The Amazing Spider-Man When and how should Gwen Stacy die? - Part 1

If there are people on this board that don't think Gwen should die...


Your opinions are bad and you should feel bad.
 
Nope. Look at the beginning of their relationship. They were constantly at odds. Even though Gwen was studious, she also loved to hang out and party. She wasn't as extreme as MJ was said to be (Even though this was never actually shown- but since she was running with Harry and Harry did drugs one can suppose that she indulged a bit herself) but she certainly was never presented as being timid. Please point to a story that suggests this. Since I have every issue, I'll be happy to verify. Then later, Gwen was getting more involved in activism; student protests, environmentally, politically, and she would come down on Peter for his lack of interest (Even though we know why he couldn't spare the time) She was constantly wondering where he was running to and why. So they weren't perfectly matched. Or no more so than any couple who while being different, still have a love and respect for each other. It was the same with Peter and MJ.


And Gwen was hardly perfect in the flawless sense. She made mistakes, had a hot temper and was quick to belt someone who pissed her off. If anyone who's actually read the comics suggests she's perfect, it's as in she's the best choice for Peter. Which I agree with.



Black Cat was certainly a serious love interest at one point. Peter was considering a life with her and made many overtures to see to it that it happened. He just ultimately realized that it wouldn't work and he wanted to be with MJ.



Every character is boring for that reason. There is not a one character that is inherently boring. It's only the way that the writer presents them as being.

But some characters have more dramatic punch than others. Based on who they are, their background and environment they can have a lot or little built in drama.

I'm saying that in the case of a human character involved with a super human character, for the relationship to be interesting beyond the "chase/ will they-won't they point- the human character has to bring some interesting baggage to the table, that rivals the hero's drama. While Peter is out constantly risking his life, his wife looking for acting gigs, possibly being a hostage, maybe being attracted to another man, and maybe getting pregnant is interesting for but so long. With Gwen, there was a lot more potential, even though the other stuff is there as well. It's just that the writers didn't have the vision to see it.



MJ being the "public eye" character was solely because Marvel pushed her that way. They made the wedding a media event that went beyond the comics, having actors play them at Shea Stadium, home of the then World Champion Mets. They published artwork focusing only on MJ. Toys, etc. She was the love interest in the multi-billion dollar movie franchise. They made stories that centered on her and even whole comic book titles. They didn't do any of that with supporting characters (non-super ones at least) when Gwen was around.

And while yes, the MJ relationship lasted longer, Marvel had constantly been trying to jettison it. They've made no less than five attempts to end the relationship. But they knew they couldn't kill her off as with Gwen. And mind you- there was plenty of public outrage with Gwen's death as well. Sales dropped on the book.

but that's also "the beginning" of their relationship... Gwen and MJ actually had a bit more in common with each other in the beginning of their relationship than Peter and Gwen did.. but her character evolved. It's not about where they "began" but where they end up.

but don't you see ... you just described later Gwen as pretty much a perfect match. they were both doing what they thought to be heroic. Peter just wore a mask and costume, gwen did it through activism and protesting. She ironically would get on him about his lack of enthusiasm when essentially he was out every night doing the same thing.. just as a vigilante.


Black Cat was a serious love interest TO peter... but NOT TO Felicia. that's what sets that relationship apart from being a real "serious" relationship. Black Cat ultimately became the "fun fling" the girl you always had a great time with, was a fun friend, and the passion was hot. but ultimately together you weren't the settle down type. And that stuck with her after their original "relationship" ended. This is why she was so easy to write.. there was no commitments, and no future. It's why they ultimately had him cheat on peter with the Foreigner which prompted him to get back with MJ.

I only see 2 ways gwen could have went had she not died...
1) she became carly cooper (who was boring as all hell), who was basically a modern interpretation of gwen anyway, though she'd know who peter was.

or

2) peter never told her his identity.. and the relationship drama and confliction came from that (which to be honest would have gotten stale quick anyway.

it why MJ was just a better fit for him imo. Though.. ultimately they wrote her into a hole

and yes.. i'm aware of all the gwen drama, and spidey marriage drama. However.. it doesn't really change the fact that MJ is cemented in history as his #1 love interest.. and the Minnie moue to his mickey, and the Lois Lane to his Clark Kent.. weather people agree with it or not.
 
add to that.. with her father's death (whom she blamed spider-man for), and he father's line of work that got him killed. I'm not entirely sure Comic Gwen would have been able to handle Peter's secret life.. or ever agree to it. It's also where Movie Gwen is a bit different than comic
 
but that's also "the beginning" of their relationship... Gwen and MJ actually had a bit more in common with each other in the beginning of their relationship than Peter and Gwen did.. but her character evolved. It's not about where they "began" but where they end up.

Not at all. Where they begin is the establishment of the character. The defining of who they are. A character can go off course if the writer isn't very good. But then a good writer can come back in and take the character "back to basics" have them return to their roots. Peter and Gwen's relationship only went off course when Stan left and you had a writer who wasn't interested in the character take over.

but don't you see ... you just described later Gwen as pretty much a perfect match. they were both doing what they thought to be heroic. Peter just wore a mask and costume, gwen did it through activism and protesting. She ironically would get on him about his lack of enthusiasm when essentially he was out every night doing the same thing.. just as a vigilante.

But that doesn't make them the same person. I've already pointed out how in both doing what they thought was right- it caused a rift between them. And that could have easily continued to spark drama. The differences between Peter and MJ were meaningless. They created nothing. Any rifts between them had already been covered by Peter/Gwen and Peter/Betty Throughout their marriage, MJ was nothing more than a prop. Sexy window dressing or potential hostage.

Black Cat was a serious love interest TO peter... but NOT TO Felicia. that's what sets that relationship apart from being a real "serious" relationship. Black Cat ultimately became the "fun fling" the girl you always had a great time with, was a fun friend, and the passion was hot. but ultimately together you weren't the settle down type. And that stuck with her after their original "relationship" ended. This is why she was so easy to write.. there was no commitments, and no future. It's why they ultimately had him cheat on peter with the Foreigner which prompted him to get back with MJ.

The relationship was also serious to Black Cat. She underwent surgery to remove her "bad luck" powers :whatever: to protect Peter, which made her more vulnerable. Yes, in the end, it was decided that they wouldn't last. But it was certainly seriously considered at one point.

I only see 2 ways gwen could have went had she not died...
1) she became carly cooper (who was boring as all hell), who was basically a modern interpretation of gwen anyway, though she'd know who peter was.

or

2) peter never told her his identity.. and the relationship drama and confliction came from that (which to be honest would have gotten stale quick anyway.

Yeah. That's all that the writers saw. That's the problem. There were loads of other things that could've been done. Let's say everything was the same up to ASM #121, but she didn't die. Immediately drama is sparked because she'd be wondering why the f--- the Goblin figured he could use her against Spider-Man.

it why MJ was just a better fit for him imo. Though.. ultimately they wrote her into a hole

MJ was equally boring. That's why they kept removing her. The only drama with MJ was her and Peter getting together after a split. They could never think of what to do with her after she and Peter reconnected. Because again, a modeling/acting career doesn't stand out next to Spidey's life. But Gwen could have gone in more interesting and exciting directions.

and yes.. i'm aware of all the gwen drama, and spidey marriage drama. However.. it doesn't really change the fact that MJ is cemented in history as his #1 love interest.. and the Minnie moue to his mickey, and the Lois Lane to his Clark Kent.. weather people agree with it or not.

Only because of longetivity. not because of good stories. Just as it's really difficult to remember anything Minnie Mouse actually did, it's equally difficult to remember anything from MJ other than "Face it Tiger..." There's nothing unique to the character.

add to that.. with her father's death (whom she blamed spider-man for), and he father's line of work that got him killed. I'm not entirely sure Comic Gwen would have been able to handle Peter's secret life.. or ever agree to it. It's also where Movie Gwen is a bit different than comic

Gwen consistently showed bravery in the face of danger ASM #61,83,92,103,104,108,109,117- She kept saying to Peter that she wanted to face whatever dangers he was dealing with by his side. And she was a scrapper. In the comics she was actually tougher than what was shown in the film. And in MJ's early brushes with danger, she completely freaked. So, if she could be written to be accepting of Peter's secret, Gwen could have even more so.
 
If there are people on this board that don't think Gwen should die...


Your opinions are bad and you should feel bad.
:doh: And that would be because... What? Because I see the possibilities for a character and don't feel the need to limit their potential?
 
then fine. i'll probably just put dagen on ignore where he belongs anyway...
Wow.:woot: Dude you need to grow a sense of fun. This is exactly what happens when someone can't just enjoy something.
he ignores any posts with any poignancy anyway (because lets face it.. he believes as long as you think she should die, you have nothing valid to say anyway)
If they're arguments had anything more to say than "Because it happened in the comics!" then yeah, maybe I would, but that's essentially the jist of everyone's comments.
 
The sequel to Amazing Spider-Man hasn't been made yet. You have an issue with how the death was portrayed in the comics, more specifically how Peter's character was depicted afterwards. But now we aren't talking about the comics anymore, lets talk about the sequel to the film. As I said the moment could be inspired and adapted perfectly in such a way that Peter does grow from it. Do you not agree that this could be done properly?

I mean jesus, many of you are so adamant that killing Gwen off is the wrong way to go and that its cliche, overdone, or just plainly in bad taste. But you are basing all that off of something that happened in comics almost 40 years ago.

I can secede that yes, a decent, entertaining Spider-Man movie can be made without the death of Gwen Stacy (heck 4 of them have already). But if you don't believe that her death COULD, possibly be done in film in such a way that the hero grows from it. And in a way that is not only emotionally resonant but also original and maybe even beautiful, well... then you are lacking in imagination and not being very diplomatic about this discussion. Close-minded is another appropriate term.

EDIT: Much of this is geared toward other posters, not just you Dragon.
The same thing could be said to you, who thinks that the only conclusion to Gwen's journey is death. Close-minded.
 
The same thing could be said to you, who thinks that the only conclusion to Gwen's journey is death. Close-minded.
Well, to be fair, the conclusion to everyone's journey is their inevitable death :oldrazz:
 
The sequel to Amazing Spider-Man hasn't been made yet. You have an issue with how the death was portrayed in the comics, more specifically how Peter's character was depicted afterwards. But now we aren't talking about the comics anymore, lets talk about the sequel to the film. As I said the moment could be inspired and adapted perfectly in such a way that Peter does grow from it. Do you not agree that this could be done properly?

I mean jesus, many of you are so adamant that killing Gwen off is the wrong way to go and that its cliche, overdone, or just plainly in bad taste. But you are basing all that off of something that happened in comics almost 40 years ago.

I can secede that yes, a decent, entertaining Spider-Man movie can be made without the death of Gwen Stacy (heck 4 of them have already). But if you don't believe that her death COULD, possibly be done in film in such a way that the hero grows from it. And in a way that is not only emotionally resonant but also original and maybe even beautiful, well... then you are lacking in imagination and not being very diplomatic about this discussion. Close-minded is another appropriate term.

EDIT: Much of this is geared toward other posters, not just you Dragon.

The same thing could be said to you, who thinks that the only conclusion to Gwen's journey is death. Close-minded.

Aw, thats cute. You didn't read my post. Well thats okay, let me bold some of it for you. And in case you still can't find it. Here's some extra help:

"I can secede that yes, a decent, entertaining Spider-Man movie can be made without the death of Gwen Stacy (heck 4 of them have already)."

YOUR TURN.
 
The same thing could be said to you, who thinks that the only conclusion to Gwen's journey is death. Close-minded.

The fact you don't think it can conclude with death is close minded!

EDIT: Its an iconic moment thats been recreated in several forms of media, usually with MJ granted, and hell I wouldn't have had a problem with MJ dying in Spider-Man Peter ending up with Gwen. It's the scenario people are interested in not the girl. The fact is that Peter doesnt end up with Gwen and theres no point in wasting our time starting with her unless they're going to use the opportunity to tell a story.
 
Aw, thats cute. You didn't read my post. Well thats okay, let me bold some of it for you. And in case you still can't find it. Here's some extra help:

"I can secede that yes, a decent, entertaining Spider-Man movie can be made without the death of Gwen Stacy (heck 4 of them have already)."

YOUR TURN.
"decent" is a plausibly deniable way of calling something mediocre, so yeah, I read it. I should've been clearer though. You see the death of Gwen as being the only means for the movie to be great. Which is, in fact, incorrect. If there is a great writer and director and cast involved, you don't need death for the movie to be truly powerful, beautiful, and great. Death is a cop-out for filmakers who can't create greatness and beauty from life. And you can cut with the childish crap, there's no excuse for it.
 
The fact you don't think it can conclude with death is close minded!

EDIT: Its an iconic moment thats been recreated in several forms of media, usually with MJ granted, and hell I wouldn't have had a problem with MJ dying in Spider-Man Peter ending up with Gwen. It's the scenario people are interested in not the girl. The fact is that Peter doesnt end up with Gwen and theres no point in wasting our time starting with her unless they're going to use the opportunity to tell a story.
I've actually said a few times that it could, constructed a scenario of it, and agreed with a few people on it, which you choose to ignore. Interesting. We wouldn't even be having this conversation if the character was MJ and not Gwen. And I've never said Peter/Gwen should end up together, in fact I've said that I don't want them to. It's like you don't pay attention to me at all anymore. That really hurts, you know. What happened to the good old days? Back early in our relationship? *cries* :)
 
Last edited:
"decent" is a plausibly deniable way of calling something mediocre, so yeah, I read it. I should've been clearer though. You see the death of Gwen as being the only means for the movie to be great. Which is, in fact, incorrect. If there is a great writer and director and cast involved, you don't need death for the movie to be truly powerful, beautiful, and great. Death is a cop-out for filmakers who can't create greatness and beauty from life. And you can cut with the childish crap, there's no excuse for it.

What feelings change a person more? Happiness and beauty or heart break and agony and learning to over come it? No you don't need death, but he fact is theres no reason to even include Gwen if you're not going to adapt that story. Sam Raimi didn't put Mary Jane in the movie because he had to, he put her in because he, James Cameron, and all of the writers before him never planned on adapting the Night Gwen Stacy died and if you just want a love interest then her role can easily be filled by one of Spider-Mans more popular characters. Also how many of these "talented writers" who deviate, end up with something better than the comics...? Thought so.
 
What feelings change a person more? Happiness and beauty or heart break and agony and learning to over come it? No you don't need death, but he fact is theres no reason to even include Gwen if you're not going to adapt that story. Sam Raimi didn't put Mary Jane in the movie because he had to, he put her in because he, James Cameron, and all of the writers before him never planned on adapting the Night Gwen Stacy died and if you just want a love interest then her role can easily be filled by one of Spider-Mans more popular characters. Also how many of these "talented writers" who deviate, end up with something better than the comics...? Thought so.
Hey! You didn't give me any time to answer! :D I'll tell you what, you lay out a list movies you feel have "deviated" from the comics, explain why you feel that way, and I'll give my personal perception, when I can, on what is better, TO ME. Ya see how that works?
 
This is insane. Like literally insane. Doing the same s*** over and over again and expecting different results. Insane, I tell ya! Insane!
 
Hey! You didn't give me any time to answer! :D I'll tell you what, you lay out a list movies you feel have "deviated" from the comics, explain why you feel that way, and I'll give my personal perception, when I can, on what is better, TO ME. Ya see how that works?

2311268-tumblr_lfg4jlpxsl1qcirj4o1_500.jpg


Electric%2BDoom.jpg


alicia1.jpg


(This one's debatable but none the less)
the-penguin.jpg


images


largeeddie20brock20transformed20into20venomjxdi1c5_2.jpg


2007_ghost_rider_006.jpg


174433__catwoman_l.jpg


cap005.jpg


I could go on forever really but I think I made my point.
 
Last edited:
Oh it's fantastic. So after all this discussion, can we agree to disagree? I think the best way is to kill Gwen, You think that it isn't the best way?
Well, WE settled our dispute awhile back, didn't we?
 
2311268-tumblr_lfg4jlpxsl1qcirj4o1_500.jpg


Electric%2BDoom.jpg


alicia1.jpg


(This one's debatable but none the less)
the-penguin.jpg


images


largeeddie20brock20transformed20into20venomjxdi1c5_2.jpg


2007_ghost_rider_006.jpg


174433__catwoman_l.jpg


cap005.jpg


I could go on forever really but I think I made my point.

penguin was a good change (i'll give dagen that one...) but.. where's SandMan? Cyclops? Rogue? DeadpoolX? Phoenix? Nuclear man? Steel?

edit: nvm i see DP :D
 
penguin was a good change (i'll give dagen that one...) but.. where's SandMan? Cyclops? Rogue? DeadpoolX? Phoenix? Nuclear man? Steel?

edit: nvm i see DP :D

I was only allowed 10 images lol I started off with like 30 :/

I thought about Nuclear man and richard pryor but I since that was completely made up I sure if I should include them. I forgot about steel, and there were so many from X3 and Wolverine i just decided to go with an example that sums it all up :dpf: Also I said Penguin is debatable because it seems everyone either loves or hates it, never really seen anyone who's in the middle.
 
I was only allowed 10 images lol I started off with like 30 :/

I thought about Nuclear man and richard pryor but I since that was completely made up I sure if I should include them. I forgot about steel, and there were so many from X3 and Wolverine i just decided to go with an example that sums it all up :dpf: Also I said Penguin is debatable because it seems everyone either loves or hates it, never really seen anyone who's in the middle.

lol hell you coulda just put Gene Hackman as Lex to show what's wrong with the superman films :-P
 
lol hell you coulda just put Gene Hackman as Lex to show what's wrong with the superman films :-P

It was hard to remember which ones were which, the only ones i wanted to make sure made it were doom, deadpool, catwoman, bane, and galactus. I ended up deleting sandman, new goblin, and super skull human torch too.

EDIT:

LOL speaking of whats wrong with superman

Lenny.jpg
 

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,368
Messages
22,092,894
Members
45,887
Latest member
Barryg
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"