and the film is still shootingFirst Class start their shoot in Sept 2010 for a June 2011 release while Snow White started in late July 2011 for a June 2012 release. So First Class's schedule was very extreme and lacked the polished it needed.
Here the CG looks damn polished which makes me think their pre-production was up to snuff.
Well...given that I was just voicing my personal opinion, I would say no, not reallyno, your statement is ridiculous, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that crazy improv music stuff...I actually prefer the Twlight woman's look to CT's, I appreciate CT's beauty, no doubt, but the only movie I ever really fancied her in was Aeon Flux, and i think that was because of the dyed black hair, don't ask me why, don't know, how can you explain these things, just gut reaction attraction of the tv crush kind.
Anyway, i feel a bit like Han solo in star wars when he is about to shoot that intercom...haha, i don't usually bother talking about crap like this on the net, everbody fancies who they fancy, and that is it! it is not science! we are not robots of the same design! did captain obvious really need to swoop in with this info?!
Well...given that I was just voicing my personal opinion, I would say no, not really![]()
What? Ummm no. I didn't say that at all. I think its going to be ridiculous if they hype her up as being the most beautiful woman in the film. Its a fact that Kirsten Stewart is not considered to be on the level of beauty they might try to portray her as. It was like in the Spider-man films when they'd mention how gorgeous Mary Jane was, when truthfully her comic counter part is but the actress playing would be considered somewhat average by most people. Thats when it will be ridiculous.Aye, a personal opinion that it was a ridulous notion that anyone could prefer the Twilight woman to CT. Which in turn is what I said was truly ridiculous.
Thor vs Twilight? no thanks
Sentinal X said:What? Ummm no. I didn't say that at all. I think its going to be ridiculous if they hype her up as being the most beautiful woman in the film. Its a fact that Kirsten Stewart is not considered to be on the level of beauty they might try to portray her as. It was like in the Spider-man films when they'd mention how gorgeous Mary Jane was, when truthfully her comic counter part is but the actress playing would be considered somewhat average by most people. Thats when it will be ridiculous.
As far as people thinking she is prettier than Charlize Theron well...good for them I really couldn't care less, my personal opinion is much different though
Really wouldn't work considering even the teaser reveals that there are points in the film where the Queen is rejuvenated and at her peak. It's a lot easier to age and ugg up an actress (which is also seen).What is ridiculous, is that the evil queen has been cast as an actress who is equally beautiful in her own way to SW, they should have gotten an actress who was at the stage where her prime was long past in the physical department. But, y'know, they want the nice faces on the posters to get the bums in seats.
Really wouldn't work considering even the teaser reveals that there are points in the film where the Queen is rejuvenated and at her peak. It's a lot easier to age and ugg up an actress (which is also seen).
As the classic tale goes, the Mirror had always told the Queen that she was the most fairest of all the land. It wasn't until Snow White reached adolescence (this changes based on the adaptation) that the Mirror had now considered Snow White to be the superior.oh right, ok, i don't see what Sentinal X is complaining about then, as there is a story conceit to explin why the queen is jealous of SW.
I have not seen any version of SW in many a year, so i forgot there was that aspect to the story.
She said she took a serial killer approach for the role.Okay... Charlize looks like a completely cold-blooded b*tch. Perfect.![]()
As the classic tale goes, the Mirror had always told the Queen that she was the most fairest of all the land. It wasn't until Snow White reached adolescence (this changes based on the adaptation) that the Mirror had now considered Snow White to be the superior.
I think some people are just rolling their eyes at the thought that Stewart approaches, much less beats, Theron's beauty.
thebumwhowalks said:I actually prefer the Twlight woman's look to CT's,
thebumwhowalks said:Aye, a personal opinion that it was a ridulous notion that anyone could prefer the Twilight woman to CT
thebumwhowalks said:This is partly why I feel the Twlight woman is more appealing to look at , she is not totally symmetrical, and has that goth-y type of look.
thebumwhowalks said:I always preffered the look of the twilight woman to CT
To add to that point, I think it would have been more fitting to switch the leads for both movies. If we were to judge solely on the premise of having a Snow White that looks more fairer than the Queen.
Yep. Looking at both the promo images for Snow White, Collins simply looks the part more. And because she looks so youthful (but undeniably beautiful), there's leeway there for her to grow into the prophecy of one-upping Theron.You mean have Stewart with Roberts and Collins with Theron?
You do know that Snow White didn't originate from the Disney movie?actually snow white was quite plain looking she was'nt some drop dead gorgeous princess was bland looking imo
but kristen fits the more moody and darker look SWATH has collins looks more disney princess like which tarseem's whole movie resemblesYep. Looking at both the promo images for Snow White, Collins simply looks the part more. And because she looks so youthful (but undeniably beautiful), there's leeway there for her to grow into the prophecy of one-upping Theron.
Didn't you just say beauty is in the eye of the beholder? The funny thing is I can understand if you think Kristen Stewart is more beautiful. That is your opinion and I respect that but you can't seem to get over mine....Secondly, I am hardly one to follow fashion magazine and tabloids. I do appreciate unconventional beauty but I wouldn't put Kristen Stewart into that category. She just looks average looking to me. She not ugly, not pretty...just an average looking galWho are you talking about? Style magazines? Fashion magazines?
Big deal. They are obviously going on about CT because her face is perfectly symmetrical, so there is a 'science of beauty' there that they can bang on about and no-one can say 'that's ridiculous', it's so their magazine can't be seen to be 'ridiculous' by anyone, a safe opinion to have.
It's just like a bunch of jocks in a locker room, who are all scared to say they fancy the goth girl who wears the crazy make-up, for fear of mockery, but will go on about the symmetrical blonde cheerleader, as there is a brainwashed consensus that is what true beauty is.
This is partly why I feel the Twlight woman is more appealing to look at , she is not totally symmetrical, and has that goth-y type of look. Her face is just as beautiful, but more intersting with it. Like, if they were paintings, they were both painted using the same materials, but one of them looks like a painting you haven't seen before, and one does. Because that type of popular painting is generally held up as the highest form of physical 'beauty'.
it is all bs.
What is ridiculous, is that the evil queen has been cast as an actress who is equally beautiful in her own way to SW, they should have gotten an actress who was at the stage where her prime was long past in the physical department. But, y'know, they want two equally beautiful faces on the posters to get the bums in seats.
oh right, ok, i don't see what Sentinal X is complaining about then, as there is a story conceit to explin why the queen is jealous of SW.
I have not seen any version of SW in many a year, so i forgot there was that aspect to the story.
but kristen fits the more moody and darker look SWATH has collins looks more disney princess like which tarseem's whole movie resembles
not saying kristen looks like a bad ass warrior in armor but looks more believable than collins ever would