Darepool
Sidekick
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2016
- Messages
- 2,069
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
By your logic a downward trend for Rogue One's opening indicates we're getting Star Wars fatigue, but the fact that Age of Ultron and Civil War both made less than Avengers 1 (with CW making less than AOU despite Spider-Man and better reviews) doesn't show superhero fatigue?
Historically, most franchises tend to have diminishing returns with sequels. That's kinda why for a long time sequels in general had a reputation for not being as good or successful as the originals in most cases.
Civil War isn't an Avengers film really, it wasn't marketed as one. The guy who reports on the Chinese box office for pro.boxoffice made reference to the impact that distinction can make in terms of box office.
Secondly, the Russo's are different directors then Whedon and not enough of this fact has been emphasized imo. They are great technically and brilliant with the action, but they don't do crowd pleasers like Whedon can in terms of mixing all the elements to reach and satisfy the widest audience possible. He just has that knack.
Last but not least, do you expect the next (actual) Avengers film to make less then CW and prove the fatigue narrative?