Well I've said time and time again the ONLY robocop movie is RoboCop 1987. It began with that film and it ended. Much how people see terminator 1 and 2 being the only true terminator films.
Any other film, robo 2, 3, this, they aren't Officially Robocop. Sequels, reboots etc. so "this sure as hell wont be a robocop movie" doesn't really have any ground here. Of course it's not. It's Robocop, but not really if you get what I'm saying.
To me robocop is a one shot, it's meant to be the 1987 movie and that's the end of it. It can't possibly be better than the original, but it could be just as good in its own different ways.
I'm all for the reboot because I'm a huge fan of robocop. It will bring more attention to the name and it already has! I'm getting new toys and merchandise based on the 87 movie because of it! More people will watch the original that have dismissed it because of its horrible sequels and fan movies.
I understand there will never be anything like the 87 movie again, it's a product of its time and there's a REASON why we love it so much. There's reasons why there are sequels and reboots, but nothing will ever recapture what 87 did because thats what Robocop is. So anyone that's complaining its not a robocop movie, you need to look at it in a different perspective. Of course it's not going to be THE RoboCop. Because that is the 87 movie. THE definitive RoboCop. I can actually enjoy the reboot because of this. I'm not blinded by what robocop should be, because it began and ended with the 87 film. It's not 75+ years of artist interpretation, etc. like Batman, Superman and other comics. This character is based on one film and only one film.
So in other words, this IS a robocop movie, just not THE robocop. It's hard to explain, and hopefully someone else understands my ramblings lol. Easiest comparison I can think of is just the terminator films. It was meant to end at T2 and it officially does, no matter how many spin offs etc.