StarLord
<<<<<<<<<<
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2009
- Messages
- 23,882
- Reaction score
- 6,973
- Points
- 103
Depends on the crew filming it.
If it's half as good as how Guardians looked, I'll be impressed.
Depends on the crew filming it.
It it is half as good looking as Guardians, it is gonna be one ugly movie.If it's half as good as how Guardians looked, I'll be impressed.
Happy Birthday!
Thanks, Ice. Marvel loves me and I love them.Happy Birthday mate!!
Marvel loves you!
Ant-Man is the start of Phase 3...
It it is half as good looking as Guardians, it is gonna be one ugly movie.![]()
The ones they put them in.Which non-Avengers films should Black Widow, Hawkeye and the twins show up in?
Which non-Avengers films should Black Widow, Hawkeye and the twins show up in?
Ant-Man is the start of Phase 3...
When I say ugly, I mean people are gonna get fired because the film will look like it was shot in the 1920s.Which is kind of what I'm looking forward too.
Hauntingly ugly and weird, but beautiful at the same time.
I don't think they will wait that long for it. Also, the Guardians will need a reason to come to Earth in Infinity War. What better way to learn about the Tesseract, Thanos, Chitauri, etc from Earth. Having the Hulk reveal that A - gets them involved in the story, B - Gets Hulk back on Earth. It is win-win.
When I say ugly, I mean people are gonna get fired because the film will look like it was shot in the 1920s.t:
Which means they changed it, because forever and a day Ant-Man was the start of Phase 3. Afterall, every phase is suppose to end with the Avengers.I think they mentioned that CW was phase 3..?
I also think GOTG2 is Planet Hulk.
Honestly, with Captain Marvel's placement in between the two Infinity War installments, it wouldn't surprise me if Mar-Vell was a significant part in Infinity War: Part 1 and most of Carol's origin story plays out in that film. That way the Captain Marvel film wouldn't technically be an origin story (if Marvel's "no more origins" mantra turns out to be true).I'm cool with Carol Danvers as Captain Marvel but they absolutely have to introduce Mar-Vell of the Kree in the film as well. I will be very disappointed if they gloss over the very important part of Marvel lore.
Guardians looks pretty darn good, digital problems aside. But it isn't exactly 2001 or Skyfall. A film that looks "half" that quality, would be pretty flippin' choppy.I don't know what you were looking at when you saw Guardians, but I didn't see any of that I'm afraid.
Would be a great way to keep Pym around and give him something to do that has meat in the MCU. He could basically take Tony's role in CW but by the end of it he is mostly on board with the whole superhero thing
I'll take a smaller role in the 1st team film for the amount of man-of-the-match / MVP moments he had in that film, although hopefully he gets more in AoU ((& I think he does). I bet he's a lot of the GA's favourite after that. And we weren't even guaranteed to get Hulk in an Avengers film, but after that performance they will disappoint a lot of regular guys if they ever drop him. If they start using stories that don't have him getting chased around they'll realise there's tonnes of good material they could use to make Hulk one of their leading solo characters as well as team superstars. But I do think doing a good Hulk film takes more skill than doing a good Cap or Iron Man.
If they've proven anything, it's that they're good at spinning a lot of plates at once. Ant-man might not be getting a lot of the spotlight right now but I'm sure that will change soon.By the way, I'm not disappointed in the announcements...I'm just saying that Ant Man is being overlooked. Ant Man is my least anticipated Marvel Studios movie ever, so it isn't a huge deal to me.
I think Black Widow and Hawkeye should play a big part in the Civil War and show up in any films that focus on it. They'll likely be more central to it than Thor, SW, QS, Vision and anyone new.Which non-Avengers films should Black Widow, Hawkeye and the twins show up in?