The Spectacular Spider-Man did it in a more creative way. I don't doubt that we'll see Rhino charging at something and hurting himself, but I'm hoping for a more creative defeat, too.What's funny is that the only way Rhino is ever defeated is by Spider-man leaping out of the way of Rhino's charge so that the big guy runs into something and is electrocuted.
Maybe SHIELD takes Electro and Rhino in the end, Spidey asks "where are you taking them?" and no answer is given. Then Fury appears after the credits and mentions the Vault.Well, if they truly try to map out a giant Spider-Man universe, it would be foolish to kill off their enemies quickly. I really hope that they'll create the Vault, to house all the super criminals and we'll eventually get the Sinister Six.
Spider-Man appearing in Avengers is not as unlikely as some of you might think. Sony and Marvel/Disney originally arranged for the Oscorp tower to appear in NYC's skyline in The Avengers next to the Stark Tower but the design wasn't done by the time The Avengers finished filming, making the timing the only thing that stopped it.
On top of that, Sony and Disney have already worked together. Marvel owns the merchandising rights to Spider-Man and have done all the advertisement for the first movie. There was even a Target commercial with Iron Man and Spider-Man together (the movie versions, that is) that would not exist if Sony wasn't willing to let Spider-Man be used in it.
On top of all of that, Kevin Feige has already said that Marvel and Sony have a good relationship. So it a crossover between Spidey and the Avengers is very likely to happen down the road though that is not necessarily a good thing. It has potential to be done well but there are also many problems you will run into, problems such as Spider-Man not being much of a team player and working best solo, the Spider-Man movies being turned into Avengers promos like how all the Marvel solo films were other than IM1 and TIH thus hurting the quality of Spidey's films overall, and the potential burying of lesser known Avengers characters like Black Panther or Ant-Man or Vision due to Spidey stepping in their spotlight (maybe even take everyone's spotlight). So although there is a huge chance of Spidey being brought into the MCU, let's all remember the saying "Be careful what you wish for" because there are also chances he could be brought into the MCU and have both the Spider-Man movies and Marvel Studios movies be affected in a negative way. This could go either way.
I don't think it's impossible either, but they'd have to go a long way to convince me it would actually happen.
I don't think Spider-Man needs to be in an Avengers film to be a part of the MCU. Can't he be in a Daredevil film, or a possible Secret Wars movie?
Has anyone ever thought about a possibility of Spider-Man appearing in FOX Marvel movie? I could easily see Spider-Man being with the Fantastic Four. Plus, FOX has a contract with Marc Webb saying he would direct three films for them. Maybe part of the compensation was for Sony to let them use Spider-Man or work together?
I don't think Spider-Man needs to be in an Avengers film to be a part of the MCU. Can't he be in a Daredevil film, or a possible Secret Wars movie?
Has anyone ever thought about a possibility of Spider-Man appearing in FOX Marvel movie? I could easily see Spider-Man being with the Fantastic Four. Plus, FOX has a contract with Marc Webb saying he would direct three films for them. Maybe part of the compensation was for Sony to let them use Spider-Man or work together?
Yeah, Spidey wouldn't even fit in an Avengers film right now because of his age. If they just drop little hints and references to each other like they've been doing with The Avengers (maybe make them more blatant) then that would be fine. Would be cool to bring in TASM fully in the third film with a reveal that Peter's parents were SHIELD agents though.I don't think Spider-Man needs to be in an Avengers film to be a part of the MCU. Can't he be in a Daredevil film, or a possible Secret Wars movie?
Has anyone ever thought about a possibility of Spider-Man appearing in FOX Marvel movie? I could easily see Spider-Man being with the Fantastic Four. Plus, FOX has a contract with Marc Webb saying he would direct three films for them. Maybe part of the compensation was for Sony to let them use Spider-Man or work together?
Its unfortunate that FOX has a hold of these characters. Man, I can't imagine what they would have done to Spider-Man if they had his film rights. It probably would have been like that Daredevil movie...I HIGHLY doubt that.
Marvel, being the rights holder of the character (not movie but the general character rights) would have to approve, and they would never approve of that.
Fox is more stubborn to let go or share use of characters than Sony is.
Webb is probably the only reason why this franchise has any hope. I think he did a fantastic job with the first movie, and will hopefully do well with the sequel. Just because Sony is after money, doesn't mean the movies will suck. I mean, isn't every Hollywood Studio film made for the same reasons? If they do try and make a sinister six film, that would be awesome (as long as it was done well).
Wouldn't call it a blizzard of stolen cash....more like a small dust storm of stolen cash, lol.
And I'm really surprised we never saw a sex scene between Peter and MJ in Spider-Man 3 since they were an actual couple in that film.
You are giving way too much credit to Webb,I am pretty sure had they given the project to someone who was a little action oriented aswell he would have been way successful.
The only reason the movie is good is because of the great cast,the script sucked and the direction wasnt too great either
Keep those expectations low IMO. Less disappointment.The cast has got even better now and they are seeing the script is great so I have great expectations from the sequel.
Might sound a bit old fashinoned but I prefer they keep out the sex scenes in Comic Book movies
1 film where the main villain and the 2 human right hand men live vs 3 films where 3 of the 4 main villains and 1 of the anti-heroes die? Yes.
Killing villians is mot franchise friendly and that's what Sony is after to keep Spider-Man as their cash cow in the comic movie genre.
Keep those expectations low IMO. Less disappointment.
Whoever is in the cell with Dr. Connors at the end.Two human right hand men? Dr. Ratha and...who?
If I can't count deleted scenes from other movies I like, can't count them here.Plus, can we really count Dr. Ratha? He died in a deleted scene and his chances are up in the air of returning. That's not a pro or con if his death is never shown and he still never returns in the sequel.
Not equal at all. Webb's is vastly superior.So far we only have one alive villain. It's equaled Raimi's trilogy, congrats. Let's see what happens in the sequel before we say Webb is keeping his villains alive more than Raimi's.
Whoever is in the cell with Dr. Connors at the end.
If I can't count deleted scenes from other movies I like, can't count them here.
Not equal at all. Webb's is vastly superior.
True, either way, it's someone Webb didn't kill.Which could have been Norman Osborn.
Not as big a threat as the supervillains no, but definitely can be a threat at Oscorp as shown with Dr Connors.So you count someone that may not even appear again though? Not much of a threat to Spider-Man either, so how could he be considered a villain anyways?
You seem to be giving Raimi a free pass for the 3 villains and 1 anti-hero he's killed, and it just doesn't work that way.Again, no, no it's not. Webb still has one villain that has not died...the same as Raimi's record so far. Nothing is vastly superior in that department(and I won't get into the quality of the films).
Webb doesn't have a body count other than Uncle Ben.