Tra-El
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
- Messages
- 11,315
- Reaction score
- 4,243
- Points
- 103
Ooh I hadn’t thought of that; good call.
That's freaking brilliant. Give me an Escape From Bizarro World NOW.
Ooh I hadn’t thought of that; good call.
I really doubt there will be that nuance in the future.
This movie clearly shows Jor-El and Lara with an evil and selfish attitude. If you are interpreting differently, it's likely only because you don't like the Kryptonian side being portrayed in such a negative light.
If future movies want to show Jor-El and Lara in a better light, they would need to retcon this in some way.
I really doubt there will be that nuance in the future.
This movie clearly shows Jor-El and Lara with an evil and selfish attitude. If you are interpreting differently, it's likely only because you don't like the Kryptonian side being portrayed in such a negative light.
If future movies want to show Jor-El and Lara in a better light, they would need to retcon this in some way.
Here's crossing our fingers that Gunn will finally bring Brainiac to the screen for the film's sequel.
The Jor-EL and Lara angle/twist was a surprising one. Ballsy even. It's a thread I didn't expect Gunn to entertain. For that reason, it brings an entirely new definition and depth to Kryptonian culture and mythology.
Deep down, I think James really wanted to nail his Superman down to being more Earthly, a good man of this world, and one who loves to love. This also tied into the structure and theme of David's moment as Superman in the end where being human is his greatest strength. Gunn drew a line there, which could play thick within' Kryptonian acknowledgment, especially if we can finally get to a green creature from Colu in this lifetime (along with the release of Supergirl next summer).
The Jor-EL and Lara angle/twist was a surprising one. Ballsy even. It's a thread I didn't expect Gunn to entertain. For that reason, it brings an entirely new definition and depth to Kryptonian culture and mythology.
Deep down, I think James really wanted to nail his Superman down to being more Earthly, a good man of this world, and one who loves to love. This also tied into the structure and theme of David's moment as Superman in the end where being human is his greatest strength. Gunn drew a line there, which could play thick within' Kryptonian acknowledgment, especially if we can finally get to a green creature from Colu in this lifetime (along with the release of Supergirl next summer).
I can already tell we are going to get a supergirl and lobo trying to out drink each other scene.Kara may know about Krypton ideology (although that depends on her age when she arrived to Earth), but Kara doesn't have to know Jor-El or Kara's plan of Kal-El conquering Earth. It's possible Kara believed the same as Clark due to the damaged message.
In Kara's regular origin, Zor-El (Kara's father) send her to Earth without Jor-El being involved at all (at most, Zor-El was inspired by his brother idea). Considering Jor-El and Lara don't mention Kara at all, it's pretty likely they mantain this aspect.
I liked the twist .
Smallville and My Adventures With Superman, also played with the idea of Jor El being a less than benevolent figure , and whether or not he wanted Clark to rule Earth , but ultimately, those adaptations wouldn't go there, the way Gunn did .
By the same token, I liked that The Batman Showed a much darker and more complex side to Thomas and Martha, as opposed to being paragons of virtue .
I can already tell we are going to get a supergirl and lobo trying to out drink each other scene.
Agreed! When Pa turns to Lois and asks if his boy is going to be ok...I dont have kids but I teared up.I gotta say I really, really liked this version of the Kents. I liked how they weren't moral paragons constantly espousing folksy wisdom. Rather, they are just simple, decent people and loving parents. As someone who only has one miracle child after a long battle with infertility, I identified a ton with Pa and his "Mush" persona.
I think in modern adaptations, that is what should define why the Kents are such great parents, not any sort of Midwestern salt of the era trope (which is sadly increasingly inaccurate). There was this energy with this version of the Kents, especially after Clark was injured and in the flashback recordings, that really spoke to a couple who really wanted to be parents but were denied that opportunity and their desire to make the most of that when they got the surprise miracle of Clark.
You could feel it in the preciousness with which they treated him. I could really see that preciousness informing how Clark sees and treats other people and why he treats life generally as so valuable and precious.
My friend...the second viewing is better! I'm so happy we finally have a Superman film to celebrate!Saw Superman last night! I'm getting better at letting things settle, sink in and not have a tender knee jerk reaction because in all honesty, the first viewing, for me, is just absorbing as much as the material and experience as possible (knowing I'll be missing some things in between).
That said, my jaw hurts from grinning and smiling pretty much the entire film. I have this warm sensation to see Superman again to hone in and slow things down because Gunn really goes for it as a whole. From the fast pace, to the extremely long dialogue, to the ambitious camera angles and creative choices throughout, this thing plays out like a pure romp of Superman goodness.
I will post more after my second and third viewings, only to make sure my thoughts are lining up with my own before committing to full blown conversations.
But since it is a Superman film, I will say this about the leading man now: I was sold within the very first few minutes and latched on to David's performance as Superman almost immediately. His delivery and ability to take what he is given with a STRONG co-lead in Rachel was incredibly satisfying and he looked absolutely quintessential in many shots from this colorful and witty take. Overall, my crew loved it (there are a good handful of negatives, but negatives that don't negate the viewing pleasure) but I will respond as we go judging from multiple viewings! I am already eager to get back to the theater. Hope you all enjoyed!
Look up
![]()
Not that you asked me but...Who in the cast stood out to you?
Totally agree with your first point though. I really liked this all-in-all but I think there’s improvements Gunn can make in a sequel that would really knock it out of the park.
I'm sorry but that just isn't true. Lex set up a plan where Superman couldn't do both so Superman trusted other metas to stop the war (the lesser problem) while he literally saved The Earth. (The true problem) Mr. Terrific even puts it that way when he calls Clark as Clark is ready to head to Boravia. Mr. Terrific couldnt stop the rift unless they got to Lex and only Superman could do that. Trusting others to have your back while you go save billions is 100% what Superman would do. Its often the very nature of his relationship with the Justice League.I thought it was funny that Superman outsourced being a hero in that madeup country. Superman never even shows up, in his own movie he leaves the people calling out for him to someone else. I just don't think Gunn gets it. Superman stops the mega threat, but he also saves the cat in tree. But don't forget Gunn actually did do that earlier in the movie. Superman saves a dog while stopping a giant reptile. But as far as people go, Gunn's Superman has priorities and doesn't do the thing Superman does. Which is get there in the nick of time. That is the trope that Superman embodies. He always shows up right when you need him most. But not Gunn's Superman.
The movie has PLENTY of flaws, but this is not one of them AT ALL. Superman cannot be everywhere at once. The movie clearly established that the rift is a threat to the entirety of existence so of course he goes there. And no, sending the Justice Gang is not even remotely "outsourcing". It is being Superman, being a leader and inspiring others to join in and do what is right.I thought it was funny that Superman outsourced being a hero in that madeup country. Superman never even shows up, in his own movie he leaves the people calling out for him to someone else. I just don't think Gunn gets it. Superman stops the mega threat, but he also saves the cat in tree. But don't forget Gunn actually did do that earlier in the movie. Superman saves a dog while stopping a giant reptile. But as far as people go, Gunn's Superman has priorities and doesn't do the thing Superman does. Which is get there in the nick of time. That is the trope that Superman embodies. He always shows up right when you need him most. But not Gunn's Superman.
Can't wait man! Been thinking about this one since I left the theater. Just the matter of picking the best times with the busy schedule!My friend...the second viewing is better! I'm so happy we finally have a Superman film to celebrate!
It has been in my head for 3 days straight now.Anyone else just been thinking "Well I'm a punkrocker, yes I am..." since watching the movie... or just me? LOL!