Ronny Shade
back for a limited time
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2004
- Messages
- 18,767
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Ya Rly.
Ronny Shade said:I understand it, I think it strengthens my side of the argument. Burton's Batman had much less atmosphere and wa much less convincing that of Nolan/Bale. I wouldve thought it better if he HAD had make up on when he took off the mask, since it was so obviously makeup the whole time.

OK...Super_Ludacris said:Yeah I think you right cause Ive never seen a "TRIPOD" image logo in a Batman movie
BatScot said:OK...![]()
Actually, scratch that. Best thing about that franchise.Super_Ludacris said:With the classic Walken 'twang too

Well I'll be damned, that's the first valid point you've brought up all day, but be sure to note it well because you're not likely to get that lucky again, and had you written a proper sentence...Super_Ludacris said:In the first post you tried to upload the image and it didnt show up.
... I might have realized what you were on about sooner.Super_Ludacris said:Step your uploading and link skills up willy!
MoPlaYa43 said:Happy 420 to everyone at the Hype!!![]()
Hey look, it can tell time... will wonders never cease.Super_Ludacris said:...He says 30 minutes later
Saint said:I can't continue with this thread. SL uses such torturedm demented logic that it gives me a headache just reading it.
BatScot said:Hey look, it can tell time... will wonders never cease.

No, I'm not upset. If I was upset I'd be calling you a variety of crude names. The only thing I am, is tired of your ridiculous notion that Batman does not wear lenses, despite the fact that the comics make it perfectly clear that he does. You seem to think you're a higher authority than the books themselves, which is rather irritating.Super_Ludacris said:Saint your just getting upset because I'm disagreeing with your view and I've said at the core of my argument the white lense idea is forced and others have co-signed it. It's not as ridiculous as you think cause others have said the same. You getting upset at individuals doesnt help your argument.
Saint said:No, I'm not upset. If I was upset I'd be calling you a variety of crude names. The only thing I am, is tired of your ridiculous notion that Batman does not wear lenses, despite the fact that the comics make it perfectly clear that he does. You seem to think you're a higher authority than the books themselves, which is rather irritating.
I don't care if you think it's "forced," or whatever other irrelevant bulls*it you conjure up. It doesn't matter what you think. The only thing that matters it what is said in the comics, and that is--very clearly--that Batman wears lenses. You are wrong. Stop stumbling around like a fool defending your crumbling position.
Jesus, now I'm upset. Follow your own advice and READ, you idiot. I have said no less than twice that I am not arguing against or on the behalf of lenses on film--I don't care about that, nor do I care about your reasons for opposing them. I only care about your moronic inability to accept that Batman wears goddamn lenses in the comics.Super_Ludacris said:Wow....Saint you really dropped the ball there homie. Because I gave reasons why even if the lenses were in the comics, why it still wouldnt work on film.Again I'm saying politley: Read people's post before you start accusing people. I said "ok if the lenses are in the comics, here's why I still think it doesnt work"
What the hell? That sentence doesn't make any bloody sense. It's not a matter of caring, it's a matter of your thoughts bein IRRELEVANT, because lenses in the comics are FACT. You keep saying you "think" they're forced and "feel" they don't work, and it's your "opinion" that he doesn't wear them. Get this through your goddamn skull: IT IS NOT A MATTER OF OPINION, IT IS A MATTER OF FACT. IT IS FACT THAT BATMAN WEARS LENSES IN THE COMICS.And you can pretend to not care what I think but then you why would not dismiss my belief and reasons why I disagree?
Dear God, I'll say this one more time: I have NEVER argued in favour of movies lenses, so quit disagreeing with an argument I never made! My ONLY concern is your foolish, illogical, and moronic insistance contrary to hard evidence that Batman doesn't wear lenses in the comics.You know there's other people like Ronny Shade, Two-Face, Brian and Guybrush gave reason why we dont want lenses, so it aint a crumbling position at all. And I explained that calmy why lenses are not needed in the movie and that's why we cross into the comic argument. Surely you would have to agree the white lense look is used on characters who dont have lenses (like the Turltes for instance) so that's why I said early "it's debatable". What's unreasonable and BS about that? Nothing, except you getting bothered. It's pointless dude.
Saint said:Jesus, now I'm upset. Follow your own advice and READ, you idiot. I have said no less than twice that I am not arguing against or on the behalf of lenses on film--I don't care about that, nor do I care about your reasons for opposing them. I only care about your moronic inability to accept that Batman wears goddamn lenses in the comics..

Saint said:What the hell? That sentence doesn't make any bloody sense. It's not a matter of caring, it's a matter of your thoughts bein IRRELEVANT, because lenses in the comics are FACT. You keep saying you "think" they're forced and "feel" they don't work, and it's your "opinion" that he doesn't wear them. Get this through your goddamn skull: IT IS NOT A MATTER OF OPINION, IT IS A MATTER OF FACT. IT IS FACT THAT BATMAN WEARS LENSES IN THE COMICS.

Saint said:Dear God, I'll say this one more time: I have NEVER argued in favour of movies lenses, so quit disagreeing with an argument I never made! My ONLY concern is your foolish, illogical, and moronic insistance contrary to hard evidence that Batman doesn't wear lenses in the comics.
. Remember the main point is: White eyes in the movies? You cant hold a grudge over one thing, which a lot of other people may assume too. 
My debate game