Excellent points about TV vs film. I wish we could get a Batman series in the "Sherlock" format - three 90 minute episodes per season.
I haven't thought of that. That would be awesome

Excellent points about TV vs film. I wish we could get a Batman series in the "Sherlock" format - three 90 minute episodes per season.
Only i hated every moment of Iron Man 3 when i was watching it. I felt embarrassed even being in the theater.
I don't think superhero films will go away altogether. Both can coexist, but can be different. A lot of the "TV serials" we are getting on the big screen today are only on the big screen because they're too expensive for TV. If anything, I think the future holds more variety in the sense that directors/writers can pick-and-choose the medium that best fits their story/take.
That's absolutely true. Even if I had the power to "fix" TDKR it still wouldn't be a movie I'd like to watch over and over. However I do wish it was a movie that I could watch without getting bored and/or frustrated. The bomb, Alfred's google-fu, etc.
Google flu? Just curious.
That's absolutely true. Even if I had the power to "fix" TDKR it still wouldn't be a movie I'd like to watch over and over. However I do wish it was a movie that I could watch without getting bored and/or frustrated. The bomb, Alfred's google-fu, etc.
I dont see the problem with that. Bruce was busy tending to other matters, plus his head still wasn't screwed on right at the time. Alfred does a quick checkup and tells Bruce the basics.He's referring to Alfred google-ing things about Bane. The way that whole scene plays out, it's as if he looked up information of Bane on Google.
I dont see the problem with that. Bruce was busy tending to other matters, plus his head still wasn't screwed on right at the time. Alfred does a quick checkup and tells Bruce the basics.
He's referring to Alfred google-ing things about Bane. The way that whole scene plays out, it's as if he looked up information of Bane on Google.
I think he's referring to Alfred knowing about Bane's "backstory".
He's referring to Alfred google-ing things about Bane. The way that whole scene plays out, it's as if he looked up information of Bane on Google.
And not just Bane - the League of Shadows and John Daggett'a seedy dealings. If Bane can be linked to the LOS they should be able to link BRUCE as well.
Ah does not bug me. If Bane is supposed to be as big as hinted at in the prologue, even as a myth, I'm sure that stuff (which was only half-accurate) would be online.
I mean, the comics and TAS have Alfred digging all the time. I recall in the first Poison Ivy episode of TAS, it is Alfred "looking up" Pamela Isley (in the pre-internet days) while Batman is driving around that cracks the case. Alfred did all the research.
To me, complaining that it happened here is a nitpick.
And not just Bane - the League of Shadows and John Daggett'a seedy dealings. If Bane can be linked to the LOS they should be able to link BRUCE as well.
Ah does not bug me. If Bane is supposed to be as big as hinted at in the prologue, even as a myth, I'm sure that stuff (which was only half-accurate) would be online.
I mean, the comics and TAS have Alfred digging all the time. I recall in the first Poison Ivy episode of TAS, it is Alfred "looking up" Pamela Isley (in the pre-internet days) while Batman is driving around that cracks the case. Alfred did all the research.
To me, complaining that it happened here is a nitpick.
Narratively, I think it could have easily been 4-6 movies. I will not deny that there feels like at least a step skipped between TDK and TDKR. They even hint at it at times with the Batcave rebuilt and Jim Gordon being a "war hero," from a war we never saw.
But yes, as Nolan is one of the great mainstream filmmakers of his generation, he really shouldn't have to stick around for 15 years doing sequels, especially when I think it is safe to say that his passion level plateaued with TDK. As a fan of his world, I wish the story was a little more complex than the three-act structure. But I agree that I would rather him go out relatively on top, or at least near it, than not be making more original films. The studio has already ensured that we will not miss a beat for another Batman movie in a few years.
I'd agree with everything you just said Shika.
I have a lot of mixed feelings on the issue though, mainly because I'd hate to see films replaced with TV altogether when it comes to telling epic stories. There's something special about being in a darkened room with a crowd of people and witnessing this kind of spectacle on the big screen, with the big sound that's hard to replace at home no matter how good your home theater is. Especially when you bring IMAX into the equation.
Also, I feel like Marvel's cinematic universe at the moment is essentially a big TV serial that just so happens to be unfolding on the big screen.
Agreed. I think the great shows of this "golden age of television"--Breaking Bad, Mad Men, Game of Thrones, The Wire, The Sopranos, Rome, Homeland, House of Cards, etc.--are proving far more ambitious and audacious than most mainstream big budget films, including the Marvel movies. Really Agents of SHIELD is a good representation of the MCU on TV, except in that medium it can be compared to something like Sherlock or Doctor Who (with much smaller budgets on BBC) and be found severely wanting.
He's referring to Alfred google-ing things about Bane. The way that whole scene plays out, it's as if he looked up information of Bane on Google.
Imma just put this here: http://srmanniac.livejournal.com/721.html
Quickly skimmed through that, interesting read, but I will have to read it again more thoroughly later. I've got a bad cold I'm fighting through at the moment.
Still, TDKR is nothing like Spider-Man 3. Flawed is one thing, being a train-wreck is something else entirely.
So you're saying TDKR is a metaphor of my life?Didnt fully nail the things it had to nail.