not_a_victim
Sidekick
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
- Messages
- 2,059
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
true, but Brock wouldn't get a great amount of screentime in spidey2 due to the fact that there was Ock's origin and peter losing his power's. so I think it was better that he was introduced in SM3 because there is a great deal of screen time available for him because this film is mostly about the symbiote and how it take's over. in fact there are plenty of way's that Venom could have been the main villian, but I think one of the reason's sandman was the main villian was because he has a big connection with the death of uncle ben. not to mention that the death of uncle ben is a huge thing not only in the film's but all through the spidey comic's. your observation was good but I just don't think that would happen in a such a good manor. too many thing's would be going on in spidey2 making it so that Brock's screentime might indeed be lowered down just to a cameo appearance. Quite frankly, Eddie Brock's story should stay the way it is and tell eddie brock's story all through this film and toward's the end he get's the symbiote. that's just the way I see it though, if they did it in SM1 then Brock's appearance would be just cameo due to the simple fact that there was more than one origin to tell.
You're quite right about Brock and screentime in SMII. It would have to be limited in order to not get a "crammed" feeling for the movie, like SMIII has the potential to. Even if we just get an intoduction to the character and a few minutes of screentime, it would be more fluid than just dropping Brock into SMIII, and trying get us to care about him or who he is, and suddenly make him the biggest threat in SPidey's carreer.
The way it is now, Brock is just gonna seem like a jerk, who possibly gets what he deserves. If we were to see the rise and fall of Brock, we might care a little more.