BvS Batman-Superman Movie in 2015

Eh, the logo is the last thing I'm going to fret about.
 
You know fanboys though, use the wrong logo and its RUINED FOREVER.

(Not saying the particular people in this thread saying they don't like the logo are like that, just making generalizations of nitpicky fanboys as a whole)
 
CesRWz6.png


The new logo without the S

Head could be a little taller. Otherwise, I can't complain.
 
I actually like it. Takes some getting used to, but it's very different from any other live action Bat logo, as this Batman should be.
 
I also like it; Dark Knight Returns is awesome. Even though a movie partially based off of it was just made, not all parts were used obviously. The pieces that weren't used can be used in this.
 
CesRWz6.png


The new logo without the S

i like this symbol, i was hoping for the new 52 BATMAN logo and suit.
but maybe this is the bat symbol on his superman battle armor, maybe... coz that would be awesome!
 
I also like it; Dark Knight Returns is awesome. Even though a movie partially based off of it was just made, not all parts were used obviously. The pieces that weren't used can be used in this.

This movie's not not going to be an adaptation of The Dark Knight Returns;it's merely using that story arc for inspiration, just as Nolan's trilogy used Batman: Year One, The Long Halloween, and a number of other Batman story arcs for inspiration.
 
Are you daft? Those were sequels in the same series.

so what? they were still just 3 movies one after another, no one said Bale HAD to come back for TDK or TDKR but obviously that's what everyone and perhaps a contract wanted.

like the old movies where bruce wayne was replaced twice but it was the same story or this series where they changed rachel.
 
so what? they were still just 3 movies one after another, no one said Bale HAD to come back for TDK or TDKR but obviously that's what everyone and perhaps a contract wanted.

like the old movies where bruce wayne was replaced twice but it was the same story or this series where they changed rachel.

:doh::doh::doh::doh::doh:I'm not even going to waste my time with you.:doh::doh::doh::doh::doh:
 
so what? they were still just 3 movies one after another, no one said Bale HAD to come back for TDK or TDKR but obviously that's what everyone and perhaps a contract wanted.

like the old movies where bruce wayne was replaced twice but it was the same story or this series where they changed rachel.

Just because circumstances forced certain roles to be recast doesn't mean it should be a pattern to be consciously followed.
 
I think the logo is too fat. But I do like Doo Bee's idea of it being just on Batman's Superman battle suit (probably lined with Kryptonite).
 
^ As far as I know, Kryptonite doesn't exist in the universe they've created for Man of Steel and this World's Finest movie.
 
Problem there is Kryptonite doesn't exist in the MOS universe, yet. :hmm
 
That Logo is a bit different from the Frank Miller's Dark Knight Returns logo.

It also looks better. (Though it took me some time to accept it.)
 
I'd actually love to see Bruce Wayne and Lex Luthor working together to obtain/harness kryptonite.
 
So who are the casting choices for Batman ?

My choices (in no particular order)

Matthew Bomer.

Jake Gyllenhaal

James Marsden

Luke Evans.
 
This movie's not not going to be an adaptation of The Dark Knight Returns;it's merely using that story arc for inspiration, just as Nolan's trilogy used Batman: Year One, The Long Halloween, and a number of other Batman story arcs for inspiration.

I know it's not an adaptation, but the logo being what it is and the line they read at comic con implies that parts of it would be used. Which is what I said may be happening.

Specifically, I'm imagining the Superman/Batman fight at the end.
 
^ As far as I know, Kryptonite doesn't exist in the universe they've created for Man of Steel and this World's Finest movie.

Problem there is Kryptonite doesn't exist in the MOS universe, yet. :hmm

i thought the same thing once i had the idea of a Superman Battle Armor, but it doesn't have to be the literal "off the page" take of TDKR
i was thinking Bruce sees superman, thinks to himself maybe i gotta up my armor for this guy, so Batman has this bulky armor which he believes could help pound superman around but really superman strips him of his suit.
this could remind bruce he is just a man, talk it out, have a friendly handshake, oh look we can work together to stop lexcorp... blah blah haha
 
^ Bruce and Clark shouldn't be at odds unless there's a reason for them to be, which is why I think you need an external catalyst, and the simplest way to provide that catalyst is through the use of a villain. I personally think that villain should be someone from Batman's rogues gallery, such as Joker, Scarecrow, Mad Hatter, or The Riddler, as they can also provide the catalyst for Bruce and Clark realizing they're on the same side and working together after initially being at odds.
 
I like the new Bat symbol,Old school looking
 
Absolutely, we do not need to see Batman's origin explored again. Everybody knows it and its been less than 10 years since Begins. You can easily reference it in dialogue or if you must touch on his origin show some really quick flashbacks (ala the type of thing that was shown about his origin in Batman Forever) in a later solo film.

IF they do a new origin for this new character then I hope it's just a flashback scene in this movie like the intro for The Incredible Hulk film
 
^ Bruce and Clark shouldn't be at odds unless there's a reason for them to be, which is why I think you need an external catalyst, and the simplest way to provide that catalyst is through the use of a villain. I personally think that villain should be someone from Batman's rogues gallery, such as Joker, Scarecrow, Mad Hatter, or The Riddler, as they can also provide the catalyst for Bruce and Clark realizing they're on the same side and working together after initially being at odds.

in the comics there was a distrust that Batman has with Kal-el
Bruce can't believe or trust that someone with so much power, so much ability can perfect and all good. Batman in the comics and most recently shown in the DC animated movies, ect. he has a fail safe to stop all member of the league in case they go rouge or "evil".
Batman is from Gotham when no one is all "good", no one. not even himself. so for him to see this Alien come to earth and swear he is all good, in this universe I'm sure Bruce would have seen the news, a being with great abilites bringing such threats to the earth, the devastation that metropolis went though. Batman in this universe would not trust Superman at all.
so by "fighting" the man of steel in some kind of make shift armor, he can test the views of Superman, will superman spare Batman or kill him, All Kal-el would have to do is not kill Bruce and they will have an understanding. Bruce will see he is something of hope, truth and justice.
they are the same qualities Batman holds, only one is will to break bones, beat down, get their hands dirty.
it's batman/superman 101 really.
and i think that could be a great starting point.

EDIT AFTER THOUGHT: i also think having it be the two character figure it out is more character based and character driven for the story. having a villain be a catalyst seems too showy and too "marvel" (not hating on marvel i just think the two should aim for different ways about their franchises)
and i know we have Snyder here making this, he seems to be showy and less into complete character driven pieces/scenes but i think, in my opinion, having Batman and Kal-el sort one another out would not only benefit well for a critics standpoint but the audience will be able to have a clear sight into who these heroes are, what they stand for, and what they aim to achieve.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"