Homecoming The Zendaya is possibly someone, maybe thread - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
https://***********/AtlantaFilming/status/772409543854882816
 
Still not buying it. :funny:

If she is, there's still a chance she's Michelle J____ or whatever.
 
I'm more interested if that AtlantaFilm guy actually HEARD other characters call Z's character Michelle during the filming.
 
I doubt he was close enough to actually hear dialogues. He probably had that casting sheet we saw or even talked to some non important crew members.

I think that if Zendaya was not playing MJ Sony/Marvel would have said something after the news broke.
 
to be fair, Lois has been portrayed with various hair colors throughout the years and throughout the various media.

sometimes she has black hair ( which is what I'm most used to ). other times she's a brunette. and there have been some instances where she is a ginger.

MJ, however, has consistently been portrayed with one hair color throughout all these years across different versions of the character and across different media. And that hair color is red.
I never understood this argument. It's saying a change is only valid if the change was seen previously. It's allowing for deviation only if the deviation exists someplace else to reference. Well, in order for a change to have been seen previously, it needs to have happened, period. So, at some point, Lois wasn't a redhead. I've never seen Lois as a redhead anywhere but the films, but I'll take your word for it. She became a redhead, somehow/some way -- in a comic, or on a show -- and now when we see her as a redhead in a movie, it's okay...because it happened before.

Well, this is a deviation being birthed into existence...this is the thing which will make people 10 years from now say, "Well, Mary Jane isn't always portrayed as a redhead in media." Before Nick Fury was Black, he was white for 40 years. Then Millar made him Black in Ultimates (His "MJ-ification" moment), the movies made him Black, and people don't care anymore...hopefully.
 
In 10 years time, we'll get people saying "Well, MJ doesn't always stand for Mary Jane." :o
 
I never understood this argument. It's saying a change is only valid if the change was seen previously. It's allowing for deviation only if the deviation exists someplace else to reference. Well, in order for a change to have been seen previously, it needs to have happened, period. So, at some point, Lois wasn't a redhead. I've never seen Lois as a redhead anywhere but the films, but I'll take your word for it. She became a redhead, somehow/some way -- in a comic, or on a show -- and now when we see her as a redhead in a movie, it's okay...because it happened before.

Well, this is a deviation being birthed into existence...this is the thing which will make people 10 years from now say, "Well, Mary Jane isn't always portrayed as a redhead in media." Before Nick Fury was Black, he was white for 40 years. Then Millar made him Black in Ultimates (His "MJ-ification" moment), the movies made him Black, and people don't care anymore...hopefully.

that just goes to show the fine line you have to walk when making changes.

technically, there will always have to be a "1st time" when a change is made.

and once a change has been made, then that does pave the way for more changes to be made in the future.

and I think with movies, you have to be extra careful since they have the potential to have much more widespread and lasting impact on the mainstream's perception of the material.
 
CraY4XXXgAAaWz-.jpg


That was stating the obvious so I just wanted to make sure I was following as to why anyone would need to know that. The fact of the matter is MJ looks visually different than any other live action adaption or any other multimedia if Zendaya really is playing her.

Regardless of your opinions on race bending it it what it is but the vast majority know it to have changed from what they are used to. It is to be expected that some will not like this as humans generally dislike change.

Yeah I know what he/she is talking about I'm just trying to understand why it needed to be explained.

OP made a very obvious comment with a rhetorical question, I answered it anyway, there doesn't have to be a deeper reason for me spelling it out other than to reiterate what's already known...

https://***********/AtlantaFilming/status/772409543854882816

- Hmm, I mean even Zendaya's mom liked a tweet about her being MJ.

- An article about a black Mary Jane was posted on Zendaya.com an official website.

- NBC News broadcasted this news which meant it reached some of the general audience.

- Marvel.com nor Marvel still has yet to release a press release on who the actors are playing despite Jon supposedly revealing it at sdcc.

- Jon Watts nor James Gunn have disputed any of the rumors and they're pretty vocal at negating false things.

I'm more interested if that AtlantaFilm guy actually HEARD other characters call Z's character Michelle during the filming.

When you're taking pictures in secret, you want to be far away enough where you can't be seen, if anything you're relying on the different lenses for your camera to get those close up pics, if he's doing his job right of not being seen, he shouldn't hear anything.

So idk why he said he's on set, knowing damn well he's not being invited to take pics of Spidey, TWD, TVD, or any of the other shows and films being filmed in Atlanta.
 
Last edited:
What if MJ's name turns out to be Michelle Jessica Drew? :o

And there would be an example of killing two birds with one stone.
 
What if MJ's name turns out to be Michelle Jessica Drew? :o

And there would be an example of killing two birds with one stone.

Funnily enough, I was actually thinking that Asian actress Jona Xiao who was recently cast could be Jessica Drew ...or maybe that's not funny at all to some of you guys.
 
Heh all this over a story who's only source is the same guy that said Asa Butterfield got the Peter Parker role.
 
Yeah, it does seem like they're only peddling these stories to make **** happen the same as the "Idris Elba for Bond" camp.

Personally, I don't want to see Idris as Bond. A villain is fine or get his own secret agent character franchise but this goes back to what's been discussed on here ad nauseum. Ian Fleming wrote Bond to be a Caucasian womanizing, alcohol-drinking, dashing and debonair man based off of him. Yes, many different actors have come in and done their spin and some have only come close to Fleming's sketch or summary of what the character is in looks and personality, but if Idris came in then you would have to say that Bond is no longer a person or what Fleming intended him to be but a number or codename. Bond would then become like Jason Bourne: a name anyone could be assigned.

Hence why "Michelle/Mary Jane Watson" is feeling like that. I, as a fan, wanted a traditional Mary Jane Watson right down to casting a real life redheaded actress or someone who has been redhead for quite some time to portray the character. No skulduggery behind it; no playing games with public and audience of "Is she or not MJ?" B.S. but genuinely going forth to the public and announcing, "Yes, this is your new Mary Jane Watson."

All these "Is she Michelle or Mary Jane Watson" stories do is just create further confusion, hostility, frustration, and click-baiting for these sites. Not to mention I am fine with speculating but I've been saying for quite some time, it's time they release a press release or a complete cast announcement especially when "Dr. Strange", "Thor: Ragnarok" and "Black Panther" all have done that. This is the only Marvel film where we don't have full confirmation of who is playing who or even if they'll end up playing that same person. There's also been a lot of talk online that some of the cast read for multiple parts so they may end up actually being someone else entirely then who they read originally for. Also, to add much fiery debate is, again, Zendaya was named by the director (Jon Watts) as Michelle. Stan Lee and James Gunn both only picked up on these tabloid articles and rumor mill website news, but they failed to mention that Watts named Zendaya "Michelle" in interviews. As I've said in the past, until Watts or Marvel themselves will refer to her as Mary Jane Watson and I see her hair completely red, she will not be Mary Jane Watson to me. I haven't seen either or happen.

All I've seen is this:

35932E8500000578-3655784-image-a-98_1466664117519.jpg


tom-holland-zendaya-spider-man-atlanta-first-set-pics-08.jpg


Zendaya:-On-the-set-of-Spider-Man-Homecoming--01.jpg


So, if she is going to be or is Mary Jane Watson and they're throwing out her personality and the classic red hair then this a completely revamped and different version of the character entirely.

And as others discussed, if she decides to go red later or towards the end of the film as a complete makeover then that's not really MJ to me either. Or this creating a persona or "new life." If she was playing a "Michelle" for a film role, I could see that for MJ or a character in a play and she was method acting, but nowhere do I like the idea of a "Hannah Montana"-multiple identities shtick scenario for MJ.

So, maybe this is going to be like Ned and Flash (if Zendaya does become or is MJ) something I am going to have to just bite my tongue and get used to or try to accept, but right now... I'm going to keep calling her Michelle. Until we get an exact quote from Watts, Sony, Marvel Studios, or Zendaya herself or a script leaks, she's going to remain Michelle to me and I think this thread should be titled going forward:

"The Zendaya is Michelle Possibly Mary Jane Thread."

It would only be fair. When you read "is Mary Jane Thread", I am glad the "is" is not capitalized like IS as if it is confirmed, but I think it's quite premature to call her or make a thread stating she is Mary Jane or people keep referring to her as indeed being Mary Jane when we still have no confirmation saying otherwise by the big people in charge.
 
Zendaya is playing Mary Jane Watson. Not Michelle Gonzales, not Michelle Jane, not Michelle "MJ" Johnson... she's 100% playing Mary Jane Watson, mark my words. Or don't, because what if I'm wrong. :o

Funnily enough, I was actually thinking that Asian actress Jona Xiao who was recently cast could be Jessica Drew ...or maybe that's not funny at all to some of you guys.
It's funny, just yesterday I was reading a comic in which Spider-Woman was drawn to look somewhat... um, non-white, and I started wondering if casting a woman of color to play Jessica would unleash another ****storm or if most people just wouldn't care.

Personally I'd be fine with it, but I feel MS would probably want to hire someone a little more well-known than this Xiao lady. She did say on her twitter that she's excited to be part of her "first Marvel project" though, so who knows.
 
Last edited:
Zendaya is playing Mary Jane Watson. Not Michelle Gonzales, not Michelle Jane, not Michelle "MJ" Johnson... she's 100% playing Mary Jane Watson, mark my words. Or don't, because what if I'm wrong. :o

It's funny, just yesterday I was reading a comic in which Spider-Woman was drawn to look somewhat... um, non-white, and I started wondering if casting a woman of color to play Jessica would unleash another ****storm or if most people just wouldn't care.

Personally I'd be fine with it, but I feel MS would probably want to hire someone a little more well-known than this Xiao lady. She did say on her twitter that she's excited to be part of her "first Marvel project" though, so who knows.

In the original comics though, Jessica Drew is British and has light brown hair. She's from the early part of the 20th century but has been placed in suspended animation for decades, so she's a bit like Captain America, but also like these British women from these period dramas.

But at the end of her first issue, she has... wait for it... a makeover to give her black hair and become the Jessica Drew we all know! The black hair is a disguise because someone unmasked her in her first issue and she's trying to hide her identity further. Also, it's shorter black hair, and the hair she has as Spider-Woman is a long black wig, until she eventually grows her own hair out to that length.

So the black hair is not because she is Asian or anything, but part of a makeover... much like Michelle getting red hair to become "MJ".
 
I haven't read her older comics, but IIRC the hair-dyeing was a thing in the Spider-Woman: Origin mini-run too. Let's be real though, such a small and random detail of her backstory is not gonna stop Marvel Studios from casting whoever they want for the role. :hehe:
 
Last edited:
I haven't read her older comics, but IIRC the hair-dying was a thing in the Spider-Woman: Origin mini-run too. Let's be real though, such a small and random detail of her backstory is not gonna stop Marvel Studios from casting whoever they want for the role. :hehe:

But the relevance for this thread is whether MJ's hair dyeing is going to be a small and random detail of her backstory too. And I don't think it would be, since she's always been known as a redhead. Fans don't need to feel that she's earned that red hair or that we need to see some kind of progression towards it, otherwise it won't feel natural.

It's something she could easily have had from the beginning, and is in fact something she's always had. It's not part of a makeover and transformation process from awkward ugly duckling to gregarious hottie and party girl.
 
I'm glad I took a bit of a break from the MJ/Michelle fiasco. Let's see what's new.

"- She is Mary Jane. Here's why...

- No, she is Michelle, here's why..."


Okay, back to the Justice League boards.
 
Fans don't need to feel that she's earned that red hair or that we need to see some kind of progression towards it, otherwise it won't feel natural.
Yeah, I don't get why they think we'd need this either. It was already silly when Singer did it with Rogue 16 years ago, and this year we saw it happen again with Luthor's baldness... I dunno, I guess they think it's clever or something.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, it does seem like they're only peddling these stories to make **** happen the same as the "Idris Elba for Bond" camp.

Personally, I don't want to see Idris as Bond. A villain is fine or get his own secret agent character franchise but this goes back to what's been discussed on here ad nauseum. Ian Fleming wrote Bond to be a Caucasian womanizing, alcohol-drinking, dashing and debonair man based off of him. Yes, many different actors have come in and done their spin and some have only come close to Fleming's sketch or summary of what the character is in looks and personality, but if Idris came in then you would have to say that Bond is no longer a person or what Fleming intended him to be but a number or codename. Bond would then become like Jason Bourne: a name anyone could be assigned.

Hence why "Michelle/Mary Jane Watson" is feeling like that. I, as a fan, wanted a traditional Mary Jane Watson right down to casting a real life redheaded actress or someone who has been redhead for quite some time to portray the character. No skulduggery behind it; no playing games with public and audience of "Is she or not MJ?" B.S. but genuinely going forth to the public and announcing, "Yes, this is your new Mary Jane Watson."

All these "Is she Michelle or Mary Jane Watson" stories do is just create further confusion, hostility, frustration, and click-baiting for these sites. Not to mention I am fine with speculating but I've been saying for quite some time, it's time they release a press release or a complete cast announcement especially when "Dr. Strange", "Thor: Ragnarok" and "Black Panther" all have done that. This is the only Marvel film where we don't have full confirmation of who is playing who or even if they'll end up playing that same person. There's also been a lot of talk online that some of the cast read for multiple parts so they may end up actually being someone else entirely then who they read originally for. Also, to add much fiery debate is, again, Zendaya was named by the director (Jon Watts) as Michelle. Stan Lee and James Gunn both only picked up on these tabloid articles and rumor mill website news, but they failed to mention that Watts named Zendaya "Michelle" in interviews. As I've said in the past, until Watts or Marvel themselves will refer to her as Mary Jane Watson and I see her hair completely red, she will not be Mary Jane Watson to me. I haven't seen either or happen.

All I've seen is this:

35932E8500000578-3655784-image-a-98_1466664117519.jpg


tom-holland-zendaya-spider-man-atlanta-first-set-pics-08.jpg


Zendaya:-On-the-set-of-Spider-Man-Homecoming--01.jpg


So, if she is going to be or is Mary Jane Watson and they're throwing out her personality and the classic red hair then this a completely revamped and different version of the character entirely.

And as others discussed, if she decides to go red later or towards the end of the film as a complete makeover then that's not really MJ to me either. Or this creating a persona or "new life." If she was playing a "Michelle" for a film role, I could see that for MJ or a character in a play and she was method acting, but nowhere do I like the idea of a "Hannah Montana"-multiple identities shtick scenario for MJ.

So, maybe this is going to be like Ned and Flash (if Zendaya does become or is MJ) something I am going to have to just bite my tongue and get used to or try to accept, but right now... I'm going to keep calling her Michelle. Until we get an exact quote from Watts, Sony, Marvel Studios, or Zendaya herself or a script leaks, she's going to remain Michelle to me and I think this thread should be titled going forward:

"The Zendaya is Michelle Possibly Mary Jane Thread."

It would only be fair. When you read "is Mary Jane Thread", I am glad the "is" is not capitalized like IS as if it is confirmed, but I think it's quite premature to call her or make a thread stating she is Mary Jane or people keep referring to her as indeed being Mary Jane when we still have no confirmation saying otherwise by the big people in charge.

leo-toast-9.w529.h352.gif
 
But the relevance for this thread is whether MJ's hair dyeing is going to be a small and random detail of her backstory too. And I don't think it would be, since she's always been known as a redhead. Fans don't need to feel that she's earned that red hair or that we need to see some kind of progression towards it, otherwise it won't feel natural.

It's something she could easily have had from the beginning, and is in fact something she's always had. It's not part of a makeover and transformation process from awkward ugly duckling to gregarious hottie and party girl.

Yeah, I don't get why they think we'd need this either. It was already silly when Singer did it with Rogue 16 years ago, and this year we saw it happen again with Luthor's baldness... I dunno, I guess they think it's clever or something.

agreed.

the no red hair and the name switch are the silliest parts, imo.

if you are going to race change the character, fine. if you are going to change her personality around, ok - I guess.

but at least call her Mary Jane and at least give her red hair.
 
I still don't understand why would they deliberately hide that Z playing Mary Jane to make it a surprise. I guess not initially confirming that Tony and Laura were Flash and Liz was one thing, but Mary Jane? Why hide a coveted role like this, when every "scooper" under the sun would've done anything in their power to dig out what the deal with the Michelle character was. It's 2016, Marvel can't possibly be stupid enough to think they could keep something like this a secret.
 
Last edited:
I still don't understand why would they deliberately hide that Z playing Mary Jane to make it a surprise. I guess not initially confirming that Tony and Laura were Flash and Liz was one thing, but Mary Jane? Why hide a coveted role like this, when every "scooper" under the sun would've done anything in their power to dig out what the deal with the Michelle character was. It's 2016, Marvel can't possibly be stupid enough to think they could keep something like this a secret.

shhhh........It's a surprise!!

tumblr_lxyxxivvb01qm6oc3o3_250.gif
 
I'm glad I took a bit of a break from the MJ/Michelle fiasco. Let's see what's new.

"- She is Mary Jane. Here's why...

- No, she is Michelle, here's why..."


Okay, back to the Justice League boards.

Seriously, Im excited for this movie but every time I visit this these boards I'm rolling my eyes so bad. I can't believe it but I think I like the One Direction/Harry Styles fans better. At least they are useful to find information!
 
I still don't understand why would they deliberately hide that Z playing Mary Jane to make it a surprise. I guess not initially confirming that Tony and Laura were Flash and Liz was one thing, but Mary Jane? Why hide a coveted role like this, when every "scooper" under the sun would've done anything in their power to dig out what the deal with the Michelle character was. It's 2016, Marvel can't possibly be stupid enough to think they could keep something like this a secret.

Probably because of the reaction of the fanboys (always overreacting and hating before actually seing something).
 
Yeah, I don't get why they think we'd need this either. It was already silly when Singer did it with Rogue 16 years ago, and this year we saw it happen again with Luthor's baldness... I dunno, I guess they think it's clever or something.

What's with super hero media and the characters not becoming "the character" until the end. It's really annoying
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"