DarthSkywalker
Your Most Aggro Pal (he/him)
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2004
- Messages
- 125,138
- Reaction score
- 65,709
- Points
- 203
That has nothing to do with anything.Which is dumb. Also, Iron Man 3 came out over 8 years ago. The movie doesn't hold up nearly as well for me as it did at the time. Views on movies can change and sour or even improve over time. Even Roger Ebert acknowledged later on that he thought the South Park movie was a good film which he trashed when he first saw it.
That's not who I'm referring to.
Who re you referring to?
You can't be this obtuse.Fast 9 - 59%
Fate of the Furious - 57%
Hobbs & Shaw - 67%
So if those movies get another 200 reviews, does it go up or down? Basically, you're only pointing out that a larger number of critics still far preferred Birds of Prey and Captain Marvel to these Fast movies.
Why do you think BOP, a movie that made 200m at the box office, ended up with Civil War and BvS level of reviews on RT. In comparison to one of the largest franchises there has ever been?
And if you answer is, "I don't know", maybe take a second to think about it. I mean after all you post on a superhero flick board.
I brought up 1984. That's nowhere nearly 80%. You brought up Captain Marvel, and just proved my point.I think deep down what you're upset about is that Birds of Prey and Captain Marvel are right on the edge of 80% and it doesn't look quite as nice.