Does he even get those?Snyder doesn't get Batman, let alone most of the other DC characters not named Watchmen.
The no-kill code has been part of the character since 1940. It is a big part of the character. It is one of the most important aspects of the character and much more than something to keep popular villains around.
![]()
There is little to back up him being a better character when killing, when there are far more great stories with him not killing.
I think he has tried to help some villains before, but it didn't work out, but there is no reason he should be expected to kill them if he does not want to. Regarding Gotham being better without him, I am not sure. It has been mentioned that villains have been created as a response to him, but I cannot remember ATM if they ever looked at whether Gotham would be better of without him in depth. If such a story was ever done, I highly doubt that they would make it clear that Batman has caused more damage than he has done good.
The no-kill code has been part of the character since 1940. It is a big part of the character. It is one of the most important aspects of the character and much more than something to keep popular villains around.
![]()
There is little to back up him being a better character when killing, when there are far more great stories with him not killing.
I think he has tried to help some villains before, but it didn't work out, but there is no reason he should be expected to kill them if he does not want to. Regarding Gotham being better without him, I am not sure. It has been mentioned that villains have been created as a response to him, but I cannot remember ATM if they ever looked at whether Gotham would be better of without him in depth. If such a story was ever done, I highly doubt that they would make it clear that Batman has caused more damage than he has done good.
Snyder doesn't get Batman, let alone most of the other DC characters not named Watchmen.
Batman shouldn't kill, unless he has no choice to. That is the best Batman, and generally the one who features in the best stories.
The no-kill code has been part of the character since 1940. It is a big part of the character. It is one of the most important aspects of the character and much more than something to keep popular villains around.
![]()
There is little to back up him being a better character when killing, when there are far more great stories with him not killing.
I think he has tried to help some villains before, but it didn't work out, but there is no reason he should be expected to kill them if he does not want to.

This, I agree with.I've always felt that his "no kill" morality actually helps the stories where he has to use lethal force.
Thus, I've never had a problem with him taking criminals out when he's severely outnumbered. He has to act in the same way a soldier would act in that situation. The only area in BvS where he came in conflict with his comic book morality was when he was ready to kill Superman on supposition alone.
Just re watched BvS after seeing it originally in movie theater and I was bothered how terrible the fight choreography was in the dream sequence where Batman was fighting those soldiers in black. I mean he looked god awfully slow. Enemies actually stood around for a few minutes and got closer to let Batman beat on them a bit.Compare that fight scene to the boat fight scene in winter soldier and its not even close in quality.
Just re watched BvS after seeing it originally in movie theater and I was bothered how terrible the fight choreography was in the dream sequence where Batman was fighting those soldiers in black. I mean he looked god awfully slow. Enemies actually stood around for a few minutes and got closer to let Batman beat on them a bit.Compare that fight scene to the boat fight scene in winter soldier and its not even close in quality.
All that did was heighten the dreamlike feeling of the sequence. I thought it was a clever choice actually.
All that did was heighten the dreamlike feeling of the sequence. I thought it was a clever choice actually.
Yeah, I liked that as well. I mean, it's far better than the terribly choreographed The Dark Knight Trilogy, as much as I love those films. That one shot scene was pretty badass, especially when things get dialed up a notch when the parademons start showing up. By the end of it all, it becomes the definition of epic.
Did you see the soldiers put batman in their gun sights only to stand back up move about 3 feet closer to batman and settle back into a shooting position and stay there until batman could get around to clubbing them incredibly slowly. that was pathetic, looked like a movie fight scene made by a SyFy channel
Would you guys mind checking out my electric guitar cover of Beautiful Lie? Thanks!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqHpN-ZzC_c
I've always felt that his "no kill" morality actually helps the stories where he has to use lethal force. We know he loathes it and tries to take any other possible route. However, when he faces a threat beyond his abilities/weaponry to simply disable, he'll take the necessary action. Those rare stories have extra weight because we know Bruce is operating against his natural impulses.
Thus, I've never had a problem with him taking criminals out when he's severely outnumbered. He has to act in the same way a soldier would act in that situation. The only area in BvS where he came in conflict with his comic book morality was when he was ready to kill Superman on supposition alone. That could have been handled differently.
That was fantastic man! Did you get the tabs for that on the Internet, or figure it out by ear? Just curious, I wouldn't mind learning that oneb