gugumugats
SKIDOOOOOSH!!
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2011
- Messages
- 1,368
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 58
The re-play value of AC is amazing. I've played story mode 3x now and usually do some of the challenges everyday ....
Agreed. The Arkham stories haven't been bad, just not up to Dini's standards. However, the dialogue and characterization is always perfect (well, besides Bane). I loved how Batman was such a jerk in AC.
I will be in utter shock if there is a TDKR video game.. Shocked.
Dini has done a much better job in writing Batman over the years. AA/AC's stories were mediocre to bad.
I, for one, liked the Mass Effect 3 ending a lot. I was deeply moved by it and I kinda never really bought into the whole, "all your decisions will matter in the end"-thingy, even if it would've been awesome.
The only real problem for me was that you don't get to see what happens with all the aliens on earth, and your friends and the lifes you affected. I would've loved to see what happens to Garrus and Wrex and Grunt and so on. But apart from that, the whole thing that happened to Shepard was great in my eyes. Very moving.
Yeah, you are right, stories in games are different than in comics, but, compared to the story of, say heavy rain, or Mass effect for that matter, the Arkham stories weren't that good. They weren't bad or anything, but they didn't deserved all that praise they got.
For me the real winner with the Arkham games was the gameplay, which made you feel like the Dark Knight. Easily the best part of the games. The story was good, but not great. I also had a few little problems with characterization in a few little instances, just like Leo Ho Tep pointed out before me.
All that aside, however, I loved those games! Best Batman games we got, till now. I just don't get all the people who say stuff like "They should adapt the games for the next movies". For a game series it was great, but the story singled out? Only alright.
As for mass 3, im a huge fan of heinlein, scott card, asimov and tons of other sci fi novels, Heck im a huge neon genesis fan. So i expect sci fi to usually have fatalistic endings, so i get where bioware came from and while i don't fully support, i understand and i approve. I get where the hate comes from, usually by people who aren't familiar with the concepts i just mentioned, and from the more visceral disappointment of not having anything you do mean much/everything being down to one singular desicion. Storywise its more than fine, it's classic sci fi, it's just bad game mechanics. I always say if mass 3 was a film, then that ending would have still been divisive...but there wouldn't be legions of ignorant fans petitioning to change the ending.
Heavy rain is different, that was pretty much an interactive movie you can't compare it to an action adventure SANDBOX game like arkham city. Sandbox games on their own are hard enough to write a coherant narrative for, I just choose to go with the flow and not bring the entirety of my batman fandom into the game (if i do i'll get disappointed in every game or film batman related)
Léo Ho Tep;22717243 said:I don't think being a sandbox game had anything to do with the bad story in Arkham City. It's not the flow of the story that bothers me, but rather the very bad characterization. And I don't care for twists at every turn just for shock value.
Expect the unexpected with the joker...
Game Tie-Ins suck. Have the developers work for two years on a game that spans the trilogy's storyline along with some extra padding of some storylines/villains within the various time gaps and you've got yourself a game that isn't complete trash whilst still allowing us to experience the highlights of the Nolanverse.