what made MJ so interesting. Honestly, I can't think of any adapation that really did her justice outside of maybe Spectacular Spider-Man. Not even the first movie.
MJ, to me, was interesting because of how she foiled Peter. After the abuse she suffers as a child, she wears a metaphorical mask, becoming a cheery, ditsy party girl to hide her trauma. In contrast to Peter, who wears a literal mask to confront his responsibilities, MJ wore hers to escape from it. And a couple of adaptations have touched upon her upbringing, but none of them went into the parallels between her and Peter, how she coped through her sadness by putting on a happy face and putting herself in the spotlight. What makes her romance with Peter so great is that it isn't just him sharing his secret with her, she does the same, and unmasks herself to him.
And the other problem is the one Marvel has seemed to have with MJ for years, and that is because she's a pretty supermodel and a party girl, she's not good enough for Peter. Several writers have even actually stated that Peter marrying a supermodel makes his life "easier" as if she wasn't an actual character, and just a prop to make Peter's life easier, and that's much more problematic than this whole reverse racism argument. The idea that Peter needs a geek girl, someone interested in science, or the like all seem to be based on the idea that because MJ is conventionally attractive, she's a stuck-up *****, she's too shallow, she's not right for Peter and only loves him because he's Spider-Man.
And really, that's part of the whole reason why MJ became such a breakout character. She wasn't designed to be Peter's love interest. She wasn't a reporter assigned to Spider-Man or his nurse or science partner. She was a girl with her own life and her own interests, and her romance with Peter wasn't destiny or being perfect for each other, it was an awkward accident of two people learning to open up to each other. That's the biggest reason why MJ became so popular. She wasn't a love interest. She was her own character, who fell in love.
And there's no reason the above can't apply to a black MJ, or an Asian MJ, or a hispanic MJ. But Marvel seems to have had a stick up their ass for years about her, and that Peter can't be with a pretty popular girl because that's too easy for him. And that's what worries me about Homecoming, and I'd be worried even if she was a white girl, because MJ isn't a geek girl, that's completely changing her character.
But that's just a rumor. If they're not real, and she can finally do MJ's backstory justice on the big screen, then I'll happily accept Zendaya as Mary Jane. If the rumors are true, then it's just one more time Marvel shoved MJ into a corner.
MJ is iconic. She is THE lead female in the Spider-man franchise. You didnt see much of a stink when Liz was changed to black but she's less iconic and rather minor in comparison. MJ though? Shes a pretty big deal. Besides they've already changed Liz's race. Why did they have to go and do it to the other female love interest?
And there is nothing to correct. To correct something implies that something was wrong and there was nothing wrong with MJ being a white woman. By and large, most people fall for and settle down with someone like them. Its normal and not out of the ordinary whether its a Peter and MJ in the 60s or in 2016