I've never been a huge fan of Alex Ross's regular Superman or more precisely the face of his Superman. Too rough and stern for my taste. It works great in Kingdom Come with the older more seasoned Superman though.
Here's a good example of Fleischer design. I'm not saying Fleischer had a perfect design per say, but they did a great job making Superman look mature, and powerful. This is one Superman that's not ****ing around. The design of the face in this shot is very intentional, the hairstyle isn't designed to just have flopsy locks hanging on his forehead. It's to give the head a powerful profile, a virtual arrow pointing to where Superman is going to kick ass next, almost resembling the outline of an art deco style car. Compare this one's jaw to the one above. All of the features are just very masculine and to-the-point
I don't think it's necessarily the age Ross give Supes for me, as much as it is that his Supes' face just isn't that flattering.
Err. Meh. Gerrrrrrrrrd.Just in case it wasn't posted:
![]()
...Blyech.![]()
Oh and this...
![]()
I actually meant in general. Don't some artists design him that way? I think the dot eyes make him look older, like in Alex Ross' work. Superman shouldn't squint all the time.
An exception:
![]()
Too me, this is what Superman should always look like.
![]()
Wow...it's been a long time since I have seen a Fleischer design. I haven't watched the cartoons in years. I do see what you mean about his face being...more manly. In comparison to the Timm designs and especially the YJ designs, he looks like a man while their Supes looks very boyish.
I thought the Supes in All-Star, which is the pic I posted, looked the best I have seen him look in a while. He looks handsome and mature. Often times, I feel artist sometime sacrafice his good looks (see Identity Crisis) to make him look older, harder, etc. For me the best Supes design, especially in cartoon form, has to be an even blend of both.
I'll try to find some moving pics from All-Star, but if you have a chance to check that out let me know what you think of that design. I'd be very interested to hear your opinion.
Are you saying you prefer him to not look attractive?
Embrace the undies!
It's cool for cartoons/comics, just not on film imo.
So I watched the trailer for All Star Superman, I'll be honest, I'm not impressed. It's basically anime superman. I don't have time to write a paper comparing Fleischer to anime, but the bottom line is that in Fleischer's style, they didn't outline anything that didn't need it. Form and shape was perceivable through light and shadow, which is why screen caps from those cartoons sometimes look kind a bit weird. In motion though it registers naturally and the lighting is a ton more dynamic. Plus, there's a huge technical difference between the two styles as well: rotoscoping. The Fleischer Superman cartoons used a ton of rotoscoping to get the motion to look accurate, which is also the reason why not everything is outlined.
How does it not work on film? Kirk Alyn, George Reeves, Christopher Reeve, Dean Cain , and Brandon Routh all wore versions of the classic Superman costume.
How does it not work on film? Kirk Alyn, George Reeves, Christopher Reeve, Dean Cain , and Brandon Routh all wore versions the classic Superman costume.
I do agree about the lighting in the old cartoons. Yet, is there anything current in animation that resembles this? I kind of feel like this is an old style you are harkening to that is no longer used in modern animation. However, I am not familiar with the terms you are using, so I don't really know. I'd like to see something modern depicting the style you are talking about so I can actually see the differences you are speaking of verse the new styles.
I like All Star Supes the best out of all the animation I have seen so far.
Interesting video. I never saw the actual suit light up only in those concept art pics.