DarthSkywalker
🦉Your Most Aggro Pal (he/him)
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2004
- Messages
- 132,622
- Reaction score
- 80,063
- Points
- 203
I agree Cuaron make by far the most cinematic film, with great flavor. I love how he integrates magic, and he established the general look of the films from there on out. But there is little in the term of unnecessary dialogue or scenes in the first two films. Cuaron had the benefit of not having to establish a world. He also failed at making year 3, feel like a year. Columbus' films nail that, while keeping things interesting.I'll admit that POA the film leaves a lot of info out from the books (ironic as its the best one), but I feel that Cuaron was the first director to make a HP film (as opposed to Columbus's HP book in visual form). The first 2 films had ok pacing, but there is SO Much unnecessary dialogue / bits that slow them down.
What they have is some underwhelming acting from the kids in some scenes, a fewless then stellar effects, and bland cinematography at times.
PoA is the "truest" film, but OotP is a strong second. But both would benefit from another 20mins or so. Not simply for back story or exposition, though it is necessary, but in terms of character work. How can anyone really care about the death of Sirius? I still hope that one day we will see the original cut of OotP.OOTP did have a lot of background info taken out, true. But out all the HP films I've seen with friends who are not big fans, it's the only one they clearly understand - its the only 'true' film.
So while they are the best of the Potter films, they don't measure up well to the best film has to offer.