DarthAlani
Civilian
- Joined
- May 8, 2007
- Messages
- 936
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
So because of that Iron Man will beat Thanos?
In the narrative sense, there was no other reason to have Hulk be TKO'd by a punch from Tony except to make Iron Man look good.
In the comics, after a Hulk rampage, he usually jumps away or turns back into Banner. His rampages are not typically ended by ONE character knocking him out by themselves. And if he is knocked out to stop his rampaging, it's usually a group of heroes that KO him, not just one punch from one hero.
Why the Hulk couldn't have just turned back into Banner after seeing the aftermath of their fight is beyond me. But I did enjoy the rest of the fight, so I shall attempt to curb my raging for now.
Hulkbuster doing it just leaves a sour taste in the mouth, especially for Hulk fans.
Or as you said, he could have just reverted back to Banner and let Stark take him in.
100% agree. Hulkbuster, at least as far as I can remember in comics, has always been used to CONTAIN the Hulk, not actually stop him, because he can't be stopped unless he "walks away" like Widow said.
I truly don't mean to be a stick in the mud.
It's just that my two favorite comic book heroes have always been the two Bruces, Bruce Wayne and Bruce Banner.
And while Bruce W. has had some killer moments in cinema thus far, my boy Bruce B. Has had a cinema record that is spotty at best.
And after seeing him kick ass in Avengers 1, I was disappointed they used him they way they did. He looked great, but the Hulkbuster thing, I mean reallly? One punch? Ok, I'm done.
The way the Hulk was taken out didn't bug me when watching but listening to the gripes here kinda makes me think it was a bit strange to just knock Hulk out like that. Shouldn't the fall/smash through the skyscraper have just made him more angry?
Also, didn't Joss say Hawkeye AND Hulk would have larger roles in this one? Certainly Hawkeye did but I can't see that applying to Hulk in this one. If anything, he was more prominent in the first one; especially since he arguably took out the villain himself.
Hulk had more screen time than in the first Avengers, but I don't think his role was expanded like we were promised.
On the plus side, he looked amazing. Even better than the first time around. ILM know their stuff. I can't wait for the day when inevitably he has an awesome voice and more of a speaking role in live action, sort of how he has been portrayed in the animated medium. It will happen one day! We'll just have to be patient and wait a bit longer.
I like how everyone says Iron Man is unstoppable, despite the fact that he was clearly getting his ass handed to him, and only won due to a sucker punch when Hulk was calmed down.
Now that I think about it, it is a little troubling that IM was able to beat Hulk on his own, even with the Hulkbuster armor. They should've made it so that Hulk comes back to his senses somehow. Honestly, I'm not exactly sure what Wanda did to him? Was she mind controlling him? Can she do that? It would have been nice to see what Wanda did to Hulk's mind that caused the rampage.
IM's unstoppable when he can keep replacing and upgrading his suit. Hulk gave him a real good fight, but IM won because Stark can out-technology anyone whenever needed. What exactly would it take for IM to lose a fight, anway?
I wish the Hulk spoke in the movie. I honestly have no idea whats next for the character.
I didn't like how they cut after the punch. Hulk seemed a little weakened after the fall but then he was getting angry again when he saw the cops.
Seems like they just conveniently glossed over how the Hulk was actually subdued.