STAR WARS is still on top going strong!
NUMBER ONE @ Box Office for third week: Star Wars: The Force Awakens $41,630,000
http://deadline.com/2016/01/the-revenant-star-wars-the-force-awakens-weekend-box-office-1201678383/
So why is it judged differently then those?And I've said this earlier parts of this thread, Titanic visually stunning, but the romance part is as unbelievable as Superheros, Jedi and Transformers.
So why is it judged differently then those?
Because icky love.Cause the suspension of belief can only go so far. LOL
Because icky love.
I hope TFA can beat Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs in the All Time Domestic Inflation Adjusted rank.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm
The idea behind the relationship in Titanic is rather easy. Young love built on the back of one of the most tragic events in history. Of course it left a mark on her, of course he remembers. It isn't that she spent the rest of her life pining, it is that in her old age she was reminded of a beautiful moment in her life. Something that no one would forget.My favorite Pixar movie is about love between robots. That's more believable than a woman pining away for a man she spent 3 days with over 70 years later after experiencing a full and eventful love.
It has nothing to do with "icky love." Maybe it's because something like that can be more identifiable for most people. If you've been in a brief relationship, and even if they were tragically taken away, I'm sure being in even a 10 year relationship would make you get over it in a sense.
Someone mentioned stripping down a movie to a silly theme, well personally, this one falls short of the others for me.
There are advantages and disadvantages on both sides of the argument.I take Box Office Mojo's inflation list with a grain of salt.
Mainly because it's based on the assumption that the average movie ticket now is $8.61. So that's not accounting at all 3D ticket prices or IMAX.
Pretty much every blockbuster would have probably have had 3D and maybe IMAX releases in addition to regular screenings if they were available at the time but that's not taken into account in inflation.
Reflection on youth is a common thing in old age. Also, what exactly is wrong with pandering to teenage girls?Did it change her life? Yes. But the way it was relayed in the movie, is at her death, that was the moment she wanted to go back to. Over her husband, kids, grandkids, other life achievements? Yeah, didn't work for me and it felt like it pandered to teenage girls.
I am confused by why you think it matters what others think about what she cares about in her last days? It is her life. Considering it was brought back into her life at that time, it makes rather good sense. Also doesn't mean she loves her family any less.Because it's unrealistic?
Be in a relationship. How would you feel if your wife was through a tragic ordeal but instead of thinking of you and the life you spent decades building, in the end she wanted to go back to a man that she spent 3 days with.
Again, I just found that unbelievable.
If it worked for you, that's fine with you. But it didn't work for me, which is why I haven't watched this again since I saw it in the theaters.
I have never seen Titanic placed over Gone with the Wind when adjusted for inflation worldwide, nor would that make sense, as I believe Gone with the Wind made made more overseas then it did domestically. Titanic would have had to double it overseas. Titanic is an amazing #2.
And them bringing it to her doorstep just made it all the more relevant in her mind.I never got the impression Rose spent her life pining for Jack in Titanic. In fact I think the movie makes it clear she went on to live a very full, happy life without him. But that was bound to be the most traumatic and life-changing few days of her life, so of course it would never totally leave her. The life and people she knew on that ship were guaranteed to be etched in her memories forever.
I hope TFA can beat Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs in the All Time Domestic Inflation Adjusted rank.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm
I am confused by why you think it matters what others think about what she cares about in her last days? It is her life. Considering it was brought back into her life at that time, it makes rather good sense. Also doesn't mean she loves her family any less.
That's because box office mojo's adjusted chart only accounts for domestic. But if you look at GWTW's page you'll see that it actually made more overseas than domestic($201.5m vs $189m) so it's just a simple math problem to find the adjusted WW totals for it and Titanic as well and Titanic comes out $300m ahead of GWTW. Now granted, I just lumped all of Titanic's grosses in there rather than separating it's initial gross from the re-release additions(which would have less increases from inflation as they were more recent) but hey, adjusting for inflation in the first place is an inaccurate business so why not I figured.
I am not talking about just Mojo. How do you adjust Titanic so high? It would mean it nearly doubled since its release, when most put it just ahead of Avatar.That's because box office mojo's adjusted chart only accounts for domestic. But if you look at GWTW's page you'll see that it actually made more overseas than domestic($201.5m vs $189m) so it's just a simple math problem to find the adjusted WW totals for it and Titanic as well and Titanic comes out $300m ahead of GWTW. Now granted, I just lumped all of Titanic's grosses in there rather than separating it's initial gross from the re-release additions(which would have less increases from inflation as they were more recent) but hey, adjusting for inflation in the first place is an inaccurate business so why not I figured.
I take Box Office Mojo's inflation list with a grain of salt.
Mainly because it's based on the assumption that the average movie ticket now is $8.61. So that's not accounting at all 3D ticket prices or IMAX.
Pretty much every blockbuster would have probably have had 3D and maybe IMAX releases in addition to regular screenings if they were available at the time but that's not taken into account in inflation.
I still dong get how it could be ahead of gone with the wind because all inflation is say is that based of the amount of tickets it sold back then if it sold the same amount of tickets today it would have made this amount of money and gone with the wind sold more tickets then any another movie ever and that is all inflation is really saying.
# of tickets do enter in, as that is what you hit with the inflation. How else would you calculation inflation? You are comparing ticket for ticket. It isn't an exact science because of premium formats now, but that is an advantage for newer films. They still lag behind Gone with the Wind.I don't think # of ticket sales enters into it. If so I suspect the list of most popular movies would look a bit different than the adjusted chart. It's based on the annual rate of inflation. Not only has the worth of $ decreased over time(which is inflation) but the comparative cost of seeing a movie today is not what it was back in the day. In other words even when accounting for inflation and taking that out of the equation the cost of a ticket back then as a percentage of how much money you made is far less than it is today.