Joker needs to bite the heads off new born babies.
I disagree entirely.Yeah, I think that "will it be too dark for the children" is the wrong question to be asking in the first place. Just because this movie has an iconic superhero in it does not mean it has to pander to a particular audience at any moment in the film. Just make a good, tasteful Batman movie, consider that Batman is one of the 'darker' heroes anyway, and forget the fact that kids like Batman just because he's Batman. This movie already appears too dark for children, and that's a good thing to me considering the freedom you get when you are able to explore more adult/mature themes and characters (like the Joker) when treated responsibly. If this movie shocks parents by being too 'dark', then they're probably too dumb to investigate a movie's rating/content before they take their kids to it, and too dumb to appreciate what the movie is.
I disagree entirely.
I think it's wrong to alienate children because comic fans feel they are more entitled to the character. This attitude is why comic books are failing in sales nowadays, they are too exclusive.
Batman should be a darker character, yes. But not so much that only we can enjoy it.
Well, duh. But that's not what i'm talking about. I just think a Batman film should be enjoyed by all ages.Look at 300, and Matrix Reloaded, content is not always a hinderence. Fox thinks so but look how much they have messed up with AvP FF, Live Free or Die Hard.
Content, does not matter, the only thing that really helps a movie like this sell, is if it is good or not.
Well, duh. But that's not what i'm talking about. I just think a Batman film should be enjoyed by all ages.
Why can't children enjoy dark movies as well? I was about four when my parents took me to see Batman '89 in theaters. It was a very dark movie, but I think I enjoyed it because of that. Batman Returns was even darker and I liked it even more. Batman is a much darker hero than most others, and parents should be well aware of that by now.I disagree entirely.
I think it's wrong to alienate children because comic fans feel they are more entitled to the character. This attitude is why comic books are failing in sales nowadays, they are too exclusive.
Batman should be a darker character, yes. But not so much that only we can enjoy it.
BatMan is strictly for teens and adults PERIOD!!! Children of our day and age have already ruined SpiderMan and I could care less about SuperMan; so HANDS OFF!!!!![]()
Wow, no need to be a dick, which you seem to be right now.
I have never seen that quote from Nolan, and if he did say it, it would not surprise me if it was just to say to the general public so no crying typical American Moms would try and sue WB.
I think a lot of people forget when you are saying dark material it is not just clearly the visual aspect of something. Story lines can be adult, and complicated, and that is Nolan's style through and through, not just in his story telling, but his deepness, and also his non-linear editing, and quick paced story telling. To me Nolan's work has never been purley for kids, including BB, maybe it's my opinion but I don't think there is anything wrong with that.
Even if Nolan says that it is a family affair, I'm sure he is not saying bring your 8 year old kid, those are the ones you hear screaming or crying in the theatres when there are creepy parts like Crane, and his toxin. And trust me I bet TDK will be much more dark then BB.
And you say Troma that you read those when your were 9, but I bet you did not understand half of the material or deepness in any of those ones I mentioned. I know you will say you understood it all because you feel it will degrade you if you say other wise. But even as my self, as a 9 year old I knew the basic plots of all the movies I watched, but some of the meanings, and adult material. Perfect example even though it is a comedy is Naked Gun, when I was little I laughed at the obvious stuff, but when I got older I laughed even harder because we understand so much more of the adult material, which clearly Naked Gun was aimed more towards adults, even though it was PG-13 and little kids could go see it, if you have watched the movies you will know what I mean.
So I will say again, I bet when you were that age, you were not old enough to comprehend half of the material given to you in TKJ. And I bet with BB a lot of kids will not understand it.
I guess to re-define my statement is that is the movie to dark for kids? Thats subjective to opinion, and to each indvidual parent. Are they more complex with much more adult targeted themes, and complex story. Yes. Sorry to call you a dick man, but from what I read, you were being quite rude to a statment that I to that point had not heard Nolan say otherwise. So show me the source as well, before you just rip on some one for giving their opinion.
You can say F**K in a PG-13 surely?