CaptainCanada
Shield of the True North
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2006
- Messages
- 4,626
- Reaction score
- 16
- Points
- 58
Yes, it does negate it, because it doesn't jibe remotely with those episodes as we watched them. The first ten episodes (well, the parts Brock appeared in) show him as a likeable, reasonable person who gets angry at Peter because Peter's actions appear to him to be selfish; his actions are all those of a normal person. The next two episodes throw all this out, pivot the character's entire motivation for being a villain on mental instability that has never been alluded to; thus, all the episodes previous making his anger believable and rational are thrown out.You're not negating anything; your basically retconning in an explaination for the buildup that seemed to be unrelated and unjustified. The only difference, is that it was planned from the beginning.
On top of all this, Eddie 2.0 is simply not a very interesting take on the character now, in my opinion. I was interested to see how they were going to wrangle someone with entirely rational (if misconstrued) anger into hating Peter so deeply that he'd attract Venom; the answer, apparently, is that they're going to snap their fingers and say he's crazy, and always has been.
And, wow, do I sound down on the show; apart from Eddie, everything is pretty much perfect, but they really fell on their faces with Eddie.
