I don't dislike it really. I just think it won't age well.
It's just such a small thing yet it's so annoying, just button up yo damn shirt man!
That doesn't really mean much in terms of what people think. It just means people are watching it a lot. I watched it a few times, I still don't particularly like the design. SM3's trailer had tons of views, but a lot of people were complaining about the look of the symbiote suit. (And once the film came out, lots of other things).
No one is denying the film has a lot of interest and public attention. People are definitely excited and looking forward to it, but high public attention does not mean everyone loves the look of the Joker. It just means people are looking at it.
I agree.
Wouldn't be so bad if his chest wasn't covered in those ugly tattoos.
I've come to accept "prison" Joker. Street affiliated Joker. Because are just different sides we'll see a glimpse of.I won't lie. As much as Jesse is starting to grow on me as Lex and I love the casting as Leto as Joker, I think their looks are just off.
I mean let's look at the Trinity for example.
![]()
Is there really anything to hate on the design for them? No. There's nothing to hate at all. They look prefect. Only change I would have is maybe on Superman's things on his side, you have them red. Sort of have them as his red underwear or a nod to them without the underwear but overall the suits are perfect.
Then we have Lex looking like...
![]()
And Joker looking like...
![]()
I mean I'm not trying to hate but it's just odd. We got the perfect designs for Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman but Lex and Joker seem off and different you know?
Now given how Leto has no suit on and Arkham sweatpants, when looking at his jacket hopefully we do see him in more of an Arkham Origins/Bermejo Joker design which I would love.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Still think Leto will kill it. Always have.
the worst part of the Empire cover isn't the tattoos, the shirtlessness, or the jacket. It's the fact that the blue Arkham sweatpants don't match that purple jacket at all. It just looks wrong. I realize that he probably just broke out and doesn't have time to get different pants. But still. It's not visually pleasing.
I dunno, in that manip he does, but I can't see his tatz or grillz. We'll see in SS, but right now, I think Ledger would match up better aesthetically.I know many people don't like Joker's new design, but there's no denying that visually, he matches up with Batfleck extremely well.
That look of his fits in with the context of the situation he's in. We all know he's going to be wearing a variety of outfits.
I think they'll have him more classic in Affleck's Batman movie, obviously if he appears.
Will the tats and teeth remain as they are? Probably. But the solution to that is:
1. Goes to see a top dentist.
2. Takes another dip in the chemicals and that removes the ink from his body.
Sorted.
If it had of received overwhelming backlash and negativity, I think they would've done something like that.I think neither of those things will happen.
What happened to you man? You seemed like you were on board with things a while back![]()
If that's your attitude, I don't think this movie is for you anyway.