Thundercrack85
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2009
- Messages
- 21,668
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 33
Oh I don't think they reverse engineered anything.
It doesn't take alien tech for humans to build something that can't fly properly.
Even from a hardcore skeptic's POV it makes sense. The US military was seeing flying saucers buzzing their most secure facilities. They knew someone was building them. Of course they would try to build their own. They didn't want there to be a "flying saucer gap".
Unfortunately they all failed miserably.
I actually don't know if the Soviets did ever attempt to design a flying saucer of their own. The Germans had some prototypes, but nothing that flew. Apparently as late as the fifties people in the military believed that the Soviets were behind the saucers (or perhaps that was code).
It doesn't take alien tech for humans to build something that can't fly properly.
Even from a hardcore skeptic's POV it makes sense. The US military was seeing flying saucers buzzing their most secure facilities. They knew someone was building them. Of course they would try to build their own. They didn't want there to be a "flying saucer gap".
Unfortunately they all failed miserably.
I actually don't know if the Soviets did ever attempt to design a flying saucer of their own. The Germans had some prototypes, but nothing that flew. Apparently as late as the fifties people in the military believed that the Soviets were behind the saucers (or perhaps that was code).

Go do it!
t:
......
.....
......
) I went to the store to buy a newspaper is a modest claim. True, I could be lying. But you might accept my mere word as proof because the described action is so banal (people do buy newspapers, why would I lie about such a thing?). The discovery of a new species of salamander is more unusual. However, you might accept an article in National Geographic (with photos) as sufficient evidence for the finding (coupled with the knowledge that thousands of new species are discovered each year - and heres but one example). Faster-than-light neutrinos would be astonishing news; such a verdict would overthrow physics - an extraordinary claim. So a higher-than-normal degree of skepticism would be very prudent (correctly so, as it turned out).