I never was a big Crackdwown fan, but ill keep an eye on this new one.
It's a great multiplayer game for $20.Is Titanfall a good game? I realize it's short, and certainly not worth 60 dollars.
But is it worth let's say 20?
It's a great multiplayer game for $20.
I definitely would too. With any shooter, the campaign is what gives it all meaning and weight to me. But that aside the multiplayer of TitanFall is great and great for casuals and multiplayer veterans alike.the concept of Titanfall sounds really cool ( you get to pilot giant mechs!! ).
but, just like Destiny, I'd be way more interested in the game if it had a single player story/campaign mode ( at least Destiny has that ).
hopefully in Titanfall 2, they'll add a solo campaign mode.
I definitely would too. With any shooter, the campaign is what gives it all meaning and weight to me. But that aside the multiplayer of TitanFall is great and great for casuals and multiplayer veterans alike.
I definitely would too. With any shooter, the campaign is what gives it all meaning and weight to me. But that aside the multiplayer of TitanFall is great and great for casuals and multiplayer veterans alike.
but wouldn't that make it the same as destiny? no one had a problem throwing $60 for that game.yeah......but I wouldn't pay the full $60 for it. plus, you need Gold to play this game, right? since its entirely MP??
but wouldn't that make it the same as destiny? no one had a problem throwing $60 for that game.
The whole "it's not worth 60 bux" argument is a joke because it's so subjective. For instance someone can tell me Titanfall isn't worth 60 bux because there's no SP. Yet I can sink over 100 hours into the game when most SP games offer a fraction of that.
It's all about what you are looking to get out of a game.
The whole "it's not worth 60 bux" argument is a joke because it's so subjective. For instance someone can tell me Titanfall isn't worth 60 bux because there's no SP. Yet I can sink over 100 hours into the game when most SP games offer a fraction of that.
It's all about what you are looking to get out of a game.
I have to disagree there. If you can't guarantee solid solo play, 60 dollars is one hell of an asking price.
but the game is dependent on others playing the game. AND you being online.
I've got a whole bunch of Ps2 games and anytime I got a feeling of going back to the old days, I can still play em. Hell even my Ps1 games. Before the semester started, just for the hell of it I was playing Tekken 4 and DBZ Legends for Ps2 and Ps1 respectively
10 years from now I highly doubt people will still be playing the original destiny and titanfall. because of that, you won't really be able to play it since there's no one else on it either. those games might just be bricks. but hey, i could be wrong.
AND you gotta be online; i remember reading the other day servers were down for destiny, which means you could not play the game at ALL. yeah obviously something like this doesn't happen every ****ing day but it happened once, it can happen again and again from time to time. there's no single player to resort to. so the $60 you spend for those times, is moot.
whereas $60 games that have single player campaigns, will always have single player campaigns. forever. it ain't subjective, not to me it ain't
That's all true but it's still based on what the user wants out of it. Its still subjective.
That's the last I'll say on it tho as this thread is already starting to go off topic of games. It's only a matter of time before we start talking about media features or hard drive space.
t:well I think it's got something to do with dragons.
btw, thread title...
"meat around the bone?" is that referring to wat I think it is?
I agree that Battlefield has a terrible campaign and if it's going to be that bad, might as well focus on multiplayer. But maybe one reason it's known pretty much as exclusively a multiplayer game is exactly because the campaign isn't close to being up to scratch rather than that being the natural way of things.For MP games I don't care. BF4 has a horrible story, yet I love the games MP. I don't care about story when all I'm trying to do is beat the other team. It's a waste of time to try and weave story into a multiplayer title. Just pit two teams against one another and may the best team win. No other reason needed.
Ori looks cool, I've always enjoyed that type of style. That and the other indie title from the Limbo developer looked very cool.
Well, yeah obviously, but as far as what type of game it actually is, no one really knows. We only not what it isn't.
What do you think it's referring to.