Rowsdower!
Avenger
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
- Messages
- 27,929
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 31
Yeah, I'm not saying they absolutely have to follow the Batman Begins-TDK-TDKR pattern, but I think Doomsday should be saved for part 3.
I'm probably ruining my pitch, but as a secondary villain, I wouldn't mind seeing a cyber-mischief causing hacker who goes by the tag Mxyzptlk be a force of mayhem that Clark & Lois have to solve.. (and of course, I'm basing this on the notion that Goyer/Nolan would likely dump the angle of the 5th dimension imp with reality-warping magic). Multiple disasters could be caused which would prompt Superman to rescue various sets of people, potentially worldwide. Computer terror/crime is the closest "real-world" application of "magic" to be able to affect distant parts of the world with but a keystroke.
We've seen in other films (Die Hard 4 comes to mind) at the type of (action movie) disruptions that can take place with a dedicated hacker (or a team of them-- maybe one is M, another ix X, Y, Z, etc.)
Assuming that the producers would want to go with a "traditional" Mxy stature, then maybe he can be played by Peter Dinklage..
I don't really understand why people want to go for the cartoony villains like Mr Mxyzptlk or Bizarro. I think we should focus on villains that fit with the tone of the first Man of Steel movie and could be a good follow-up villain to Zod. I really don't see how the cartoony villains could fit. Personally I want to see Lex Luthor(which is a given), Metallo(good chance), Doomsday, and maybe shoehorn in mentions of Darkseid/Apokolips or Brainiac(they're better for JL movies).
Doomsday? Doomsday as a character is just sorta underwhelming. I mean, he isn't Bane, where he had a character, was a foil to Batman, and all that from the get-go. He's just a generic villain who kills Superman, but lacks personality or a real identity on his own.
He's definitely cool, though, and a threat.
But on his own? Not a very imposing villain...
Honestly, I just can't help but feel that Lex Luthor has been so overexposed over the years to be reused as the primary villain. Even if they were include someone like Metallo in there. He should be brought back, but I think he should be secondary to Brainiac with his rivalry with Superman culminating in the third film.
To me we have never seen the Lex I want to see, the version from TAS. The mega rich business man who is in bed with the military when it comes to developing cutting edge tech. To me that version fits right in with the destruction of Metropolis and how we'd want to become better prepared for anymore alien threats given how easily they took care of the military and the fact the government still wont fully trust Superman, they'll always have a "What if?" scenario in mind.
They could possibly use Superman's newest villain if the comic is popular.
I think first LexCorp would build a kind of machine based army for the military, perhaps something like the Omac project, and then it escalates to being merged in secret with a human experiment which is where Metallo comes in as Lex's pawn against Superman but with his own agenda that makes it harder for Luthor to control him than he had bargained for.
Of course the latter part rests on how they work Kryptonite into the story and more importantly how Lex discovers that it's harmful to Superman.
It may annoy the purists, but I think it would be interesting to if Brainiac were to have a female voice, with the calm, cold tone of my Sat Nav.
I have to admit, since my other post, I've started to become more open to them possibly reusing Lex Luthor as the main threat again. So I'd have to agree with you that from a story perspective, that makes the most sense after the events of MOS.
I can't help but think though that they should include other physical threats in addition to possibly Metallo, like Parasite or Bizzaro, if they could make it work.