AnimeJune said:
Did he write it? No. In my opinion, he went too cerebral with the whole depiction of the Hulk character. I mean - HULK POODLES? You could be a 9-time Academy Award winning director, and you still wouldn't be able to make that idea look good.
Hey
Junie. Missed ya yesterday.
Okay, so Hulk Poodles are totally goofy. No arguments there - hence my custom title.
But I actually thought Hulk was a very good movie. It dealt with some very meaty issues, and handled the character very respectfully. It was based more on the Peter David Hulk, but with Stan Lee flavor, none of which I'm likely to complain about.
Plus one of my best friends was a fan of Hulk when Peter David was writing it, and the reason was because my friend IS the Peter David Bruce Banner... the essentially decent, shy guy with very serious father issues and a horribly destructive temper. Basically I'm friends with Bruce Banner, and have been for 17 years.
Also, I very strongly suspect that one of my ex's would totally Hulk out if she was hit with gamma radiation. She was exactly like Bana's Bruce... quiet, uncomfortable with intimacy, couldn't share her feelings with anybody. There was a quiet anger in her that she never acknowledged. She wasn't that way when I met her, but one summer she was away for a couple of weeks and when she came back she wasn't the same anymore. I always wondered what happened to her. I had my suspicions, of course, but I'll never know.
But, anyway... yeah... Hulk? That's a pretty deep movie, if you ask me.
I think Marvel's mistake was the way they marketed it. They amped it up as some big superhero adventure in the style of Spider-Man... and it totally wasn't, nor should it have been, but in advertising it that way they set their audience up for a major let-down.
Oh, and Hulk's bouncing is lifted from the old comic books, I believe.
