Secret Fawful
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2007
- Messages
- 2,577
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
any thaughts on the possibility that bane could be ra's son? ....no ???

any thaughts on the possibility that bane could be ra's son? ....no ???
Maybe Talia will be re-written to be Ra's wife rather than daughter?
Apparently Bane and Talia are going to be lovers. Damien's dad is HIM!?
any thaughts on the possibility that bane could be ra's son? ....no ???
No, it's not the same at all. If Talia is included, it is simply adding details that were previously not covered. Probably because it was not relevant.
SM3 and Scream 3 took details from the first films and rewrote events which drastically altered history that was clearly laid out. There is nothing in Ra's one line that precludes the existence of an extended family. Not to the point that it comes off as a deus ex machina.
Hell no. Ra's Al Ghul has a paternal mentor relationship with Bruce because he has no biological son, so he trains Bruce with the intent of making him his successor.
That's your interpretation of that scene, not mine.
Or he wanted him to marry Talia and continue his bloodline. Like in the comics. Talia continues her father's plan. She seduces Bruce. Becomes pregnant and then disappears at the end only to drop the kid off with a good family at the end of the film. Bruce doesn't know the kid exists.
Let's stop tip-toeing around what people are actually thinking: Will he have the Ra'stache?
I know I sidelined my question by ending my post with a ben joke the first time I asked it, but I really am just wondering: How do people expect a flashback that takes place seemingly decades ago to possibly involved Ra's training Bane? This is a possibility I've seen some people discuss and it simply doesn't make sense to me. I mean how old is Bane? Isn't he just a few years younger than Bale?
Perhaps, assuming Neeson was lying about not returning, this dude just appears for a brief scene expressing interest in Bane when he's still a child growing up in jail. We then jump a few years into the future, with Neeson (or maybe someone else playing Ra's) actually training Bane when he's a young man. Or heck, maybe it will still be Josh Pence... after all something that bothered me in Begins was the fact that when Bruce was a kid, Mr. Earl, Alfred, Loeb and even Gordon were -all- played by the same actors, some of them without any attempt to make them look any younger, but that didn't seem to be an issue for Nolan then so I don't see why now. I'm willing to bet the flashbacks don't only go back 30 years ago, in any case, unless it has nothing to do with Bane in the first place which sadly is a possibility.I know I sidelined my question by ending my post with a ben joke the first time I asked it, but I really am just wondering: How do people expect a flashback that takes place seemingly decades ago to possibly involved Ra's training Bane? This is a possibility I've seen some people discuss and it simply doesn't make sense to me. I mean how old is Bane? Isn't he just a few years younger than Bale?
Let's stop tip-toeing around what people are actually thinking: Will he have the Ra'stache?
How integral were the plot points involving Uncle Ben and Billy to their first films? Now what significance does rewriting/adding onto that history later on, do to the perspective of the characters and events that were affected? It flips it entirely on its side, does it not?Yes, it is the exact same thing. Nothing in Spider-Man 1 and Scream refuted what was added to Spider-Man 3 and Scream 3. We never actually saw Uncle Ben get shot by the blond car jacker. Billy Loomis never stated how he found out his father was having an affair with Maureen Prescott.
I want to get a better handle of this. You would willingly accept Bruce has no family and is "alone", in spite of having a close and stable relation with Alfred? And when Rachel is still out and about, who is someone he clearly loves? Apparently it wasn't enough for him to stay in Gotham. He sought out meaning to his angst, because the people around him weren't capable of filling that void. It doesn't mean they don't exist and it doesn't mean their is no compassion both ways.So TDKR bringing in a daughter that Ra's never mentioned is exactly on the same lines as this. The only reason I'm not condemning it yet is because I don't know what Nolan is going to do with it yet.
But just looking at it from what was said in Begins, Ra's was comparing his loss with Bruce's, and how his anger nearly destroyed him when he lost his wife like Bruce's did when he lost his parents. But with Bruce he had no family left in the world. If Ra's has a daughter, then you would think she would have eased that anger because he still had someone to love and live for.
im very interested to know if the plot is linear or not this time round.nolan is not exactly a massive fun of linear story-telling (memento,BB,the prestige,inception all flick back and forth in time)
Did he train with Ra's for several years? I know he went missing for seven years traveling around the world to understand the criminal mind, but I don't think the training with Ra's took longer than a few months at most. Maybe I'm wrong, though.Well I never thought it made sense...
WHY THE HELL WOULD RA'S POSE FOR SEVERAL YEARS AS HENRI DUCARD IN FRONT OF BRUCE?
Well I never thought it made sense...
WHY THE HELL WOULD RA'S POSE FOR SEVERAL YEARS AS HENRI DUCARD IN FRONT OF BRUCE?
WHY WOULD THERE BE SO MUCH SECRECY AND IMPORTANCE FOR JUST THE ONE PERSON?
So Im willing to believe in the sense that he has a daughter and doesnt give a rats ass about her,and prefers obsessively training strangers and being secretive about his identity.
Maybe Bane has always been with Talia as her bodyguard,I dont know.