I like itWhat about 'The Goddamn Tony Stark'?
It's a clever idea, but I kind of think that giving even a bare bones description of the opposing teams strategy is too big an advantage, because it lets their opponent basically draft his whole rebuttal in advance.OK, so here's an idea that I had while doing one of my writeups. I think it's a cool idea and everyone else will hate it, but I thought I'd toss it around anyway:
Precog is basically an underpowered ability in the DTL, especially on ubers and to some extent meds. I mean, with a reg like Midnighter, you can kind of just say he knows everything the other guy will do, but up on those ubers and meds, precog tends to be a lot more abstract, or else it's cosmic awareness and makes a character ripe for tubering. Even when it is used effectively, all it does is allow a character to foresee a move that you would have written him as beating anyway.
So what if, to make precog more of useful asset to a team in a real way, owners facing a team with an uber precog were required to give a bare-bones outline of their strategy before their opponent did their writeup?
HAHAHA **** that ****, no WAY would I do that. You could kick my happy ass out of this thing before I go along with that horse****.OK, so here's an idea that I had while doing one of my writeups. I think it's a cool idea and everyone else will hate it, but I thought I'd toss it around anyway:
Precog is basically an underpowered ability in the DTL, especially on ubers and to some extent meds. I mean, with a reg like Midnighter, you can kind of just say he knows everything the other guy will do, but up on those ubers and meds, precog tends to be a lot more abstract, or else it's cosmic awareness and makes a character ripe for tubering. Even when it is used effectively, all it does is allow a character to foresee a move that you would have written him as beating anyway.
So what if, to make precog more of useful asset to a team in a real way, owners facing a team with an uber precog were required to give a bare-bones outline of their strategy before their opponent did their writeup?
You slackers.
![]()
![]()
![]()
I kinda would. People with no vested interest in keeping things nonpartisan would be mighty tempted to vote based on friendships they might have. I'd like to keep votes to just active owners plus XFanTim, because I just trust him. Maybe guys like Harlekin, guys we know played before and dug the game at least for awhile. But only current and former players in good standing.On a different topic, would anyone be against me trying to get some outside voters from the other rpg threads?