KangConquers
Purple Kang, Purple Kang
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2004
- Messages
- 7,153
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 33
You've raised the bar lately.
I think I'm good, I'm only 20
I could personally do with out Kang though. Out of all the avengers villains that we are hoping for, he's probbably my least favorite. Wouldn't bother me if we never see him
Kang is basically their arch-enemy. An Avengers franchise without Kang is as incomplete as Iron Man without the Mandarin.
See, for me, that character is Ultron
See, for me, that character is Ultron
Speaking of Avengers Forever, it's been (?)15(?) years now and no one's made Songbird an Avenger yet. What the hell
Ultron has crossed over into a lot more multi-media and into the mainstream more, but in terms of what has occurred between the covers of the Avengers comics, Kang has had more major stories, with higher stakes.
Ultron to me has a lot of filler appearances, with only maybe two or three good stories, and is too focused on two or three members of the team to really be called the arch-enemy. Kang's focus is on all/ any Avengers, and every time he appears, it's a huge event.
Kang vs. The Grandmaster, The Celestial Madonna Saga, Avengers Forever, the Kang Dynasty, and the First Young Avengers arc are all brilliant. I suggest you check those out before writing off one of the major characters in the MU.
Ok yeah. I mean. it's personal. I never was a HUGE fan of Kang. To be flat out honest with you guys (I'm about to receive flack probably lol) but I would probably sigh at the confirmation of Kang being the villain in one of the avengers movies.
But I guess I am weird like that
If Kang's as brutal and awesome in the movies as he's in the Ultimate Comics (There Ultimate Reed Richards has basically become the Ultimate Marvel version of Kang.) then a movie with him could have the potencial to beat the Thanos storyline
Kang blew up Washington D.C. in the 616 comics. I'd say he's plenty brutal.
Thanos destroyed the marvel universe lol, in terms of being brutal, Thanos takes the cake lol
Nah, that's just supremely evil. "Brutal" is a level of violence that is jaw-droppingly vicious and animalistic. Sentry ripping Ares in half is brutal; Joker murdering a child in "Death in the Family" is brutal; Dr. Light raping Ralph Dibney's wife is brutal; Hank Pym backhanding Janet Van Dyne across the room is brutal. Idly waving your hand and causing a gazillion aliens that you never see, let alone have even a smidgen of a vested emotional interest in, to suddenly vanish from existence isn't brutal.
Nah, that's just supremely evil. "Brutal" is a level of violence that is jaw-droppingly vicious and animalistic. Sentry ripping Ares in half is brutal; Joker murdering a child in "Death in the Family" is brutal; Dr. Light raping Ralph Dibney's wife is brutal; Hank Pym backhanding Janet Van Dyne across the room is brutal. Idly waving your hand and causing a gazillion aliens that you never see, let alone have even a smidgen of a vested emotional interest in, to suddenly vanish from existence isn't brutal.
How about the Hood? He seems like a swell villain.
Nah, that's just supremely evil. "Brutal" is a level of violence that is jaw-droppingly vicious and animalistic. Sentry ripping Ares in half is brutal; Joker murdering a child in "Death in the Family" is brutal; Dr. Light raping Ralph Dibney's wife is brutal; Hank Pym backhanding Janet Van Dyne across the room is brutal. Idly waving your hand and causing a gazillion aliens that you never see, let alone have even a smidgen of a vested emotional interest in, to suddenly vanish from existence isn't brutal.
How about the Hood? He seems like a swell villain.