third3ye
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 924
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
*cough* Something to remember is, when estimating break even points? Be careful not to accidentally double stack. When studios talk about only get X percent overseas, part of that reduced percentage is because of local subsidiaries spending money on. . . overseas distribution and marketing. So, that "40% overseas" revenue figure is already accounting for overseas marketing. You don't also add X million to the expenses column.
Really, its best to just ignore marketing costs, unless there's some reason to believe they are unusually high ( TASM 2 ). Half of them are funny money transfers between corporate divisions, or contract barter between companies with no cash changing hands; the other half are typically balanced out by tax breaks and product placement.
All good points. Not every overseas distributor covers P&A though and it varies depending on the agreements negotiated with all those distributors. Also I'm not sure such an agreement should affect theater rental %s as that's worked out between the distributor and the theater chain, but overseas distributors are allowed to recover P&A costs they've spent prior to sending money to Disney so there is some of that going on in lowering Disney's net take from IBO. Given that and the fact that Disney owns distribution in some international territories, it's probably safe to assume that Disney's P&A spend isn't 100% domestic only. And regarding marketing costs by film, every studio does it on their books. Granted there is an allocation method behind it as a good chunk of these costs are shared overhead within the studio, but at the end of the day a film's P&L whether for internal studio accounting or participation accounting does get assigned a marketing budget. Clearly we can get analysis paralysis here, I just used some rough industry estimates to guesstimate a break-even, but lots of good points brought up.