I don't think he killed the girl cop, just slapped her a good one in the face. And the coin was good side up for Gordon, not Batsy.
How could they have covered it up? The SWAT team was closing in so Batman went on the run. He didn't have time to help Gordon move the body. So Gordon moves the body by himself? Where to? The perimeter was surrounded.
I wanted Two-Face to live too, but put aside your passion for the character and look at this from a storytelling perspective. Does it make more sense for THIS story, not thinking about the possibility of a sequel, to have Harvey live or die? I think the answer is obvious.
I was under the impression that Batman was held responsible for Dent's death. Wasn't that the whole point? That he takes the fall for Dent's killings and Dent himself?
I was under the impression that Batman was held responsible for Dent's death. Wasn't that the whole point? That he takes the fall for Dent's killings and Dent himself?
No, all the people Batman took the "credit" for killing can be perceived as vigilante killings. That is they were all "bad" people, and that still fits within the publics' perceived notion of him. That is, having him kill innocent people would not stand up as a cover up story for the public. Here, is exact;y why they cannot have him "kill" Dent as part of the cover up, as they still want Dent to be perceived as good.
I think they left people thinking Dent died in the hospital blast and that Batman killed Dent's victim's for whatever reason
I just want to say that the f/x they used for Two-Face were exceptional. Harvey actually really stole the movie for me. I knew the Joker was gonna be great, but I had no idea Two-Face was gonna be like that. I just wish they would've held off for part 3, Two-Face needs a whole movie to himself....