• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Nine most racist Disney characters ever

bah... In my opinion, Dinsey should be MORE racist!

Bring us cartoons about hate crimes against blind black jewish homosexual women or something:cmad:
 
Corinthian™;13429527 said:
bah... In my opinion, Dinsey should be MORE racist!

Bring us cartoons about hate crimes against blind black jewish homosexual women or something:cmad:

Agree also WB should bring looney tunes back with racicst themes
 
my youth? your a whole 3 years older.. and your sOOOO twisting things.. my god... you act as if im supporting these images. My god do you have issues...

and im just leaving it at that

Those "three" years have allowed me to recognize propaganda when I see it. If you want to be naive and accept things that are askew as entertaining, ok then. But stop whining when other people see it as it is.

If your not so young, you should be able to be mature enough to see through the advertising of lollipops and sunshine. This is a business of selling images. Images that SHOULD be easy to relate with. After all that's how the multi-million dollar Princess line makes its profit. So, go ahead, keep your head in the clouds. No wonder why the view is rosy and extremely unclear.

Then again what should I expect from someone who really believes that people were content with subservient lifestyles. Even though it wasn't in their own uneducated words. :o

BTW my profile is incorrect.

One more thing...you got far more upset about this than I did. What does that say about you?
 
hell i would love to see a white cartoon character drawn my all these other races that poked fun at us... id laugh right along with them

now I have to wonder if this cartoon was made after years of being part of a underclass.
how hard would you be laughing?
you don't understand, racism isn't about making people ugly or evil.
it's, again, a separation based upon assumptions on one's race.

but anyway....

22415723.jpg


we seem to have taken the left turn at one point or another.
 
You know I'd agree with you on the whole mocking the "meet-n-marry" theme in Disney, but the writers totally let it happen in the end with Idina's character.

I'm not saying we should hold it against them, but the change didn't happen over night. The writers and animators didn't just wake up and say, "hey this isn't funny any more and it's kinda cruel as well." Nope, they got sanctioned by the government and had public demands to measure up to.

Change in entertainment has to be fought for, just as much as change in other areas too. If people just lay back and accept what's given to them, how are things going to get better? Someone has to question it.

Speaking of the female image of Disney, why did they make a big point in Shrek to make fun of it all. It's one of the most successful parodies I've ever seen.

I think as far as Idina's character in Enchanted, it was allowed because they went back to the fantasy world where that does happen.

The animators today aren't living in the past, they changed with the times too. We can't just assume because Disney put out things like Uncle Remus that that's the standard now. I have box sets of old Disney animated shorts that are prefaced with reminders of when it was released, just to remind people that things are different now. There's no head of animation demanding that they stay in the lines of old stereotypes because it's just easier for them. They're a fairly diverse group themselves these days, and they're not going to let that happen....the changes that they made to The Princess and the Frog are proof of that.

We really didn't see any changes start to happen until the new animation era in the 90s--before then all the princesses were waiting for their prince to come, or working as maids, and not very bright. With Ariel, we got that great line in her first song about "bright young women, sick of swimming, ready to stand..." and we got Belle, Jasmine, Pocohantas, Mulan. They were strong characters, not these weak swooning princesses we had back in the 1940s.

I completely agree with you about the changes being needed, especially when you see how it was done in the past. But I think they're moving in a good direction now.
 
Those "three" years have allowed me to recognize propaganda when I see it. If you want to be naive and accept things that are askew as entertaining, ok then. But stop whining when other people see it as it is.

If your not so young, you should be able to be mature enough to see through the advertising of lollipops and sunshine. This is a business of selling images. Images that SHOULD be easy to relate with. After all that's how the multi-million dollar Princess line makes its profit. So, go ahead, keep your head in the clouds. No wonder why the view is rosy and extremely unclear.

Then again what should I expect from someone who really believes that people were content with subservient lifestyles. Even though it wasn't in their own uneducated words. :o

BTW my profile is incorrect.

One more thing...you got far more upset about this than I did. What does that say about you?

so in other words, i have to think like you :whatever:

i can see through it just fine, you act like im a stranger to this. I grew up watching this stuff.. not once did it ever make me feel different torwards other races.. hell i just viewed them as cartoon characters i enjoyed and that was it. It's had no effect on me today.
 
Those "three" years have allowed me to recognize propaganda when I see it. If you want to be naive and accept things that are askew as entertaining, ok then. But stop whining when other people see it as it is.

If your not so young, you should be able to be mature enough to see through the advertising of lollipops and sunshine. This is a business of selling images. Images that SHOULD be easy to relate with. After all that's how the multi-million dollar Princess line makes its profit. So, go ahead, keep your head in the clouds. No wonder why the view is rosy and extremely unclear.

Then again what should I expect from someone who really believes that people were content with subservient lifestyles. Even though it wasn't in their own uneducated words. :o

BTW my profile is incorrect.

One more thing...you got far more upset about this than I did. What does that say about you?

ps. im upset because A) your putting words in my mouth and B) making me sound as if im oblivious and racist
 
stuff like this bugs me disney movies were happy memories from my childhood i look back on it as safety and happiness ect ect so why do people try and point out the flaw in what used to be acceptable at the end of the day this stuff isnt acceptable anymore so people should stop trying to **** up disney i personally dont care if the films offend some people it hardly south park and it hardly gonna make kids start goose stepping so people should just quit trying to make everything about the world horrible and just leave some things be
 
Uncle Remus was tapping his master's wife...you know it. :o

---Morzan
 
This is so wrong of me to say, but Coal Black was pretty hot. :csad:
 
The most ironic thing is,when Aryans see these things..they laugh and shrug it off.Other people would be insulted or wonder how such things were ever allowed to be done in the first place.
 
The most ironic thing is,when Aryans see these things..they laugh and shrug it off.Other people would be insulted or wonder how such things were ever allowed to be done in the first place.

ummm.... ignorant are we?


that was a pretty bigoted comment
 
The most ironic thing is,when Aryans see these things..they laugh and shrug it off.Other people would be insulted or wonder how such things were ever allowed to be done in the first place.

While "I" understand why you phrased it that way,... You are in error by using it in this case.

See below.

Racial connotations
Main article: Aryan race
Because of ethnolinguistic arguments about connections between peoples and cultural values, "Aryan" peoples were often considered to be distinct from Semitic peoples. By the end of the nineteenth century "Aryan" was used as a synonym for Indo-European, and this popular usage persists even after some academic authors have condemned a such usage because of its negative connotations derived from the Nazi-era. In linguistics, it is still used in the context of the sub-branch of Indo-Iranians referred to as Indo-Aryans, all though that usage has also been condemned and proposed to be replaced by the term Indic languages.

The Aryan race was a term used in the early 20th century by European racial theorists who believed strongly in the division of humanity into biologically distinct races with differing characteristics. Such writers believed that the Proto-Indo-Europeans constituted a specific race that had expanded across parts of Europe, Iran and small parts of northern India. This usage tends to merge the Sanskrit meaning of "noble" or "elevated" with the idea of distinctive behavioral and ancestral ethnicity marked by language distribution.

From the late 19th century, a number of writers had argued that the Proto-Indo-Europeans had originated in Europe. Their opinion was received critically at first, but was widely accepted by the end of the nineteenth century. By 1905 Hermann Hirt in his Die Indogermanen (Hirt consistently used Indogermanen, not Arier, to refer to the Indo-Europeans) claimed that the scales had tilted in favour of the hypothesis, in particular claiming the plains of northern Germany as the Urheimat (p. 197) and connecting the "blond type" (p. 192) with the core population of the early, "pure" Indo-Europeans. This argument developed in tandem with Nordicism, the theory that the "Nordic race" of fair-haired north Europeans were innately superior to other peoples. The identification of the Proto-Indo-Europeans with the north German Corded Ware culture bolstered this position. This was first proposed by Gustaf Kossinna in 1902, and gained in currency over the following two decades, until V. Gordon Childe who in his 1926 The Aryans: a study of Indo-European origins concluded that "the Nordics' superiority in physique fitted them to be the vehicles of a superior language" (a belief which he later regretted having expressed).

The idea became a matter of national pride in learned circles of Germany, and was taken up by the Nazis. According to Alfred Rosenberg's ideology the "Aryan-Nordic" (arisch-nordisch) or "Nordic-Atlantean" (nordisch-atlantisch) race was thus a master race, at the top of a racial hierarchy, pitted against a "Jewish-Semitic" (jüdisch-semitisch) race, deemed to be a racial threat to Germany's homogeneous Aryan civilization, thus rationalizing Nazi anti-Semitism. Nazism portrayed their interpretation of an "Aryan race" as the only race capable of, or with an interest in, creating and maintaining culture and civilizations, while other races are merely capable of conversion, or destruction of culture. These arguments derived from late nineteenth century racial hierarchies. Some Nazis were also influenced by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky's The Secret Doctrine (1888) where she postulates "Aryans" as the fifth of her "Root Races", dating them to about a million years ago, tracing them to Atlantis, an idea also repeated by Rosenberg, and held as doctrine by the Thule Society. Such theories were used to justify the introduction of the so-called "Aryan laws" by the Nazis, depriving "non-Aryans" of citizenship and employment rights, and prohibiting marriage between Aryans and non-Aryans. Though Mussolini's fascism was not originally characterised by explicit anti-Semitism, he too eventually introduced laws pressed upon him by Hitler, prohibiting mixed-race marriages between "Aryans" and Jews.

Because of historical racist use of Aryan, and especially use of Aryan race in connection with the propaganda of Nazism, the word is sometimes avoided in the West as being tainted, in the same manner as the swastika symbol. Currently, India and Iran are the only countries to use the word Aryan in a demographic denomination. Aryan is also a common male name in India, Afghanistan, and Iran.
 
On the street,... "Aryan" = Racist White Person.

Period.
 
Id have to say the Lion King. How can 2 black parents give birth to Michael J Fox?

Oh and Goliath from Gargoyles, in one season when he was human he was black, but when they did the same trick in the last season (Goliath chronicles) he was white. wtf?
 
Id have to say the Lion King. How can 2 black parents give birth to Michael J Fox?

Oh and Goliath from Gargoyles, in one season when he was human he was black, but when they did the same trick in the last season (Goliath chronicles) he was white. wtf?


I seem to recall Wayland Smithers being black in the first seaon of the Simpsons. Maybe it was just a tan. :wow:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,262
Messages
22,074,425
Members
45,876
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"