The Dark Knight Rises 6 Minutes of TDKR footage attached to Mission Impossible 4! - - - - Part 13

Yeah, at first I thought people were overreacting but when I went to see it for myself I couldn't understand most of what Bane was saying. In trailer #2 though I could hear him just fine even though I read articles that said the opposite.
 
Yeah, at first I thought people were overreacting but when I went to see it for myself I couldn't understand most of what Bane was saying. In trailer #2 though I could hear him just fine even though I read articles that said the opposite.

Yeah, it seems to come down to a better mix.
 
Last edited:
It's also possible that with extended audio channels/speakers in an IMAX audio setup, the temp mix could have come out differently when 'upconverted' for that as opposed to a regular 5.1 or even stereo temp session to get this scene out there. If a regular theater has a 5.1 matrix, and an IMAX has something like a 13.x...a mix can be done specifically for the IMAX system instead of just letting it re-assign the 5.1 channels throughout. What can happen in some instances is that ambient noises or effects could get doubled into some speakers while the dialogue stays front center in lesser speakers...and you can get (surprise) something that sounds too noisy to hear dialogue. i.e. the surround/FX channels/sounds might have to be mixed 'softer' for IMAX because there's more speakers/channels to play them. So it could've come down to a rather quick temp mix that was fine for stereo and regular theater surround systems, but then didn't sound as good when 'translated' into IMAX systems....so they went back and did a quick remix optimized for IMAX sound systems.

While this is a nice thought, IMAX sound system is not 13.1. Its a 6.1 system.
 
While this is a nice thought, IMAX sound system is not 13.1. Its a 6.1 system.

There are some larger ones out there, no? If not, then yeah, it probably just came down to a lesser initial temp mix.
 
Last edited:
Years back, we had an underwater piece that was playing in one of the older museum IMAX's in I think LA or maybe Florida....but this type of thing came up with an LT/RT mix, and it had to be remixed and delayed the release by about a week. I guess they've all standardized on 6.1, though.
 
lmao, he said a long time ago he was going to change it after hearing the feedback.

I mean what do these people do when they buy coffee.

"This coffee could use some cream." "Oh, thanks for your feedback, here is some cream." "BOOOYAH! IN YOUR FACE!"
 
lmao, he said a long time ago he was going to change it after hearing the feedback.

I mean what do these people do when they buy coffee.

"This coffee could use some cream." "Oh, thanks for your feedback, here is some cream." "BOOOYAH! IN YOUR FACE!"

My guess is that if anything they get a better cup of coffee, rather than, say, a cup of warm cider. :O
 
I have to admit "The sound of the plane was indeed to loud!" but i'm glad they didnt change bane's voice,because thats perfect.


The sound of the plane was indeed quite loud and that didn't help hearing Banes's voice at all.

Glad WB's and Nolan agreed to just remix the sound instead of pissing Nolan off and trying to have him re record all of Banes dialogue if it wasn't necessary.
 
The only question I have is how much of the distortion applied to Bane's voice (like they did to Scarecrow in Batman Begins) was on-set and how much of it was added in post? If it was all post it could be tweaked without re-recording anything if they needed to.
 
I have a question about the prologue that I don't think has been covered...

What the hell are Bane and his men doing with the corpse they drop into the plane? Are they trying to give it a transfusion of blood from the kidnapped scientist, so it appears as if he died in the plane crash? Is the corpse somehow re-animated by the scientist's blood? Also, is the corpse the same man who suddenly appears on the plane and agrees to stay behind? Am I the only one who thought this made no sense and was totally lost? Maybe I'm missing something...

Help.
 
It's been covered. They were putting Pavel's blood in the corpse to make the CIA think that Pavel died in the crash.
 
The only question I have is how much of the distortion applied to Bane's voice (like they did to Scarecrow in Batman Begins) was on-set and how much of it was added in post? If it was all post it could be tweaked without re-recording anything if they needed to.

It's all post. But if they, say, wanted a slightly different accent for Bane for example...Hardy'd have to redub all his lines again. so it'd be even more involved. Likewise they probably enhanced Bale's gravelyness (sp?) in audi post, but he most likely did still perform them raw with a rough delivery, and not his more normal 'Brice' delivery/tone. So if someone were to want Batman's voice deep but not rough, like maybe more like Conroy's, they'd have to be re-record it raw without as much gruffness.
 
Last edited:
That's what I figured... but that makes literally no sense at all.

The body would be burned beyond recognition once the fuselage hit the ground. In these sorts of cases, the best way to identify a corpse is by comparing dental impressions. Just seems like a ludicrously over the top way of dealing with a problem that could probably be solved in a much easier way.
 
I was thinking whateva bane is suffering from the body bag guy died from so they pumped the infected blood into the dr so he finds a cure just like joker and bats in arkham city
 
I was thinking whateva bane is suffering from the body bag guy died from so they pumped the infected blood into the dr so he finds a cure just like joker and bats in arkham city

I don't think that's it, but it certainly makes considerably more sense than the other explanation. Even if that were the case, the question would be, why would Bane need to do that right THEN?
 
That's what I figured... but that makes literally no sense at all.

The body would be burned beyond recognition once the fuselage hit the ground. In these sorts of cases, the best way to identify a corpse is by comparing dental impressions. Just seems like a ludicrously over the top way of dealing with a problem that could probably be solved in a much easier way.

Actually not true, if you search a lot of plane crashes some do use DNA from blood, not all explode or make it where the blood is destroyed in the fire. Sometimes they use hair or saliva, but it seems blood is the most typical way they do it, or find relatives close by and compare their blood to the others blood. Dental does not always survive, it would be as likely as being able to find blood samples in the plane, again depending how it crashed and how bad. Most fuel in planes if I'm not mistaken and this part I'm gunning from the hip, is in the wings, or back of the plane. While the back of the plane and wings are torn off before the fall.

So its not an impossible scenario.
 
That's what I figured... but that makes literally no sense at all.

The body would be burned beyond recognition once the fuselage hit the ground. In these sorts of cases, the best way to identify a corpse is by comparing dental impressions. Just seems like a ludicrously over the top way of dealing with a problem that could probably be solved in a much easier way.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_of_disbelief
 
Have Greg Berlanti as one of the screenwriters. Throw in Guggenheim in there as well. :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"