Astro13Zombie
Superhero
- Joined
- May 28, 2008
- Messages
- 9,287
- Reaction score
- 1,648
- Points
- 103
a friend i went with is positively in love with jared as the joker. she wants to go and see it again just for his 10 or so minutes of screen time.Beautiful![]()
The make-up is the same, but the lighting and color grading are different. I agree it looks better.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/jared-letos-joker-was-inspired-by-david-bowie"I spoke to a writer and we discussed David Bowie a bit, not necessarily the music of David, but his class, his elegance, his timelessness," Leto told NME. "I don't wanna say who the guy was, but he's a famous writer in the world of DC. Bowie was definitely one of the people we spoke about."
Somebody - I presume Ayer - sat down and seriously thought that this would be a good motivation for the Joker to have in a movie. The Joker.
Somebody - I presume Ayer - sat down and seriously thought that this would be a good motivation for the Joker to have in a movie. The Joker.
Nah, if I had to make a guess, it was the WB execs. It sounds like exactly the kind of thing a risk-averse executive focus group would decide to change to make it "lighter".
Ayer may have had Joker pursuing Harley Quinn, but at least he originally had the relationship be genuinely screwed up and abusive ( and apparently ending with Joker ditching her and everyone with a grenade? ).
I think we can assume that the rescue was part of the reshoots in order to fix the whole, abusive angle of their relationship to something more vanilla and less offensive to the world.Does that mean that in his cut the ending was different, or did he still break into Bellereve and rescued her ??? Because that would have been really schizophrenic, then again it would work with their whole love/hate relationship.
Does that mean that in his cut the ending was different, or did he still break into Bellereve and rescued her ??? Because that would have been really schizophrenic, then again it would work with their whole love/hate relationship.
Leto's talented and committed enough that I'm willing to give him another shot with a different story/director. As much as I was off-put by his performance here, the editing and lack of character did him no favors.To me, this Joker was off-putting in a bad way, both in his look and his performance. Ledger and Nicholson were magnetic and really fun to watch. This Joker felt like a weird creep and I wouldn't really wanna watch him for a whole movie. He was not scary or threatening. That's just how I feel, unfortunately. I had really high hopes for Leto.
no, i mean the very end. they do end up back in prison, i just don't remember if he breaks her out of if she stays with the rest. the fact is, suicied squad needs harley's star power, i doubt the sequel would work without her. she and the joker could be the targets in it if it ever gets made.
Leto's talented and committed enough that I'm willing to give him another shot with a different story/director. As much as I was off-put by his performance here, the editing and lack of character did him no favors.
There's still lots of potential without changing a single thing.
No the very ending i.e the prison escape is the same in both cuts I believe.
I think that is probably true. One of the deleted parts was Katana looking at her sword after taking a soul into it and I guess those monsters that Enchantress makes have no souls so maybe it was after she killed some of Joker's men.Well, the one theory I saw is that the original ending was basically a giant three way fight between the Enchantress and her mooks, Joker and *his* mooks, and the Squad. . . and there was no "conquer the world" element, just Enchantress wanting to be free, the Joker wanting to make chaos, and the Squad trying to not-die.
Bingo! In a movie like this with so many wildcard villains, The Joker has to be the baddest of them all, the most threatening even if he's not apart of the Suicide Squad. The criminal underworld certainly knew about him but beyond that he's not really a real threat. I would have liked Waller to at least make note of him somehow.For as cool as it was would the movie have suffered if it was removed? Not at all. The Joker ended up taking up a lot of space in the runtime and nothing more. It's a shame too because he's a dynamic character that should have had more to do.
What really bugged me was no one else on the Suicide Squad nor the government cronies ever really acknowledged the Joker as a problem. There was a weird disconnect between his existence and the rest of Task Force X. Almost like they were in separate movies.
That's actually quite terrifying
