Thank You

Hi all, nice to join the boards!
I love comics, i love heroes, i love DC and Marvel movies. Well, i knew that some hero movies was quite well and some not. There are top major quality productions like Spidey and X-Men or Batman Begins, and there are some minority titles made just for pure fun, hype, young audience and merchandinsing. Some of there are for example Elektra, Catwoman or The Punisher. I must admit that cinematic version of Daredevil was so lousy but i loved the DC and i'm a great fan of the character so i can understand that my opinion on it is particular. I loved the Punisher for the amusement instead of the plot that fleshed off the original spirit of the Frank Castle character, but i must admit that the overall movie was lousy.
GR for me it's a lousy movie with also no amusement and no style. It's really empty, like Catwoman.
Think about that:
- Grab a camera and some friends. One should be a cute guy, one possibly a nice chick;
- Get a skull mask and make some kind of puppet with pillows dressed with black clothes and some chains;
- Bring the Blaze role to the cool guy and the chick role to the chick;
- Take the camera. Three, two, one, shot both talking about everything they want;
- Ok, put down camera. Take a friend and take the skull puppet made;
- Wash the puppet's head with combustible;
- Bring your friend down on knees asking him to keep the puppet in the middle of the air;
- Light on fire the puppet and shot just him from the torso cutting the friend off of the camera, making sure the puppet is facing the chick who must scream like "whoa! Johnny..."
Now watch what you've done and telling to everyone that you made a great GR movie.
Now you can use some of the excuses to proof it:
1) If someone blames you for the poor dialog, tells him that he's watching a movie about a biker who becomes a flaming skull, so does not need a philosofical or deeper line to act, it's just a movie for fun;
2) If someone blames your for the poor acting, tells him that the cool friend/chick are hot, so whatever... it's not important a great acting because it's just a movie for fun and not a Kubrick or Scorsese drama;
3) If someone blames you for the poor visual effects, tells him that he can't expect nothing more than a flaming skull, and it is. Nevermind if it seems not real, he's watching a movie about a biker who becomes a flaming skull, so does not need a natural aspect, it must be get with fantasy, it's just a movie for fun...
That was Ghost Rider. I was plenty of hopeness for the Cage presence regarding 1) Good acting e 2) Good fidelity with the spirit of the comic book, since cage it's a GR fan (from now the worst, i suppose).
I can understand that the movie needed to become more softly regarding the comic atmospheres, since it must be delivered to families and childrens and so on... but it was a total wasting of money and passion.
If on a side it has NO nucleus and no storytelling, on the other side it showed a ridicolus fx, boring acting, non-sense scenes, and no coreography in action scenes, just a short "make your move and i'll make mine".
I remind that at least, in The Punisher, there was an epic fight with the Russian. Some light of cool thinking in a low (quality, not budget) production. Here's nothing. 120 millions wasted. It could be fun for kids and teenagers, and this can collocate the movie on the same level of Batman & Robin, Catwoman, Buffy, Mortal Kombat Annilhation, and so on.
I'm sorry, because since i appreciated Daredevil i believed in MJS. I'm really sorry.