samsnee
Ok
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2006
- Messages
- 23,489
- Reaction score
- 16,768
- Points
- 103
...Ariel didn't leavd the sea just for a boy in the animated movie.
Reboots really need to stop trying to act like they are groundbreaking. Reminds me of Charmed reboot saying they would be feminist.
...Ariel didn't leavd the sea just for a boy in the animated movie.
Reboots really need to stop trying to act like they are groundbreaking. Reminds me of Charmed reboot saying they would be feminist.
Time to be controversial.Ariel wanted to leave before she even met Eric. She had been collecting human artifacts for years.
Time to be controversial.
While Ariel clearly has a fascination with the land and those who walk it, the way the film plays out, ties her actual motivation to "get off her fin" is to be with the boy. Ariel, who loves to sing, gives it up, not to walk on land or to be free. It's for the boy. The tug-of-war in her heart isn't between the land and the sea. It's between her father and her husband. It plays into the classic sexist trope of a woman leaving home once she finds her husband. It's why five minutes after meeting Eric, they get married. Even in BatB, they spend a good amount of time together. The seasons change, they montage, etc. All Ariel knows about boy, is boy pretty. And that's enough for her to enter a deal where she has to make him fall in love with her.
I do agree these companies speak up the way they've "changed" things, without much thought to what they're actually saying. But I also think that the Little Mermaid as a story, could easily be updated to be more feminist then the original tale. The same applies to my beloved Charmed. Where Cole was a thing.
I didn't watch any of the new show, so I can't comment on that. With Cole. For two and half seasons, they basically had Phoebe's entire character revolve around him. She gave up her agency, put her sisters at risk, and even "went evil" for a little while, because boy. While boy went through the, "Being a better man for you" trope that's just... sigh. To cap it all, it only end up ending do to him trying to "do the right thing" but being consumed by the evil he takes back only to save Phoebe.As far as Cole, he didn't make the show less feminist. The reboot was less feminist than the original
Time to be controversial.
While Ariel clearly has a fascination with the land and those who walk it, the way the film plays out, ties her actual motivation to "get off her fin" is to be with the boy. Ariel, who loves to sing, gives it up, not to walk on land or to be free. It's for the boy. The tug-of-war in her heart isn't between the land and the sea. It's between her father and her husband. It plays into the classic sexist trope of a woman leaving home once she finds her husband. It's why five minutes after meeting Eric, they get married. Even in BatB, they spend a good amount of time together. The seasons change, they montage, etc. All Ariel knows about boy, is boy pretty. And that's enough for her to enter a deal where she has to make him fall in love with her.
I do agree these companies speak up the way they've "changed" things, without much thought to what they're actually saying. But I also think that the Little Mermaid as a story, could easily be updated to be more feminist then the original tale. The same applies to my beloved Charmed. Where Cole was a thing.
But we got to see the Charmed Ones in skimpy outfits and at one time Alyson Hannigan naked on a horse. Feminism.I didn't watch any of the new show, so I can't comment on that. With Cole. For two and half seasons, they basically had Phoebe's entire character revolve around him. She gave up her agency, put her sisters at risk, and even "went evil" for a little while, because boy. While boy went through the, "Being a better man for you" trope that's just... sigh. To cap it all, it only end up ending do to him trying to "do the right thing" but being consumed by the evil he takes back only to save Phoebe.
That Cole and thus Phoebe's story turns on it's head due to McMahon most likely asking to leave, doesn't help, because it emphasizes the not so feminist tropeness of it.
I'm a fan of your friend.I remember one of my friends and I were having a silly, fun argument about Disney movies. I can't remember why but I distinctly remember her going IN on The Little Mermaid and her saying "that's the wrong message to send to girls, I never fell for that Part of Your World bulls***!"
I laughed my ass off at that.
No comment on Charmed and the whole problematic Phoebe/Cole relationship. I still blame them for Prue's death, I'm not over it. But I digress.
Girl's never even seen a human penis. Of course she's curious.
I didn't watch any of the new show, so I can't comment on that. With Cole. For two and half seasons, they basically had Phoebe's entire character revolve around him. She gave up her agency, put her sisters at risk, and even "went evil" for a little while, because boy. While boy went through the, "Being a better man for you" trope that's just... sigh. To cap it all, it only end up ending do to him trying to "do the right thing" but being consumed by the evil he takes back only to save Phoebe.
That Cole and thus Phoebe's story turns on it's head due to McMahon most likely asking to leave, doesn't help, because it emphasizes the not so feminist tropeness of it.
But we got to see the Charmed Ones in skimpy outfits and at one time Alyson Hannigan naked on a horse. Feminism.![]()
Did I use the wrong name and was too lazy to change it?That was (could've) been a good journey for Phoebe. It was a source of contention between her and her sisters.
Not Alyson Hannigan! Lmao
Willow aint bout the sexy outfit/naked on a horse life
Part of Your World existed before Ariel meets Eric. Ariel was really obsessed about the land before she meets Eric.I remember one of my friends and I were having a silly, fun argument about Disney movies. I can't remember why but I distinctly remember her going IN on The Little Mermaid and her saying "that's the wrong message to send to girls, I never fell for that Part of Your World bulls***!"