The Amazing Spider-Man Spider-Man Reboot Costume Part 4 - "What's that in his eye??" - Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
evry1 noes dat d new suit has those round things right? i wonder if he got dirt in there how troublesome it would b 2 get it out!
What round things? The material on his finger tips? I don't know what you're on about.:hehe:
 
I really like the suit, I don't 'love' the suit but I do like it. I certain like it better than both nolan bat suits and the superman returns suit.

in a ideal would they would have taken the exact spidey suit from the comics and given it the texture of the new suit, but ho hum.
 
What do you guys think of the change in the back spider from the round one of the comics in both the Acheson and Barrett suits? Should it be used on film?
Spider-Man_back.ashx

Do you think that not using this symbol was a needless alteration, or do you think the more detailed back spiders from the movies were better and/or better suited for live-action?
I personally fall into the second camp. I prefer the back spider from the movies to the one in the comics. It looks more like a spider, not a tick.
 
As I said before, I love the comci book version and the Acheson verison, but I'm not sure if the comic book version would work. I feel Acheson perfected it the way he translated it oto the big screen.
 
As I said before, I love the comci book version and the Acheson verison, but I'm not sure if the comic book version would work. I feel Acheson perfected it the way he translated it oto the big screen.

I think it could work in live-action in a less detailed, more simplistic design, but the movie costumes so far I think are too detailed for it to work. It would stick out like a sore thumb.
 
Raimi's Spider-Man = A close version to the comics

Webb's Spider-Man = A "new-age" take on the suit, but still keeping with the known look albeit changes

I'll still say it, there's nothing wrong with Webb's suit. It fits with the lean and acrobat look as well as the science look since we're not dealing with organic webbing and since I always had a problem with the webbing going through the suit(no flaming, that's just me ).
 
Based on The Dark Knight's which isn't even remotely close to the original version of Batman's suit, it just doesn't matter to the masses. And like The Dark Knight their focus better be on making a great film, it'll pay off in the long run, especially for the sequel.
 
©KAW;22051475 said:
Based on The Dark Knight's which isn't even remotely close to the original version of Batman's suit, it just doesn't matter to the masses. And like The Dark Knight their focus better be on making a great film, it'll pay off in the long run, especially for the sequel.

With The Dark Knight, the suit makes sense for the film itself, which leads me to believe the Spidey design will make sense for the film. Will people still hate it? Yah, but people still hate TDK's design.
 
With The Dark Knight, the suit makes sense for the film itself, which leads me to believe the Spidey design will make sense for the film. Will people still hate it? Yah, but people still hate TDK's design.
Doesn't matter, fact remains, it's not anything like the original costume and no one cared (not even a little bit) when it came to going to see the film in theaters.
 
©KAW;22051567 said:
Doesn't matter, fact remains, it's not anything like the original costume and no one cared (not even a little bit) when it came to going to see the film in theaters.

Some people cared.

I cared, because I am one to actually want a suit, for any hero, to make sense within the film's structure itself. The "changing of the guard" from the BB suit to the TDK suit made sense. As well as Captain America's suit in The First Avenger.
 
With The Dark Knight, the suit makes sense for the film itself

This arguement is not directly to you, but I just wanted to throw my opinion on this matter.

People always use this excuse to defend the Nolan Batman costume.

And I completely disagree. Don't take this to mean that I hate the costume or anything, btw. I find it perfectly fine.

BUT, if they really wanted to stick to the comic costume, they could just as easily have. Look at how Batman: Arkham Asylum and Batman: Arkham City did the costume. The costume from those games would have worked just as perfectly in Nolan-verse. Both those universes are tonally very similar too, and so the costume would work.
 
Some people cared.

I cared, because I am one to actually want a suit, for any hero, to make sense within the film's structure itself. The "changing of the guard" from the BB suit to the TDK suit made sense. As well as Captain America's suit in The First Avenger.
I see where you going, but most people just want the classic suit, they don't care about what makes sense within the structure of the film. My point is with the classic suit or without it, the general audience won't care if they enjoy the film as a whole.
 
The games are tonally similar, yes.

But you won't see the Lazarus Pit in a Nolan Batman movie anytime soon...
 
The Lazarus Pit has nothing to do with the tone. Or the costume.

So I don't see your point...
 
Exactly. I love it when they make excuses for Nolan changing the Batman suit completely, but go apesh-- when a few things on Spider-Man's suit is changed.
 
Last edited:
The Lazarus Pit has nothing to do with the tone. Or the costume.

So I don't see your point...

The Lazarus Pit can bring the dead back to life.

To name a few things the Arkham games feature, the Lazarus Pit and a ****ing zombie. (Solomon Grundy)

In case it's still not clear to you, my point is that those things are way outside of the realm of realism that Nolan has created for his Batman universe. Which is why you won't be seeing them or anything even remotely close to the Arkham costume/a somewhat comic accurate costume in Nolan's Batman.
 
Last edited:
This arguement is not directly to you, but I just wanted to throw my opinion on this matter.

People always use this excuse to defend the Nolan Batman costume.

And I completely disagree. Don't take this to mean that I hate the costume or anything, btw. I find it perfectly fine.

BUT, if they really wanted to stick to the comic costume, they could just as easily have. Look at how Batman: Arkham Asylum and Batman: Arkham City did the costume. The costume from those games would have worked just as perfectly in Nolan-verse. Both those universes are tonally very similar too, and so the costume would work.

Arkham's suit still has the black underwear, which I doubt will be used in any movie. Batman Begins was pretty dang near perfect, imo, but what I am referring to is the 'knight' look with the armor in which Christopher Nolan had wanted even with Batman Begins and he finally devised a plan to use such a form of the comics suit than to transfer to his design, which was a good idea since it fits into the film series.

©KAW;22052073 said:
I see where you going, but most people just want the classic suit, they don't care about what makes sense within the structure of the film. My point is with the classic suit or without it, the general audience won't care if they enjoy the film as a whole.

This is true. I just care because I like to think on what's going on and what is the purpose of everything instead of just watching something with an empty mind, but yes...a lot of people just brush it off and don't care as long as it's something worthwhile on film to watch.
 
3 new banners, courtesy of Real Iron Man (posted over at CBR)

86247402.png


66703982.png


64803489.png


Costume looks...AMAZING :awesome: :oldrazz:

PS sorry if these images have already been posted
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,357
Messages
22,090,873
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"