parkerpete
Sidekick
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2003
- Messages
- 1,306
- Reaction score
- 62
- Points
- 33
But this was batman/superman/ww together for the first time. That accounted for a lot. That is why I went OW. If they had done MoS2 (which this almost was since you could pretty much remove batman and not change much in the movie) then it would have done much worse OW and I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have gone OW and waited to see if it was better then the first MoS.
Have to agree with this. MoS made a profit but underperformed and a lot of fans groused about the characterization of Superman. So much so that WB INCORPORATED THOSE COMPLAINTS INTO A PLOT POINT FOR BVS, AND added Batman for the sequel. That tells you how nervous they were about winning over the general audience.
A lot of people who were not big fans of MoS came back for Batman and the perception that WB/Snyder recognized the criticisms of the first movie, and were addressing them specifically to improve upon them.
Instead, they doubled down on the problematic tone/characterizations, and delivered a movie that is looked upon by many as an even bigger critical failure than MoS. They burned off all their goodwill. Sure, I may be wrong in my perceptions, and the General Audience might be forgiving enough to give JL another huge opening weekend.
But I would put up my own money to bet against it, if they keep Snyder.
Last edited: