Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]404261[/split]
It is not about doing the same thing. It is about making a film that resembles Robocop.I like that they're doing something different with this. Why retread the original movie? We've already seen that one.
Trailer is badass.
Posted for new thread
[YT]x4ukwHdACDw[/YT]
That trailer gave me vibes of the Total Recall remake. It looks too damn polished and sterile.
It is not about doing the same thing. It is about making a film that resembles Robocop.
This looks like Rise of the Machines and Salvation compared to Terminator and Judgment Day. Devoid of what made the original film great, and made the film its own special piece of fiction.
I just watched Peyton Manning throw 7 TDs. It is great to be me.Sucks to be you, I think it looks awesome.
That trailer was not impressive. Looks too much like a generic, modern sci-fi action flick.
I just watched Peyton Manning throw 7 TDs. It is great to be me.
Again, you're not demonstrating any difference, certainly not one that is relevant to anything I'm talking about. Robocop was created by specific people, and then other people carried the franchise forward. Superman was created by specific people, and then other people carried the franchise forward. The situation is the same--the only difference is that in the case of Robocop, the other people did an inferior job of it.There's a huge difference between what makes a film and a comic book. The character of Robocop originated from a film written by neumeier and minor, directed by Paul Verhoeven, acted by Peter Weller. Those are the guys who brought robocop to life originally and who are robocop. If it does not involve them it isn't robocop either way. Comic books are often monthly/weekly episodes hand drawn and written by various different people through various different titles and have lasted much much longer than robocop.
That trailer was not impressive. Looks too much like a generic, modern sci-fi action flick.
That trailer was not impressive. Looks too much like a generic, modern sci-fi action flick.
This... is just a guy with a sweet robot body. A superhero movie. Safe. Easy. Nothing disturbing about it. Nobody is going to walk out offended. Some people might think that's a good thing. I think it means you're not taking any chances.
I'd say comparisons to the Total Recall remake along with Terminator Salvation are apt.
And this:
Don't understand the complaints at all. There's nothing about this that looks generic. Looks like they have successfully rebooted the beloved Robocop
To me he looks just like a guy in a suit (superhero costume). The original felt like a real machine with few human attributes whereas this, with the exposed hand and more of the face shown, doesn't share that. I do like the voice though.
I personally think that's still a possible scenario for the climax/final battle of the film.You guys are probably right, I just thought at some point they might unleash the old models on him.
Perfectly said.Me too, exploring the adjustment he has to make more acutely I think is a good idea.
I agree, to me the movie is still covering the essentials but I like the fact there is more of Murphy and how it's looking at the dangers of faceless weapons with no accountability being a way of dispersing justice in the future, not just in war but domestically.
Murphy getting burned via car bombing is lame. he should have been shot up to a bloody pulp like in the original
"Grasping at straws to find something not to like"?
God know that sounds nothing like the Hype.
I'd say comparisons to the Total Recall remake along with Terminator Salvation are apt.
And this: