GL1
It's pronounced "glee"
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2004
- Messages
- 6,188
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I already have admitted it's entirely possible that Robin will be there. Just not in Nolan's watch. As soon as he goes away and the franchise decays Robin will appear.
I don't like the way that you attached Robin to franchise decay. It's also illogcal and fallacious here.
The interesting thing is, Nolan says he's not interested in Robin, yet I believe a Teen Titans film - which is supposed to feature Robin - is currently in pre-production. So we could end up in a situation where Robin's on-screen return doesn't happen in a Batman movie.
I certainly wouldn't mind that. I'd prefer a Robin solo film over a TT film, though.
This discussion seems to have two sides, that I can see. A side who doesn't want Robin in the film, for unknown reasons, a side which includes Bale and Nolan. And a side who has experience through comics and other media with Robin as a viable, realistic, dark supporting cast character - the kind that fits perfectly into Nolan's world.
The argument comes from the Anti-Robin side drawing incorrect conclusions about what Robin is narratively capable of, and the Pro-Robin side drawing incorrect conclusions about how mandatory his inclusion is.
Robin is a great character. All of the complaints about his character and what he can and can't do can be answered with issue numbers, for those willing to do all that research. Having a problem with the character or his ability to fit in the Nolanverse seems pretty obtuse to me.
But he doesn't have to be in the movie. There are several things about Batman that I love that Nolan decided not to include... this would just be another one of them. Nolan-verse are great movies, no doubt about that... but they are by no means quintessential or definitive Batman.