Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]473309[/split]
About the remake thing, I believe a film cannot be judge for something it doesn't try to be. You can't criticize a comedy for not having enough scares or a drama for not having enough action. And just because this is a remake, it doesn't mean it's a copy of the original. Quite the opposite, as many have stated, this feels like a new film entirely.
For example, I read a lot of reviews complaining about the lack of the dry humor from the first one. But the new Rocobop doesn't try that, it doesn't try to have the same humor of the first one, so how can't it be a flaw? If it tried and failed, then yes, you could say about that, but not just because it has the same name.
So in the end I believe the critics were unfair. Not this film deserver only praise, but in my eyes it was considerable better than Elysium, for example. Yet the latter got more positive reviews.
^In fairness I dont think you will find anyone who likes this over the original
To be honest I had hardly ever heard anyone praising or let alone mentioning the original - until this remake. I'm surprised to realize it's so loved and respected.
I agree, I think this one was good enough movie to begin a franchise, but the numbers are not very promising, sadly
So robocop dropped to fourth this week behind some newcomers Pompeii and 3 days to kill. It did 9.3 million bringing it domestic totals to 43 million while world wide it's at 105 million.
That doesn't sound too good especially with its 100 million+ $ budget.
That doesn't sound too good especially with its 100 million+ $ budget.
Ya, It just wasn't a well put together movie, it just felt pieced together and rushed. Not a lot of continuity or character development, that being said I'd think it will be a decent DvD/Blu Ray movie to have imo.
I felt this movie would of benefitted more if it followed the original more with today's CGI. The impact of Murphy's death in original was hands down great, as well as the office workers death while testing the ED-209. The hunting of Robocop was classic, this felt stripped down to some degree.
No it should cross two hundred million with ease which was the studios expectation. They were never really banking on the us domestic BO , I think it would of been nice but nesscary.
Meanwhile, RoboCop is traveling well overseas but the question is will the re-envisioned remake break even? Remember they also have to recoup marketing and distribution costs both domestically and internationally and it’s currently at $43.8M here (of which exhibitors get roughly half). With over $17.7M internationally from this weekend, worldwide right now (updated this morning) is about $143.8M (budget is about $106M). Still to open in the big market of China, but that’s a lot of dough to recoup. So don’t know how MGM isn’t going to lose its shirt on this one. Hope it breaks even. Word is it may do $240M to $250M.
In its 4th weekend, MGM and Columbia Pictures’ Robocop hit the $100M mark internationally, adding an estimated $17.7M. Sony Pictures Releasing International’s take was an estimated $13.9M for the weekend and a cume of $72.7M, while MGM’s distribution partners contributed an estimated $3.8M for a cume of $27.3M. The movie is now playing in 75 markets and had a No. 1 bow in Brazil with an estimated $3.4M on 697 screens. That’s no big surprise given director José Padilha’s popularity at home.
and didn't hellboy get a sequel because it did really well in dvd sales too?
$200mil plus is not enough. Not close, especially with the horrible domestic numbers. Too many seem to forget that distribution and marketing add another %50 at least to the cost.
http://www.deadline.com/2014/02/box...-costners-3-days-to-kill-no-2-buries-pompeii/
It is at around $144mil WW at this point. It is going to need to at least double for a prayer to break even.
Also, something quite interesting about how the international box office has been cut up.
http://www.deadline.com/2014/02/int...n-of-smaug-sets-records-for-warner-bros-more/
So why exactly do you think the deadline article brought it up?^Marketing costs never come into the budget and profits with other movies Darth so it shouldnt here. If the movie makes $200 million WW then it has broke even, same as with any other movie only budget comes into it when it comes to profits.
Other movies which didnt make their budget back domestically have had sequels as well, Hellboy, G.I Joe: Rise Of Cobra, X-Men: First Class and Chronicles Of Riddick to name but a few.
You do realize that isn't enough right? That is what everyone here is ignoring because most here are fans, which I get. But that doesn't change the numbers and what they represent. As the article said, it doesn't see how MGM doesn't lose here. Why do you think they mention this in the same article as point out those could end up being the numbers.Even your own article says it should cross 240-250 million mark. Do you want it to fail? Because as I understand it you haven't seen it yet and you haven't expressed an interest in doing so.
If I'm not mistaken, international sales can be iffy due to how the profits are being split can be a lot more convoluted than domestic BO. It's all about the domestic.
It is still common practice to sell certain territories rights. And we all know how ridiculous China is. Here Sony and MGM have split those numbers up already.If I'm not mistaken, international sales can be iffy due to how the profits are being split can be a lot more convoluted than domestic BO. It's all about the domestic.