a)I havent claimed you said anything,so I didnt twist any of your words.While you did because I said "it played a part" while you were arguing "whether it played a big part".And you again say "You assumed no one will elaborate "..when have I stopped anyone from elaborating or discussing this said topic?I merely stated my reading of the situation.You are free to disagree with it.But okay,lets put this down to miscommunication,and I will believe your intentions were not bad.
b) First,I claimed SS's marketing played a part in the frontloading.You seem to agree with my on this.That was the only thing I claimed and we agree on that I think.Moving on to your question about comparing it to other movies.
c)I dont think comparing it to TDKR is a good comparison despite the similarities.Why?And these are just my opinions here.I thought the TDKR is a great movie.I was not surprised by its great BO run.SS is not a "great" movie imo.Its a decent fun flick.TDKR was made by Nolan,thats a big thing and shouldnt be compared to SS which is meant to be a much smaller movie so I am not surprised by its lesser BO performance.And regarding the drop,I dont think TDKR(a Batman movie made by Nolan after the TDK) making $160mil OW is overachieving.However a Suicide Squad movie making $133mil OW is certainly over achieving in my book,which imo was partly down to the absolutely brilliant marketing and the fanboy effect. Had it completely derailed after OW like other movies we know,then I would have agreed with you.However its more like the Twilight saga or HP sequels where it has a decent run after the over-achieving OW.Thats my opinion,and my reading of the situation.