bushgeneration said:Schumacher's Batman&Robin was quite overcrowded with characters, so there was no character development. Bad acting. Incoherence in general. Spidey 3 runs the risk of following the same path if Raimi loses his focus on the characters rather than the spectacle. Spectacle is great if it has substance.
theShape said:ehhh. i disagree. i enjoyed it, but it was the weakest entry story-wise. also, all the build-up of angel, juggernaut, beast, colossus, and the other newbies was completely unnecessary and a waste of time, cause they were only in the film for eye-candy purposes.
it was a cool story concept, with the cure and everything, but ratner did not pull it off well.
just my two cents.![]()
Majik1387 said:A grand total of 1 movie. The Phantom of the Opera.![]()
Dark Phantom said:How can you say that? the first Spiderman movie was the best in my opinion. It was that movie that grasped my attention to comics and making Spiderman my favorite superhero. Mind you that I'm only 14 years old and saw this movie when I was 10. Although I look at it now with the knowledge of the source material I still find it to be a great adaptation despite some of the things that strayed away.
I don't understnad what was wrong. the acting, pacing, the plot, character development? It was all done respectively. Besides, it was an origin film. Some factors wouldn't come inot play until the sequel. The Green Goblin became Marvel's "Joker" for me and it blew me away. Especially at the climax and all the way to Peter's "I'm Spiderman..."
It was epic and a milestone. I loved it more than SM2, although SM2 was superior with SFX.