Q & A w/Louis Leterrier: Round 2

FIRST DRAFT. It might be changed, altered or whatever. FYI I know how many times he talks. Finally and once again, if someone gets hurt or killed while he defends himself, is he a killer? No.

1) How many times does he talk and in what manner? (ie: is it clear this is a separate mind or will this just be seen as Banner exerting some control over the raging brute?) You can pm me that answer if you wish, I wont repeat it if you don't want me to.

2) On killing...I would agree someone dying indirectly from his defending himself would not make him a killer (he did this in an entirely unintentional manner in Ang Lee's Hulk with Talbot).
His killing directly though...that's another matter. Self-defense or not, then yes, that does make him a killer, especially if he is shown to be intelligent at the time, rather than just a mute raging beast.*

Thing is, the Hulk, when intelligent, knows how strong he is. He knows he cant strike back at humans with anything like his full power without killing them so he instinctively does not do it, not even when they are trying their damnedest to kill him. This is his base morality at work, and the reason why his killing anyone, either by accident or design, is a problematic idea at best (imo).

*You raised King Kong as a comparison elsewhere...would it be fair for me to think right now, without seeing anything else at this point, that a Kong like theme for Hulk is not unlike what they have in mind? What I mean here is this: When Hulk kills, is it more excusable because they have done him in a manner where there is no higher intelligence and base morality to guide his actions at that time in the story? Atm, all I know is
he kills a soldier, no details, just kills some anonymous soldier

Again, you can pm the details of how that scene works out and the answer won't go no further if you don't want it to.

You mention your experience, what experience? All scripts are not always final. So are you in the industry or are you just a fanboy? If the latter, let us see a trailer, clip or something substantiating your opinion to be considered fact.

I'm not in the industry, so yep, I am "just a fanboy"...however...My being 'just a fanboy' doesn't disqualify my opinions, observations or experiences, such as they are....
Whatever, my more detailed experience of leaked script to final film precedents are these:
Fantastic Four, Batman Begins, X-Men- the Last Stand, Superman Returns.

With all 4 films the major plots points concerning story and characters were all leaked (before filming had even started with a couple of them) and almost all stayed the same for the final product. Tweaks were made, yes, changes to most of the main plots points and characters, Nope.

Now since you are in the loop in some way I'm willing to accept your word that things have been or can be changed quite drastically from what we have heard from that first draft.

And to be honest I do hope you are right there too, at least on those 2 issues I've made clear I personally really don't like. But like I said above, this fanboy's experience with these movies does suggest significant change, even to first draft scripts, is not very likely.
 
1) How many times does he talk and in what manner? (ie: is it clear this is a separate mind or will this just be seen as Banner exerting some control over the raging brute?) You can pm me that answer if you wish, I wont repeat it if you don't want me to.

2) On killing...I would agree someone dying indirectly from his defending himself would not make him a killer (he did this in an entirely unintentional manner in Ang Lee's Hulk with Talbot).
His killing directly though...that's another matter. Self-defense or not, then yes, that does make him a killer, especially if he is shown to be intelligent at the time, rather than just a mute raging beast.*

Thing is, the Hulk, when intelligent, knows how strong he is. He knows he cant strike back at humans with anything like his full power without killing them so he instinctively does not do it, not even when they are trying their damnedest to kill him. This is his base morality at work, and the reason why his killing anyone, either by accident or design, is a problematic idea at best (imo).

*You raised King Kong as a comparison elsewhere...would it be fair for me to think right now, without seeing anything else at this point, that a Kong like theme for Hulk is not unlike what they have in mind? What I mean here is this: When Hulk kills, is it more excusable because they have done him in a manner where there is no higher intelligence and base morality to guide his actions at that time in the story? Atm, all I know is
he kills a soldier, no details, just kills some anonymous soldier

Again, you can pm the details of how that scene works out and the answer won't go no further if you don't want it to.



I'm not in the industry, so yep, I am "just a fanboy"...however...My being 'just a fanboy' doesn't disqualify my opinions, observations or experiences, such as they are....
Whatever, my more detailed experience of leaked script to final film precedents are these:
Fantastic Four, Batman Begins, X-Men- the Last Stand, Superman Returns.

With all 4 films the major plots points concerning story and characters were all leaked (before filming had even started with a couple of them) and almost all stayed the same for the final product. Tweaks were made, yes, changes to most of the main plots points and characters, Nope.

Now since you are in the loop in some way I'm willing to accept your word that things have been or can be changed quite drastically from what we have heard from that first draft.

And to be honest I do hope you are right there too, at least on those 2 issues I've made clear I personally really don't like. But like I said above, this fanboy's experience with these movies does suggest significant change, even to first draft scripts, is not very likely.

Agreed on ALL points Wobbly, but to single one out, a Hulk who kills, directly because of HIS actions, is not the Hulk to me, i dont give a **** what anyone says or who's interpretation of the character it is, its wrong, plain and simple.
 
lol, still this BS, this is just sad :(
 
Now that it has died off, let me kick start it again by saying:

I think the Hulk should kill bystanders in the film. And he should be able to talk too!

j/k
 
Sorry to go so off topic, but I need to say this:

Wobbly, I love the new avatar.
 
^ Louis Leterrier said it so it's his opinion. We'll see what changed when the movie comes out.
 
Didn't the Hulk kill David Banner? He must've known his father wouldn't have been able to handle his power, yet willingly gave it to him.
 
Didn't the Hulk kill David Banner? He must've known his father wouldn't have been able to handle his power, yet willingly gave it to him.

Technically no, the Nuke killed his father.
Whether his power would have killed Daddy or just left him a giant Jellyfish blob type thingie we will never know.
 
^ No it's not BS. The difference is this is Marvel's baby...not another studio, and just because that happened w/X3 doesn't mean every film after that must be the same. X3 had it's share of changes. Another difference is there are very few complaints about this Hulk script except from fanboy extremists. In general the script reviews have all been highly positive.
 
^ No it's not BS. The difference is this is Marvel's baby...not another studio, and just because that happened w/X3 doesn't mean every film after that must be the same. X3 had it's share of changes. Another difference is there are very few complaints about this Hulk script except from fanboy extremists. In general the script reviews have all been highly positive.

What reviews?
Afaik only a handful of people have seen it?
 
More than a handful of people have seen it. I have it but wont' read it till the movie comes out.
 
^ No it's not BS. The difference is this is Marvel's baby...not another studio, and just because that happened w/X3 doesn't mean every film after that must be the same. X3 had it's share of changes. Another difference is there are very few complaints about this Hulk script except from fanboy extremists. In general the script reviews have all been highly positive.

:whatever: No the bolded statement is bull**** AD.

A fanboy extremest complains about Spidey having organic webbing, or Johnny Storm's hair not being blond, or the Johnny Blaze GR using the penance stare when it belonged to the Dan Ketch version.

I havent heard ONE complaint like this in regards to TIH. Changing a character is a completely valid complaint.
 
^ Valid or not...there have been very few complaints. Every comic book film has had the character changed, storyline's changed, etc...Look at Spider-Man with Mary Jane & Gwen being switched, look at the liberties Raimi took with Sandman, look at Blade, look at what they did with Daredevil and Kingpin, look at the X-Men that everyone praises and what Singer did with his writers. Tim Burton's and Nolan's Batman's didn't 100% respect the origins in the comics. Things were changed...greatly yet the movies were great.

The movie Universe will never be exactly the same. You can either get all worked up over it and complain...or you can accept it and weight the positives against the negatives and enjoy the damn film....instead of complaining about a work in progress draft you heard about or possibly read.
 
AD, can you ask Lois if we will get a trailer in December? Either that, or you can ask him when they will start the advertising for the film. If I recall correctly, Ang Lee's Hulk had way more hype, as well as ads and promotions. Although, it angered me to see that all their Hulk pic had Hulk's face covered. That was the case for half the movie too.
 
The "gonna grab ya" poster was indeed WAY overused.
 
I agree. Towards the end they came out with some Hulk drawings that had his face showing, but they didn't look too much like the Hulk from the movie.
 
^ Valid or not...there have been very few complaints. Every comic book film has had the character changed, storyline's changed, etc...Look at Spider-Man with Mary Jane & Gwen being switched, look at the liberties Raimi took with Sandman, look at Blade, look at what they did with Daredevil and Kingpin, look at the X-Men that everyone praises and what Singer did with his writers. Tim Burton's and Nolan's Batman's didn't 100% respect the origins in the comics. Things were changed...greatly yet the movies were great.

The movie Universe will never be exactly the same. You can either get all worked up over it and complain...or you can accept it and weight the positives against the negatives and enjoy the damn film....instead of complaining about a work in progress draft you heard about or possibly read.

For one, MJ and Gwen were not switched, they were combined, for two, in those movies the changes MADE SENSE.

That is the big difference here, i know changes will be made, and as long as they are FOR A REASON i'll accept them.

Honestly, what does making Hulk a killer do to enhance the character? I'm sure you will come with something to say to defend this precious movie of yours, but i bet it wont be plausible.
 
If the Hulk kills people by accident than making Hulk a remorseful killer shows that he makes mistakes too. Later they can build on it, where the Hulk is extra cautious so that he doesn't hurt anyone and it turns out to work against him, as some villains get away (or something). They can turn this into a psychological struggle for the Hulk, to show that he doesn't want to be the reckless beast he sometimes is, yet he likes it when he loses control.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,301
Messages
22,082,395
Members
45,882
Latest member
Charles Xavier
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"