Days of Future Past 'Days Of Future Past' BOX-OFFICE worldwide prediction - Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
302 million worldwide is a great, great number. And considering the CinemaScore from audiences, we might see an X-Men film with some legs. Might.

Either way, I think the franchise we'll be okay.

Prediction for final gross worldwide? 690 million worldwide. A part of me wants to say 800 million but I'm just lowballing it right now. We'll know more after this upcoming weekend.
 
If this article isn't completely biased, I don't know what is. :whatever:

Sorry but when the Winter Soldier has an ENTIRE month to itself, I don't think you can really make fair comparisons. But, whatever.
 
Maybe if they would have left Anna Paquin in the movie and kept the original script more people would have come. Think about it. All the people that watch True Bloodwho have never seen X-Men might have showed up. I mean I know not everybody is a rogue fan but it makes no sense to bring back an original character and hype her up just to cut her like that. To me that's a dumb move on their part. Seeing as she was the main focus in the original movie. Sorry for the rant but it kills me to see that.
 
Maybe if they would have left Anna Paquin in the movie and kept the original script more people would have come. Think about it. All the people that watch True Bloodwho have never seen X-Men might have showed up. I mean I know not everybody is a rogue fan but it makes no sense to bring back an original character and hype her up just to cut her like that. To me that's a dumb move on their part. Seeing as she was the main focus in the original movie. Sorry for the rant but it kills me to see that.

Possibly. Also, that Rogue rescue would have added another bit of action in the middle of the movie, where it went a bit talky. But it might also have made it a bit convoluted, I don't know without seeing it.
 
Not really Darth. Before X3 even came out, the studio and producers were planning spin-offs and prequels. That's because the movies were becoming expensive and also difficult to get all the cast together. I'm sure the production problems of X3 didn't help - not being able to get a deal with Singer, Singer then leaving, Vaughn then leaving, etc. The franchise was becoming trickier to manage, so they wanted to go smaller and less expensive.

Of course, this was all before Marvel Studios began releasing movies. Fox and Sony were the comic book movie kings at this time. And, sadly, studio bosses didn't really see the huge long-term value of the 50 years of X-Men comics that Fox had rights to. They just wanted to wrap X-Men up in three films with a nice, neat trilogy then explore some spin-offs. It turned out to be a very unwise way of thinking.

It's pretty staggering that a studio would have film rights to 50 years of comics (X-Men and F4 both appeared in the early 60s) and not exploit that to full potential by mapping out a franchise far into the future. How many other times does a studio have half a century of classic stories in its grasp?! Studios are always looking for franchises - and trying to make films into franchises - and yet in this case they didn't see what they had right in front of them. I guess 50 years of comics are not as easy to comprehend as one series of books (like Potter, Twilight, Hunger Games, LoTR).

However, they are now waking up to the idea. Thank God.
While I'd agree some of that is true, it was down to the cost in the end, the same way all these series end outside of TDKT. The films were going to continually cost more and more, and they were not making the kind of money that could sustain that.

90 million is nothing to sneeze at but I thught it would go over 100 million because they finally put the sentinels in the movie and with the cast alone never in my wildest dreams would I ever think Iron Man would be
more popular than the x-men

Movie was brilliant hopefully with the great word of mouth it does great
business next weekend
Considering the release date, you can sneeze at it if you choose. It isn't a fantastic number, but I'd say it is good, especially considering the X-Men franchise isn't in top form in terms of selling tickets right now.

The more encouraging number is the OS take, but again it isn't nearly as fruitful as the domestic box office.

Considering that DoFP was preceded by two smaller movies (The Wolverine and First Class), it has done very well.

They haven't yet built the momentum, brand awareness and interconnectivity that Marvel Studios has done.

But they are getting there. The end of The Wolverine led towards DoFP, and the post-credits sequence of DoFP led towards X-Men Apocalypse. What DoFP could have done is actually announced 'X-Men Apocalypse coming May 27, 2016' on a title screen at the end of the movie. They should be more confident with these things, more confident in their product and their franchise. It's the only way to get into 'pop culture.'
I am going to have to see Apocalypse come out on that day before I believe it. With the Cap 3 and BvS dance, and the quick two year turn around, chances are we won't see Apocalypse until 2017.

Maybe if they would have left Anna Paquin in the movie and kept the original script more people would have come. Think about it. All the people that watch True Bloodwho have never seen X-Men might have showed up. I mean I know not everybody is a rogue fan but it makes no sense to bring back an original character and hype her up just to cut her like that. To me that's a dumb move on their part. Seeing as she was the main focus in the original movie. Sorry for the rant but it kills me to see that.
The general public had little to no knowledge of this, and I doubt many cared. The biggest impact of fans was for Katniss.
 
You want legs, then the film makers are going to have to start gearing these movies with young women and teen girls as the audience in mind, because most movies with legs, have something for that demographic. It don't take much, just a couple of cute hot guys showing off their chests is all that will be needed. Unfortunately, Wolvie just isn't enough anymore. I'd say they might want to consider sexing up Fassbender and McAvoy a bit more in the next movie to get some extra legs for the franchise.

I disagree, the male characters in Avatar and Titanic weren't sexed up, Avengers had cap America and Thor, but i didn't get the idea of them being sexed up either. With Days of Future Past i think they had enough ingredients to make the female audience more interested, you just need to keep that balance for the franchise to catch up again.
 
I hardly think millions of people are boycotting the film because Rogue isn't in it :doh:
 
If they keep amping up the quality I'm sure the box office will reflect that
and also I wish fox would not show x-3 or Origins leading up to this past
weekend may have turned people off :woot:
 
I didn't say that. I said that maybe they should have left her in because it could have generated new blood to come watch it. Anna has alot of fans from true blood now. You have to admit though that she was the main focus in the beginning.
 
If they keep amping up the quality I'm sure the box office will reflect that
and also I wish fox would not show x-3 or Origins leading up to this past
weekend may have turned people off :woot:
I do wonder if X-Men, at least this incarnation, has a ceiling that we have met, at least domestically. Overseas expansion is helping quite a lot.
 
Sorry but when the Winter Soldier has an ENTIRE month to itself, I don't think you can really make fair comparisons. But, whatever.
I was saying that the article was biased in favour of Capt. America and against DOFP. :huh:
 
Marvel has their movies planned out until 2028. It makes sense that FOX would have had the original X-Men trilogy planned and then some once they realized it was going to be a success. The "lack" of success for X3 was irrelevant.
 
Marvel has their movies planned out until 2028. It makes sense that FOX would have had the original X-Men trilogy planned and then some once they realized it was going to be a success. The "lack" of success for X3 was irrelevant.

When Bryan SInger was involved, their ideas for the 3rd film were quite different, and they had plans for the 4th film to be the end of that storyline, instead of making it just a Trilogy.
 
I think after IM3 hit a billion ...... there might be a perception that every other movie has to hit it too.

The actual fact..... IM3 had 6 movies before it with the ultimate one being The avengers. MCU built up the universe with a blue-print way ahead....and its now paying off for their movies.


DOFP is coming after TLS, XOW & First class. The previous 2 movies were ... :doh:. First Class was quite good. And DOFP is gonna gross almost twice that movie did. In fact by this weekend, it would have outgrossed the domestic total of that movie.

I really do think that X-Men: Apocalypse is gonna gross loads of money. McAvoy, Fassbender, Lawrence are gonna be even more popular. Hugh Jackman has his fair share of fans. The new gambit is gonna bring in his fair share of chick fans too :woot:


One more point, lets wait for this summer to be over 1st before grading the boxoffice performance of the movies. Its not a given that the other movies are gonna gross $300M or $400M.
 
I didn't say that. I said that maybe they should have left her in because it could have generated new blood to come watch it. Anna has alot of fans from true blood now. You have to admit though that she was the main focus in the beginning.

I agree that having a more prominent Rogue role in the movie would have helped convince general audiences that this movie was something special... but I would say that for any of the OT. They really weren't promoted enough in my opinion. Even though Storm had such a small role, it was a mistake to not make it super obvious that she was in this movie. Like the actors or not, they let you know that this movie is a return to greatness.

However, can we please stop this assumption that popular tv actors bring in movie audiences?? If that were true it wouldn't be such a struggle for tv actors to make it in movies. The percentage of success is SOOOO low for that transition. And honestly, I think most True Blood fans (the few that are left) watch it in spite of Anna being on it.
 
And honestly, I think most True Blood fans (the few that are left) watch it in spite of Anna being on it.

I would agree with this - I like Sookie and Anna's portrayal but I could name ten other characters/actors off the top of my head that probably draw more people into that show than her.

I don't think having Rogue more prominent in the movie was really going to change audience attitude or willingness to see the movie.
 
I agree that having a more prominent Rogue role in the movie would have helped convince general audiences that this movie was something special... but I would say that for any of the OT. They really weren't promoted enough in my opinion. Even though Storm had such a small role, it was a mistake to not make it super obvious that she was in this movie. Like the actors or not, they let you know that this movie is a return to greatness.

This!

Yes, everyone knew they were back but I was so, so, so surprised they didn't make an awesome vanity trailer. I mean, when that image was tweeted of the cast at the start of all this, listing their various award achievements, who didn't expect an incredible:

"JACKMAN

*shot of Wolverine*

LAWRENCE

*shot of Mystique*

MCAVOY
FASSBENDER
BERRY
PAQUIN
PAGE"

and so on and so forth, sort of trailer?

They had the best cast ever assembled for a movie like this and it boggles the mind why they weren't promoting it to hell and back, regardless of how small some roles were.
 
The actual numbers are in for the box office:

Day 1: $35,511,974
Day 2: $29,283,650 (-17.5%)
Day 3: $26,028,036 (-11.1%)
Day 4: $19,752,944 (-24.1%)

Total: $110,576,604

Abit less than the predictions, mostly due to the first day being over-estimated.
 
Its not going to make this much but would 800million dollars be considered a good worldwide gross for the movie.
 
This!

Yes, everyone knew they were back but I was so, so, so surprised they didn't make an awesome vanity trailer. I mean, when that image was tweeted of the cast at the start of all this, listing their various award achievements, who didn't expect an incredible:

"JACKMAN

*shot of Wolverine*

LAWRENCE

*shot of Mystique*

MCAVOY
FASSBENDER
BERRY
PAQUIN
PAGE"

and so on and so forth, sort of trailer?

They had the best cast ever assembled for a movie like this and it boggles the mind why they weren't promoting it to hell and back, regardless of how small some roles were.
I wish they'd always do one name trailer/TV spot for each film. This one would have been crazy.
 
Its not going to make this much but would 800million dollars be considered a good worldwide gross for the movie.

600 million would be breaking even including marketing costs, that would leave them dvd, bluray and digital sells and tv rights to make millions from. Not to mention the enormous product placement that should cover most of the budget.

To be honest, if this movie made $300million worldwide it would still make a big profit because they had so much product placement and tv rights and home video sells
 
Yes. 650+ to 700+ million would be good too tbh.

I think they would consider 650-700 a major success. I think 600 is their bottom line they want to hit but as i said above this movie could make very little in theaters and still turn a profit since product placement covered most the budget
 
And it might be cheap bc of Memorial Day weekend but I think days now has a higher 4 day domestic total than spiderman 2, cap 2 and godzilla
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"