Tim Roth is Emil Blonsky/Abomination in The Incredible Hulk!

I'm not going to stay here arguing with you. We can agree to disagree. You think action is most important, I'm fine with that, I just like logic to be at the forefront.

Well it's discussing it, what this place is for lol. Also I didn't say action is the most important, I said as long as the action is good enough the general public will not care about Abomb's look. If the new Abomb look is logical why do his ears disappear? Why does his manhood disappear? Why do his bones break off to become weapons? If you want to end it there though fair do's, agree to disagree.
 
Wait, wait, this is what's new, right? Follow me around the forums. Ah, I see......:o

Nah, I was reading through this thread, which is in my User CP, and couldn't help but comment on this. You tried to pwn him but failed miserably. Good effort, though. :up:
 
I knew that, after all the bickering that's been going on here, I'd find a new signature.
 
Well it's discussing it, what this place is for lol. Also I didn't say action is the most important, I said as long as the action is good enough the general public will not care about Abomb's look. If the new Abomb look is logical why do his ears disappear? Why does his manhood disappear? Why do his bones break off to become weapons? If you want to end it there though fair do's, agree to disagree.

I never said the new design was logical. The fact that he is sans ears and manhood needs a good explanation.
 
Abomination does not look any more menacing than the Hulk, which is the problem. Also, all the bones popping out? Silly.

I don't care about whether it's logical or not, or whether he looks like his comic counterpart, but this just isn't that cool looking.
 
Nah, I was reading through this thread, which is in my User CP, and couldn't help but comment on this. You tried to pwn him but failed miserably. Good effort, though. :up:

I didn't try to pwn anyone, Mr. KnowItAll.






IDIOT.
 
I never said the new design was logical. The fact that he is sans ears and manhood needs a good explanation.

Yeah it does but do you think it will? I highly doubt we will but the general public won't care, well apart from the occassional guy shouting out 'Where's his wang?' lol.
 
So what? I didn't know it was a word, I learned something new. I don't see what the hell's so funny.
 
So what? I didn't know it was a word, I learned something new. I don't see what the hell's so funny.


What's funny is that you tried to be mean to me because you thought I made a typo, but it blew up in your face when you revealed your ignorance. It is rather jocular; not that you didn't know the word, but the circumstance in which you revealed that fact.
 
I don't think it matters if you introduce reptilian DNA into the syrum, aspects have already been taken from the last film into this one, the reptilian thing wouldn't impact it greatly, one line of 'It uses reptilian DNA for regenerative abilities' and that's it, done with, we'd have classic abomb.

I've actually already posted a reason for a reptilian Abomination that not only distances itself from Ang Lee's movie but also follows the rationale that brought us the design we have now.

That's all well and good if you're a fan who's been to the Hype numerous times to read about this new movie from Day 1 and how it's a new continuity, but John and/or Jane Q. Public don't follow these sorts of things as closely (You know, not being obsessive Hulk fans and all.) so they, not being you, would think this movies was a sequel to Ang Lee's movie because that would be the only thing they'd heard of. See where I'm coming from?
 
What's funny is that you tried to be mean to me because you thought I made a typo, but it blew up in your face when you revealed your ignorance. It is rather jocular; not that you didn't know the word, but the circumstance in which you revealed that fact.


Still, it's not that big of a deal.
 
What's funny is that you tried to be mean to me because you thought I made a typo, but it blew up in your face when you revealed your ignorance. It is rather jocular; not that you didn't know the word, but the circumstance in which you revealed that fact.


Still, it's not that big of a deal.
 
if its not a big deal, then why are troubled by it.

but it was funny for the moment.
 
Leterrier's Abomb is a huge step up from the comics Abomb.

His reasoning on the change makes sense,he looks true to the name Abomination.

And let's face it,in the comics he's pretty much Hulk with scales and fishy ears.It's funny how people are getting bugged by this.
 
Leterrier's Abomb is a huge step up from the comics Abomb.

His reasoning on the change makes sense,he looks true to the name Abomination.

And let's face it,in the comics he's pretty much Hulk with scales and fishy ears.It's funny how people are getting bugged by this.
:up::up:exactly man
 
So? The comic book Abomination looked stupid; a sort of fish-body builder hybrid.
that doesnt explain why Blonsky doesnt have a single characteristic (as far as i'm aware of) from the comic other than his name. oh yah and having a wife:whatever:

and i guarentee that if they presented a comic faithful rendition of Abomination in the trailer, everyone would think the one they chose looked stupid compared
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"