That would be absolutely terrible.
Mystique has received more attention in these films than she has in the comics, and to be honest she doesn't deserve it. If Mystique wasn't being played by an Oscar winner, I would have hope that her role wouldn't be that big in the next film(or possibly not included at all) but that's highly unlikely.
I don't think she should have Anything to do with X-Force. Also, Psylocke as part of X-Force? No, Domino is actually an X-Force team member and should be in the X-Force film.
Oscar winners don't mean a damn thing in terms of screen time and focus in these movies. Halle Barry and Anna Paquin say hi.
The whole point of this movie was that things DON'T come full circle. That things have changed. Having it actually be Stryker would have completely gone against that idea.
My question is what does 1973 Logan actually remember now? Because during the film he knows he's in his future mind, but now that its been resolved his 1973 mind will be back. All of those relationships he made are pretty much gone, he would basically revert to his mind of waking up in the bedroom right? Similar to how he did when he first saw Stryker and didn't remember Charles/Beast.
That's the only thing that gives me pause even including him in Apoc, outside of making him a mind controlled Horseman as a side character and not a main focus. Why include him in the next outing if he has to meet all these characters again, doesn't seem right.
No, I think the way it ended tells people things are going in a different direction. We know what's up with Stryker, there's no mystery to that. This sets it up for the events of the altered timeline that follows.
Gives things a bit of a cliffhanger.
Hey, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. Which shows that Kinsberg (and the past writers for this series)needs a better grasp of the source material, because Mystique has oddly received more screen time than she deserves when compared to her role and importance in the comics.
"I had read Age of Apocalypse and most of the appearances of Apocalypse before thinking about the movie, but went back and reread it and I think one of the things that's most exciting about it is the potential for the visual scale of the movie, and so it is a larger story than even Days of Future Past," Kinberg explained. "In Days of Future Past, they're trying to stop something that's not extinction level in the moment, although it could be one day. There's not an immediacy in the plot and this is a plot that actually has extinction level stakes and is even more global than anything we've ever seen before. There's a lot of architecture from the stories that we'll be using. It will be about his character emotionally, you know, like who is he? Not just as a mutant, but as a person."
"The Apocalypse story has a lot of different ways of telling stories," he said. "That was one of the things that I liked about Days of Future Past: Doing a time travel movie where it's not just sending someone back in time, but actually intercutting between the past and the future that we really haven't seen in a movie before. Usually you have somebody go back and stay in the past the whole movie. Apocalypse has some, without getting into detail, as you know from the books, has some innovative, different ways of storytelling also."
http://moviepilot.com/posts/2014/05...ypse-1445786?lt_source=external,manual#!PXWqA
Also, another question,how are they going to get the metal out of Wolverine's body, from the looks of things Magneto got it right in there.
Oh yeah I can see WHY it was done, I just dont think it should have been. Some things are going to change, yes, but some things wont and shouldnt either. For example, Magneto is still going to be a bad guy.
For me, Wolverine HAS to go through the adamantium bonding experiment no matter what the timeline.
Also, another question,how are they going to get the metal out of Wolverine's body, from the looks of things Magneto got it right in there.
He wouldn't know about any of it. Remember when he came back for a few seconds during the Paris scene, he had no idea what the hell was going on.
The thing I think would be interesting if he does become a Horseman in the next film is that even though he wouldn't remember meeting them all before, Charles certainly would. He'd know what Logan had done for him when they'd met before, and would want to try and save him now, hopefully with his whole new team he has set up by then.
Charles seemed really happy to finally catch up with the Logan he'd met in 1973 at the end of DOFP. Before he realized he was back, Charles also seemed slightly irritated that Logan wasn't in his class, which led me to believe that whatever happened in between, Logan is still a bit of a pain in the ***.![]()
Doubtful, Logan would have recognised him when he had the memory loss freakout. That and Stryker would have clearly said something
Are you referring to 1973 Logan when he "awoke" briefly?
In the comics, after Magneto ripped out all of Wolverine's adamantium, Apocalypse was the one who ultimately put it back (as well as brainwash him into one of his horsemen).
So it's GOING to happen. Who's going to do it is the mystery now.
The rebar was all falling out of him when they took him out of the river. Don't know if it was all of it, but it was a lot of it, so it looks like he somewhat healed.
The rebar was all falling out of him when they took him out of the river. Don't know if it was all of it, but it was a lot of it, so it looks like he somewhat healed.